Montana GOP Rewriting Election Law for 1 Race Only

[Rebound]

Hey, conservatives, what do you think about this? What do you think about “crooked election laws” this time?

The GOP legislature in Montana is seeking to change election law… but only for one single election, the 2024 Senate campaign. In an effort to oust Democrat Jon Tester, they are pushing legislation which would allow only two candidates on the General Election ballot, preventing Libertarian and Independent candidates from being listed on the ballot — where they could potentially siphon votes from the Republican candidate.   And this would apply ONLY to the 2024 Senate race and no other race.  
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/14/us/politics/montana-election-bill-senate-tester.html

[Aristides]

The writing is on the wall, soon this is the only way the GOP will be able to win elections.

They would eliminate Democrats too if they could get away with it. Shades of Communism. You can vote for any candidate you want as long as they are from the the Communist party. 

Edited April 14, 2023 by Aristides

[reason10]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Hey, conservatives, what do you think about this? What do you think about “crooked election laws” this time?

The GOP legislature in Montana is seeking to change election law… but only for one single election, the 2024 Senate campaign. In an effort to oust Democrat Jon Tester, they are pushing legislation which would allow only two candidates on the General Election ballot, preventing Libertarian and Independent candidates from being listed on the ballot — where they could potentially siphon votes from the Republican candidate.   And this would apply ONLY to the 2024 Senate race and no other race.  
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/14/us/politics/montana-election-bill-senate-tester.html

Once again you show the total INFERIORITY of blue state public schools, first by citing an unreliable FAKE NEWS OPINION RAG (one that will not open for most of us unless we buy a subscription to its lies) then by not bothering to offer any real DETAILS of this bill. (Then again, you Woke Nazis are too stupid to even be able to SPELL "details."

Here's the bill:

https://leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/billhtml/SB0566.htm

Drive to the nearest red state and find someone with enough education to read that bill, simplify it and explain it to your third grade dropout mind.

Oh, by the way. YOU GOOSE STEPPERS HAVE NO FCKING RIGHT TO BITTTTTCH ABOUT CHANGES IN ELECTION LAWS FOR A PARTICULAR ELECTION SINCE THE MAJOR CHANGES IN MAIL IN VOTING ALLOWED THE FRAUD WHICH ILLEGALLY ELECTED BIDEN. SEVERAL STATES ACTUALLY VIOLATED THEIR OWN CONSTITUTIONS BY CHANGING THOSE RULES.

[Rebound]

25 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Once again you show the total INFERIORITY of blue state public schools, first by citing an unreliable FAKE NEWS OPINION RAG (one that will not open for most of us unless we buy a subscription to its lies) then by not bothering to offer any real DETAILS of this bill. (Then again, you Woke Nazis are too stupid to even be able to SPELL "details."

Here's the bill:

https://leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/billhtml/SB0566.htm

Drive to the nearest red state and find someone with enough education to read that bill, simplify it and explain it to your third grade dropout mind.

Oh, by the way. YOU GOOSE STEPPERS HAVE NO FCKING RIGHT TO BITTTTTCH ABOUT CHANGES IN ELECTION LAWS FOR A PARTICULAR ELECTION SINCE THE MAJOR CHANGES IN MAIL IN VOTING ALLOWED THE FRAUD WHICH ILLEGALLY ELECTED BIDEN. SEVERAL STATES ACTUALLY VIOLATED THEIR OWN CONSTITUTIONS BY CHANGING THOSE RULES.

Those states did not violate their constitutions as the supreme courts of the respective states upheld the election law changes which allowed people to vote during a pandemic. 
 

Maybe if Trump managed the pandemic those changes wouldn’t have been necessary and he surely would have been re-elected except for his massive mismanagement of the crisis. 

[reason10]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Those states did not violate their constitutions as the supreme courts of the respective states upheld the election law changes which allowed people to vote during a pandemic. 
 

Maybe if Trump managed the pandemic those changes wouldn’t have been necessary and he surely would have been re-elected except for his massive mismanagement of the crisis. 

The states that committed voter fraud DAMNED SURE VIOLATED THEIR CONSTITUTIONs, because the mail vote items bypassed the legislatures.

Trump managed the OBAMA VIRUS better than any DemoNazi could have, and the economy was expanding in his last six months in office. After people started realizing that the word "pandemic" was a LIE, their behavior shifted and the economy healed.

Trump was REELECTED in a landslide ON ELECTION NIGHT. And it took voter fraud to overturn that reelection.
 

I'm also assuming you haven't looked at the law I cited to prove the LIE that the Treason Times slimed all over the place.

We're waiting.

[impartialobserver]

Back to the topic, 

Not sure why Montana would do this. While a very Conservative state, it is also one where third parties do relatively well. 

[reason10]

29 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Back to the topic, 

Not sure why Montana would do this. While a very Conservative state, it is also one where third parties do relatively well. 

Until the left wingers who vomited this thread come up with reliable sources, (or just plain READ THE FCKING LAW I provided) none of this will make any sense at all.

[CrakHoBarbie]

3 hours ago, reason10 said:

 

 THE MAJOR CHANGES IN MAIL IN VOTING ALLOWED THE FRAUD WHICH ILLEGALLY ELECTED BIDEN. 

Where did you ever get the moronic notion that repeating a lie over and over would magically make the lie true?

But I'm a generous person. Please explain the process by which mail in ballots lost the election for your demigod.

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Back to the topic, 

Not sure why Montana would do this. While a very Conservative state, it is also one where third parties do relatively well. 

That’s why they are doing it.

[Hodad]

Once again, the GOP is making David Frum into a bona fide futurist.

"If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy," -- David Frum

[Rebound]

3 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Back to the topic, 

Not sure why Montana would do this. While a very Conservative state, it is also one where third parties do relatively well. 

Exactly.  They don’t want a Libertarian candidate to siphon votes from a Republican candidate. 

[reason10]

18 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Where did you ever get the moronic notion that repeating a lie over and over would magically make the lie true?

But I'm a generous person. Please explain the process by which mail in ballots lost the election for your demigod.

I'm still waiting for ONE of you Nazis to actually READ the fcking bill. I provided it. So far, all you cretins have done is change the subject.

Crawl back under your rock, troll.

[reason10]

16 hours ago, Rebound said:

Exactly.  They don’t want a Libertarian candidate to siphon votes from a Republican candidate. 

So far, you haven't provided ANY proof that Montana has done such a thing. I offered you the proof in the form of the ACTUAL FCKING BILL THE STATE PASSED. Are you just too STUPID to read it?