Jewish Center Bomb Threat Suspect Is Arrested in Israel

[taxme]

1 hour ago, Rue said:

I have never stated there's been no discrimination in Canada or anywhere else in the world. Hernanday infers such things . He does not appear to be able to deal with more than two polarized opposite values at any given time when communicating. Even then he gets confused at what he states is in conflict.

I enjoy Jew threads. I get to giggle along with Taxme about how the Tm Horton;s Roll Up The Rim Contest is only for gentiles.

 

It is? I was not aware of this contest was only for gentiles?  Giggle-giggle. 

[H10]

On 3/31/2017 at 2:17 PM, Rue said:

Its not difficult for me or anyone to go on the internet and realize that the Jews are Khazars myth is just that and has been repeated by individuals such as yourself who have an anti-Semitic agenda on web sites to attack Jews as not being a distinct people.

Its not difficult at all to deal with people with such agendas.

Its also not difficult to point out the very scientist Hernanday quoted to suggest Jews are a race the way he uses the term is false, but that this scientist has shown that Jews do have a distinctive gene and other genetic links that can be traced to their origins in the Middle East and he did so precisely to prove the Jews are Kahzars allegation is a myth-a lie.

You can go and provide me or anyone with all the sites you want that deny Jews are Jews, claim there was no holocaust, etc., lol it snot difficult tp repudiate them. Its been done on this board over and over. Its not that hard.

Now let's recap. Jews have along with Palestinians a common genetic link that shows there are Jews, Muslims and Christians in religion, who can be t raced back to people of the Middle East in the area today called Israel, Jordan, the West Bank and Southern Lebanon and Syria.

These shared genetic characteristics explain a pattern of diseases such as Tay-Sachs a blood disease. We know for example people Hernanday calls Africans and many call blacks have common genetic traits such as a propensity for diabetes, hypertension and sickle cell anemia. We know for example in Scandinavia, with pale, blue eyed girls, there appears to be a higher rate of a certain kind of juvenile arthritis.

These genetic similarities help us identify and understand certain patterns of diseases. They suggest certain genes carry inheritable medical conditions. It doesn't make people members of the so called "negroid", "Caucasian" or "oriental" or "mongol" races.

Those terms which people use today to describe, blacks, people of China-Japan-Korea, of who Hernanday calls "white) are subjective. They are subjective constructs use to define people by skin pigment tone, hair texture and nose shape. They mean nothing. In science such traits are secondary. You can have a so called white person and coal black person with more in common genetically than two coal black men or two white men. Its got nothing to do with such characteristics.

In fact white people who are not what Hernanday calls African or some would call black can have sickle cell anemia or other diseases because of their genetic traits picke dup from African ancestry. Their skin colour is not what causes them to have such illnesses, their genetic profile does.

When a scientist talks of genetic profiles to classify people as fitting in a genetic category of same genetic characteristics, they might call that race, but certainly not in the context Hernanday uses it or Nazis used it or anti semites like you use it.

Englightened people have moved on from defining people by the structure of their nose or skin colour although I appreciate with you the need to perpetuate a Jewish-Arab conflict and a need to deny Jewish people exist as part of your agenda to suggest they have no right to be in the Middle East. You have made that clear in many prior hateful responses.

The fact is Hernanday's comments were ridiculous. Palestinians and Jews are not a different race. They are the same people. At least those with the same genetic links. There are Palestinians who are not descended from Palistinians at all-they could be Turks, Mongols, Greeks,etc.  Next, no Jew as Hernanday stated and this is why he can not produce one, no Jew whether a Zionist or non Zionist calls ourselves a race. The Nazis did. Anti-semites did, certainly not us. We have and have always called ourselves a collective identity. Our identity consists of many components including religion, culture, ethnicity, language, genetic links, nationality, shared sense of political oppression, art, literature. In fact people today who call themselves Arabs use the same kind of collective identity. True Arabs if they exist would probably only exist now with the Beduins who would MIGHT be descended from them. The fact though is the term Arab changed from referringt o the eoples of the Arabian peninsula who were the ancestors of Jews, Christians and then Muslims to a political national identity reinvented by Gamel Nasser and absolutely no different than how Jews reinvented the term Jew NOT just to mean following the Jewish religion but many other things.

Nowhere in the Old Testament (Torah), Talmud or Kabalah or any Rabbinical commentaries do any Jewish scholars let alone we ordinary people, refer to Jews as a race. It would be absurd to. As I have stated over and over, and is common sense, there are using Hernanday's terminology, African Jews. They can be coal black and look like stereotype racist blacks bigots think of, to the Felashies who most of you would  all Ethiopian looking because that is where they are from. There are Tsfardic-Mitzrahi Jews or Arab Jews who speak Arabic as their first language (the majority of Israelis) and have the same physical characteristics of any Muslim or Christian Arab-they are mixed-they could go from coal black traditional "negroid" to pale white "Caucasian" and everything in between. They could be no different in physical characteristic than Indians in India, where they live in Mumbai. They could be Chinese, i.e., what Hernanday would call yellow people with narrow eyes.

To call us a race is absurd. We are like Arabs completely mixed. People like Hernanday define the world in skin colours. Only enlightened blacks like enlightened whites do not. We know better. Just because one is black does not mean Hernanday can lump them all into one category called African. What nonsense. There are Africans that come from Indian, Chinese, Jewish, Arab ancestry or are white.Even if we said BLACK, the variation in black in Africa ranges from purple skin tone to extreme pale white or yellow with every eye shape, hair texture, nose shape.

Hernanday chooses to see black and white the way white neo Nazis do. Its that simple. He defines people by secondary physical characteristics. amaicans, Haitiens, people from Grenada, Cuba, Barbados, St. Lucia, Martiniques, certainly can trace themselves back to African slaves it doesn't make them African and give him the right to lump them in this one narrow rigid definition.I have been at the schools when an angry Jamaican parent says stop calling me African fool, I am Jamaican by culture not African and I am a Canadian not an African. Hernanday is part of a world that wants what he thinks is best only for him and plays a victim card. Israel did not create its country based on running from racism and calling Jews victims, it comes from standing up in the face of a holocaust and countries refusing to take Jews back and taking an existential stand and say, no we will not remain victims and stateless. Zionism was an act of political sufferage. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with redefining Jews as a persecuted nationality that said NEVER AGAIN. Jews created Israel no different than the former slaves did in Haiti.

Now there are blacks, Jews, Christians, Muslims who want to segregate into private religious schools. Its their right in a democracy to do that and this is why they do it in Canada and Israel but not in Muslim Sharia law nations because Sharia law nations demand all non Muslims be segregated into their own schools-there's no concept of public schooling where all peoples are welcome. In Canada's public Catholic school board they can NOT turn away non Catholics. A private Catholic school could.

What Hernanday did is to equate school issues with political sufferage and nationhood and define them as the same. They are not. The issue is, in Canada all peoples have the same rights now. To suggest as Hernanday does that they are being exterminated so need a school was gibberish. If it fact they were being exterminated and created their own black Canadian nation based on saying no to extermination, it might have an anology at that level with what Israel did. Let me know when Hernanday urges a separate black nation in Canada. Can't wait. I can only imagine where he will set it up and what title he gives himself.The fact is blacks are not being exterminated based on any state policy although I am sure in Hernanday's mind, when a young black man is murdered by a police officer Trudeau ordered it as part of state policy. Multi-culturalism flourishes in Canada to the point its probably gone too far and undermines an ability to create a common Canadian unity by focusing too much on what we WERE and not enough on what we ARE. I stated and I still argue segregation based on skin culture is racist. I state it again, how can anyone of any common sense and intelligence expect others to be tolerant of them when they pull out of the same environment and refuse to be part of it? That just creates barriers. Temporary learning aids or special classes to keep kids with high drop out rates in school or to help them learn is one thing-removing them completely and permanently is another. Its a complex subject. I personally believe mainstreaming certain kids with special disabilities is unfair to them, their parents, the school system and sets up unrealistic accommodation expectations. That does not mean I am pro segregation. I am not making a general rule. I get why for example we take kids in wheelchairs and put them in mainstream schools. That's real society. So is working with kids of all kinds of physical disability but if it impairs them to the extent that they can't learn its unfair to force them into an environment that expects them to.

Its complex. I am not here to say certain gay children who were being beaten up or ridiculed did not do better when placed in the gay public school. It seems to have helped aboriginal children as well. However such programs were not meant to be misappropriated by bigots to argue racial segregation.

Next, I will say it again-it is absurd that Muslims now are demanding they be given prayer rooms in public schools, segregated washrooms so they can wash 5 times a day as part of their prayers, pray 5 times a day, etc. No. No Muslim, no Jew, no Christian, no Wiccan, no Bahaii, no one should expect a public school to do such things during public school hours. If you can't do your prayers before you go to school or after you leave school then too bad, if you are that unwilling to assimilate in the public system pay to go to a private school. Do not demand the public schools begin to incorporate specific religions desires  because then every damn child and his parent's of every damn religion, culture, perceived race, perceived ethnicity, sexual desire, will want accommodation. We are a nation too full of self indulgent spoiled children and parents who think democracy is unlimited and must accommodate what ever anyone demands. No. It does not. It's not how democracy works. Democracy is not a system where minorities get to rule and bully others and turn the system of tolerance into one of intolerance where people play the minority card to compete with one another for who gets more special treatment.

Look at where we are headed. There was this idiot who called herself a black woman for years and headed a black rights organization. She was outed as a white woman although she lied and told everyone she was black African. Now two years after her being exposed as a fraud she writes a book calling herself transracial and stating ever since she was a young girl she felt she was black and drew herself in pictures as black and so should be called black since she feels black. How far we going to go indulging people?

The topic went of tangent because that is what it was supposed to trigger-anti Jew comments and it did. There's only one story regarding this thread-thperson whoc alled in the death threats is either a terrorist idiot, or a mentally ill individual. Whether his Jewish religion inspired him to do this does not appear to be the case

 

Hernanday provide the words from me where I said there was no discrimination against Jews or anyone else in Canada. You have fabricated again. I never said there's never been discrimination in Canada or anywhere else. What I did say is that Canada has offered Jews and for that matter all kinds of minorities freedom. Doesn't mean there wasn't and still aren't problems or discrimination. You appear unable to differentiate between actions of individuals and official state policies.

 

So canada isn't racist, but there needs to be a jewish state to defend jews from racist in Canada?  LOL, which one is it.  If Canada is racist enough to justify jews having a state, then it is racist enough to justify african canadian schools.

[marcus]

On 3/31/2017 at 11:17 AM, Rue said:

Its not difficult for me or anyone to go on the internet and realize that the Jews are Khazars myth is just that and has been repeated by individuals such as yourself who have an anti-Semitic agenda on web sites to attack Jews as not being a distinct people.

Its not difficult at all to deal with people with such agendas.

The agenda is the truth and to speak out against the lies and the distortions that zionism has created on the ever changing history of who and why the migration and colonization of Palestinian land has happened. Where every atrocity committed by Israel is somehow okay, because it's never Israel's fault. 

Khazars are not Semites. So your usage of the word makes very little sense. Anti-semitism is better described by looking at the treatment of Palestinians, the true Semites, by the European colonizers.

The eternal victims need to be treated differently than others and any challenge to the special treatment seems to create the screeching and long-winded of posts of anti-semitism. It's a good thing that this is changing. Many young Jews, living outside of Israel, cannot subscribe to the Zionism agenda anymore. This, plus the powerful BDSM movement will eventually end this long lasting injustice. 

[Argus]

13 minutes ago, marcus said:

The eternal victims need to be treated differently than others and any challenge to the special treatment seems to create the screeching and long-winded of posts of anti-semitism.

There is  a reason why certain individuals speak about 'atrocities' and 'slaughter' and 'genocide' in Palestine, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual situation on the ground. After all, to quote Sam Harris, we know what Israel would do if they had the military power to do whatever they wanted, because they're doing it. And yet, the number of Palestinians continues to grow, not shrink. He also makes the point that when it comes to fighting in densely populated urban environments civilian casualties are unavoidable, and yet Israel has put more effort into avoiding them than anyone in the history of warfare ever has, including us.

You need only compare how the Israelis fought in Gaza to what the Syrian and Russian governments are doing in Syria, or for that matter, what the Iraqi government is doing in Mosul, or what ISIS does.

The other part of that narrative of Harris' of course, is what would Hamas do if it had the power to? And we know that from their own founding documents. They would indeed commit genocide. They say so quite bluntly, and they kill any civilian Jew they can, and applaud the deaths of others. 

So how can we not call it antisemitism when someone focuses with such zealotry and outrage on Israel while exempting all other nations from a similar scrutiny? However much people try to weasel around what their motivations are by using words like 'Zionist' in place of 'Jew', we still know where they're coming from.

 

Edited April 3, 2017 by Argus

[taxme]

On 3/31/2017 at 11:35 AM, DogOnPorch said:

It's a cold world, Rue. But allies come in the strangest forms.

But, oh yes, by golly! Enemies all around!

----------

Danny Dravot: Billy Fish, do they always use such a big ball?
Billy Fish: Depend on size of man's head. Big head, big ball, small head, small ball. That's your Bashki man. Oh, big damn head!

Trying to bring civilization to a backwards 10th century religious bunch of fanatics will never work in any of those Arab countries. Any religion that calls itself a peaceful religion is lying to us all. The only religion that appears to still enjoy cutting off heads, drowning and throwing people off roofs and treating their women like chit s the Islamic religion. A religion that should be made illegal in Canada. There was no problem with our western elites to get rid of apartheid in South Africa so why don't these same out standing elites now do the same thing to many of those Arab countries that still practice barbarism? The western world is being led by a bunch of out of control lunatics. 

[taxme]

4 hours ago, marcus said:

The agenda is the truth and to speak out against the lies and the distortions that zionism has created on the ever changing history of who and why the migration and colonization of Palestinian land has happened. Where every atrocity committed by Israel is somehow okay, because it's never Israel's fault. 

Khazars are not Semites. So your usage of the word makes very little sense. Anti-semitism is better described by looking at the treatment of Palestinians, the true Semites, by the European colonizers.

The eternal victims need to be treated differently than others and any challenge to the special treatment seems to create the screeching and long-winded of posts of anti-semitism. It's a good thing that this is changing. Many young Jews, living outside of Israel, cannot subscribe to the Zionism agenda anymore. This, plus the powerful BDSM movement will eventually end this long lasting injustice. 

It would appear as though Israel and zionism is the problem in the world. Take away their political power, and their political control, and their run of just about everything in the world, and their should be peace on earth. The ordinary Jewish person doesn't realize or know that they are being used by those two cabal trouble makers for their own gain. When the ordinary Jewish person starts to get this, the cabals evil reign will come to an end.  

[Argus]

22 minutes ago, taxme said:

It would appear as though Israel and zionism is the problem in the world.

Really? There are 15 million Jews in the world and 1.6 BILLION Muslims. The problem is the Jews?

"Why we hate you and why we fight you" - by ISIS

1. We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah – whether you realize it or not – by making partners for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him, claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all manner of devilish practices. It is for this reason that we were commanded to openly declare our hatred for you and our enmity towards you. “There has already been for you an excellent example in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah. We have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone’” (Al-Mumtahanah 4). Furthermore, just as your disbelief is the primary reason we hate you, your disbelief is the primary reason we fight you, as we have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah – for those afforded this option – and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims. Thus, even if you were to stop fighting us, your best-case scenario in a state of war would be that we would suspend our attacks against you – if we deemed it necessary – in order to focus on the closer and more immediate threats, before eventually resuming our campaigns against you. Apart from the option of a temporary truce, this is the only likely scenario that would bring you fleeting respite from our attacks. So in the end, you cannot bring an indefinite halt to our war against you. At most, you could only delay it temporarily. “And fight them until there is no fitnah [paganism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Al-Baqarah 193).

 

2 . We hate you because your secular, liberal societies permit the very things that Allah has prohibited while banning many of the things He has permitted, a matter that doesn’t concern you because you separate between religion and state, thereby granting supreme authority to your whims and desires via the legislators you vote into power. In doing so, you desire to rob Allah of His right to be obeyed and you wish to usurp that right for yourselves. “Legislation is not but for Allah” (Yusuf 40). Your secular liberalism has led you to tolerate and even support “gay rights,” to allow alcohol, drugs, fornication, gambling, and usury to become widespread, and to encourage the people to mock those who denounce these filthy sins and vices. As such, we wage war against you to stop you from spreading your disbelief and debauchery – your secularism and nationalism, your perverted liberal values, your Christianity and atheism – and all the depravity and corruption they entail. You’ve made it your mission to “liberate” Muslim societies; we’ve made it our mission to fight off your influence and protect mankind from your misguided concepts and your deviant way of life.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/07/31/isis-why-we-hate-you-why-we-fight-you/

[taxme]

2 minutes ago, Argus said:

Really? There are 15 million Jews in the world and 1.6 BILLION Muslims. The problem is the Jews?

"Why we hate you and why we fight you" - by ISIS

1. We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah – whether you realize it or not – by making partners for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him, claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all manner of devilish practices. It is for this reason that we were commanded to openly declare our hatred for you and our enmity towards you. “There has already been for you an excellent example in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah. We have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone’” (Al-Mumtahanah 4). Furthermore, just as your disbelief is the primary reason we hate you, your disbelief is the primary reason we fight you, as we have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah – for those afforded this option – and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims. Thus, even if you were to stop fighting us, your best-case scenario in a state of war would be that we would suspend our attacks against you – if we deemed it necessary – in order to focus on the closer and more immediate threats, before eventually resuming our campaigns against you. Apart from the option of a temporary truce, this is the only likely scenario that would bring you fleeting respite from our attacks. So in the end, you cannot bring an indefinite halt to our war against you. At most, you could only delay it temporarily. “And fight them until there is no fitnah [paganism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Al-Baqarah 193).

 

2 . We hate you because your secular, liberal societies permit the very things that Allah has prohibited while banning many of the things He has permitted, a matter that doesn’t concern you because you separate between religion and state, thereby granting supreme authority to your whims and desires via the legislators you vote into power. In doing so, you desire to rob Allah of His right to be obeyed and you wish to usurp that right for yourselves. “Legislation is not but for Allah” (Yusuf 40). Your secular liberalism has led you to tolerate and even support “gay rights,” to allow alcohol, drugs, fornication, gambling, and usury to become widespread, and to encourage the people to mock those who denounce these filthy sins and vices. As such, we wage war against you to stop you from spreading your disbelief and debauchery – your secularism and nationalism, your perverted liberal values, your Christianity and atheism – and all the depravity and corruption they entail. You’ve made it your mission to “liberate” Muslim societies; we’ve made it our mission to fight off your influence and protect mankind from your misguided concepts and your deviant way of life.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/07/31/isis-why-we-hate-you-why-we-fight-you/

ISIS is nothing more than a CIA formed gang of nut balls created to cause total havoc and chaos in the Middle East. From internet reports Israel, America, and Saudi Arabia pay for their weapons for total chaos and total destruction. The main aim is Syria, and trying to oust Assad, and be able to put their own dictator into power like they did in Libya and Iraq who will obey the wishes of the zionist elite. Really. 

In case that you are not aware of it, in most cases in the world there always is a small minority that always get to run and rule over the majority. It appears as though zionists are the minority running the majority. Really.  

[Argus]

2 hours ago, taxme said:

ISIS is nothing more than a CIA formed gang of nut balls created to cause total havoc and chaos in the Middle East.

Probably controlled by Jews, eh?

[taxme]

4 hours ago, Argus said:

Probably controlled by Jews, eh?

Maybe the zionist ones. Hey, you never know.   

[marcus]

9 hours ago, Argus said:

Probably controlled by Jews, eh?

ISIS is not controlled by "Jews". They are controlled, or at least heavily funded by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. It just happens that Saudi Arabia is now in bed with Israel, who is whispering sweet sweet words to it. Mostly with: "you keep the chaos going and keep resisting Iran and we will make sure the American congress continues to shower you with weapons and we will make sure that they will never criticize you!"

 

[marcus]

16 hours ago, Argus said:

You need only compare how the Israelis fought in Gaza to what the Syrian and Russian governments are doing in Syria, or for that matter, what the Iraqi government is doing in Mosul, or what ISIS does.

So this is what it has come down to? Compare Israel to Syrian and Russian governments and the Gazans to ISIS?

You go on and live in your simplistic world. I have no time for that.

[Argus]

7 hours ago, marcus said:

So this is what it has come down to? Compare Israel to Syrian and Russian governments and the Gazans to ISIS?

When I see people who could not possibly care less about the slaughter of anyone around the world for any reason, who never mention it, never post about it, never show the slightest interest in any kind of human rights abuses, including the gassing of Syrian civilians as mentioned in today's papers, then go into fits of outrage whenever there is a violent interaction involving Israel, it doesn't take a great leap of the imagination to figure out that the issue for some has nothing to do with any care for human rights. Nor does it take much of a leap of logic to figure out what does piss them off.

Jews.

 

 

[H10]

On 4/3/2017 at 0:50 PM, marcus said:

The agenda is the truth and to speak out against the lies and the distortions that zionism has created on the ever changing history of who and why the migration and colonization of Palestinian land has happened. Where every atrocity committed by Israel is somehow okay, because it's never Israel's fault. 

Khazars are not Semites. So your usage of the word makes very little sense. Anti-semitism is better described by looking at the treatment of Palestinians, the true Semites, by the European colonizers.

The eternal victims need to be treated differently than others and any challenge to the special treatment seems to create the screeching and long-winded of posts of anti-semitism. It's a good thing that this is changing. Many young Jews, living outside of Israel, cannot subscribe to the Zionism agenda anymore. This, plus the powerful BDSM movement will eventually end this long lasting injustice. 

This is obviously true.  The only anti-semitism I am seeing is against the Palestinians and Canaanites and african  jews who are all treated as 3rd class citizens in Israel.

[H10]

23 hours ago, taxme said:

Trying to bring civilization to a backwards 10th century religious bunch of fanatics will never work in any of those Arab countries. Any religion that calls itself a peaceful religion is lying to us all. The only religion that appears to still enjoy cutting off heads, drowning and throwing people off roofs and treating their women like chit s the Islamic religion. A religion that should be made illegal in Canada. There was no problem with our western elites to get rid of apartheid in South Africa so why don't these same out standing elites now do the same thing to many of those Arab countries that still practice barbarism? The western world is being led by a bunch of out of control lunatics. 

Any time the arab countries elect a secular government we fight with them. After nile valley civilizations, most of the first civilizations that were ration based start in the middle east.  Middle East had alot of civilizations before most other parts of the world.  However, we are always bumping heads with the secular government in the arab world because they undermine our goals of greater control of the middle east.  Right now the western nations are or have recently been bumping heads with egypt (under secular mubarak), turkey, iran, iraq (under saddam), syria, Libya (under gaddafi).  These were not the radical islamic nations, they were more secular leaning with turkey and egypt being the most moderate.  We then buddied up with the saudis, emiratis, omanis, afghanis, pakistanis and other countries where they still behead people.  The West has determine it is easier and better to work with radical muslims over secular muslims, and in the case of Saddam and gaddafi, replaced secular government with religious ones.  Don't blame the muslims for it, we invaded them and overthrow their secular governments and replace them with radicals.  We should be asking why did Harper and Bush and Obama do this?

[taxme]

13 hours ago, marcus said:

ISIS is not controlled by "Jews". They are controlled, or at least heavily funded by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. It just happens that Saudi Arabia is now in bed with Israel, who is whispering sweet sweet words to it. Mostly with: "you keep the chaos going and keep resisting Iran and we will make sure the American congress continues to shower you with weapons and we will make sure that they will never criticize you!"

 

Yup, that just about sums it up alright. 

[Rue]

On ‎2017‎-‎04‎-‎01 at 3:25 PM, hernanday said:

So canada isn't racist, but there needs to be a jewish state to defend jews from racist in Canada?  LOL, which one is it.  If Canada is racist enough to justify jews having a state, then it is racist enough to justify african canadian schools.

I did not say Canada is not racist. You inferred that. Everyone on the planet especially you is racist. We all are. Its human nature that relates back to our primal pack behaviour.

Where your brain deciphered from my responses that I denied racism exists or any ism exists only you will know. Just like your second inference that I said Israel was created to defend Jews from  racists in Canada. To start with  you erroneously keep referring to we Jews as a race, I don't, Next Israel was not created to defend Jews aganst Canada. What a ridiculous thing to say let alone claim I said.  Your inferences are very bizarre indeed. You don't read you invent as you go along.In fact I said there is no justification for any minority in Canada to have their own school because they fear bigotry.

[Rue]

34 minutes ago, taxme said:

Yup, that just about sums it up alright. 

No its wrong. I finance them with the illuminati, Taylor Swift,  the Masons, Zionists, and Argus' vast amounts of wealth.

I knew a Mason once. His first name was Perry. He was  a lawyer. He ended up in a wheelchair in San Fransisco. Years later he went from being a white man to a black man. Quite the man.

Edited April 4, 2017 by Rue

[Rue]

3 hours ago, hernanday said:

Any time the arab countries elect a secular government we fight with them. After nile valley civilizations, most of the first civilizations that were ration based start in the middle east.  Middle East had alot of civilizations before most other parts of the world.  However, we are always bumping heads with the secular government in the arab world because they undermine our goals of greater control of the middle east.  Right now the western nations are or have recently been bumping heads with egypt (under secular mubarak), turkey, iran, iraq (under saddam), syria, Libya (under gaddafi).  These were not the radical islamic nations, they were more secular leaning with turkey and egypt being the most moderate.  We then buddied up with the saudis, emiratis, omanis, afghanis, pakistanis and other countries where they still behead people.  The West has determine it is easier and better to work with radical muslims over secular muslims, and in the case of Saddam and gaddafi, replaced secular government with religious ones.  Don't blame the muslims for it, we invaded them and overthrow their secular governments and replace them with radicals.  We should be asking why did Harper and Bush and Obama do this?

Harper? Obama? It was me and Argus. Stop being so silly.

[Rue]

3 hours ago, hernanday said:

This is obviously true.  The only anti-semitism I am seeing is against the Palestinians and Canaanites and african  jews who are all treated as 3rd class citizens in Israel.

Yah you see things. You see Canaanites. Uh yah. I see things. Its usually idiots. Interesting. You have a point?

Edited April 4, 2017 by Rue

[Rue]

6 hours ago, Argus said:

When I see people who could not possibly care less about the slaughter of anyone around the world for any reason, who never mention it, never post about it, never show the slightest interest in any kind of human rights abuses, including the gassing of Syrian civilians as mentioned in today's papers, then go into fits of outrage whenever there is a violent interaction involving Israel, it doesn't take a great leap of the imagination to figure out that the issue for some has nothing to do with any care for human rights. Nor does it take much of a leap of logic to figure out what does piss them off.

Jews.

 

 

Lol sometimes your bluntness is well timed..

Regards Rue the Canaaanite or is that Dynamite

 

[taxme]

3 hours ago, hernanday said:

Any time the arab countries elect a secular government we fight with them. After nile valley civilizations, most of the first civilizations that were ration based start in the middle east.  Middle East had alot of civilizations before most other parts of the world.  However, we are always bumping heads with the secular government in the arab world because they undermine our goals of greater control of the middle east.  Right now the western nations are or have recently been bumping heads with egypt (under secular mubarak), turkey, iran, iraq (under saddam), syria, Libya (under gaddafi).  These were not the radical islamic nations, they were more secular leaning with turkey and egypt being the most moderate.  We then buddied up with the saudis, emiratis, omanis, afghanis, pakistanis and other countries where they still behead people.  The West has determine it is easier and better to work with radical muslims over secular muslims, and in the case of Saddam and gaddafi, replaced secular government with religious ones.  Don't blame the muslims for it, we invaded them and overthrow their secular governments and replace them with radicals.  We should be asking why did Harper and Bush and Obama do this?

I agree. What needs to be done here is for every western nation to get the hell out of the Middle East, and let them continue on with their ways of doing things. We don't need their oil or sand. We need to just get the hell out of there. That should hopefully stop all of this so-called refugee nonsense from all of those so-called refugee countriesrefugees immigrating to the West. And the West really does need a break. But try to stop the warmongering corporations, and the bankster elites who are obviously making billions of bucks off of the rest of the world's misery that have been forced on them by these warmongering a-holes. Our politicians are responsible for a lot of this misery only because they do not work for you and me, they work for the dark state government. 

 

 

[taxme]

13 minutes ago, Rue said:

No its wrong. I finance them with the illuminati, Taylor Swift,  the Masons, Zionists, and Argus' vast amounts of wealth.

I knew a Mason once. His first name was Perry. He was  a lawyer. He ended up in a wheelchair in San Fransisco. Years later he went from being a white man to a black man. Quite the man.

You sound over tired to me? Have you not been getting much sleep these days because sometimes you just don't make any sense at all. 

[Rue]

8 minutes ago, taxme said:

You sound over tired to me? Have you not been getting much sleep these days because sometimes you just don't make any sense at all. 

Yah I know you still can't figure out  why Tim Horton's roll up the rim contest doesn't apply to Jews let alone the dark side of Ironside.. Lol tiresome never. Amazing you bet. Guess you didn't see Perry in Tehran hmmm?

Regards

Hamilton Burger

Edited April 5, 2017 by Rue

[H10]

7 hours ago, Rue said:

I did not say Canada is not racist. You inferred that. Everyone on the planet especially you is racist. We all are. Its human nature that relates back to our primal pack behaviour.

Where your brain deciphered from my responses that I denied racism exists or any ism exists only you will know. Just like your second inference that I said Israel was created to defend Jews from  racists in Canada. To start with  you erroneously keep referring to we Jews as a race, I don't, Next Israel was not created to defend Jews aganst Canada. What a ridiculous thing to say let alone claim I said.  Your inferences are very bizarre indeed. You don't read you invent as you go along.In fact I said there is no justification for any minority in Canada to have their own school because they fear bigotry.

You said jews were discriminated against in every country including Canada,but since you now admit jews are not discriminated against and never have been in any meaningful way in Canada, I am sure you agree Israel shouldn't exist because since Jews can have a safe homeland in Canada with little relative discrimination, there is no reason for them to be on stolen Palestinian lands right?  I already provided quotes from peer reviewed research and hareets showing jews view themselves as a race.  If jews are not a race, then Hitler and the Nazis are not racist for targetting jews, because they aren't a race.  Which simply goes to show there is no need for Israel to exist as some kind of safeland for the jewish race, since you admit jews are not a race right?  If they are not a race, then it is not "Racist" to be prejudiced towards jews.  In fact, if the hatred of jews is based on their BELIEFS and not on them being race, it is actually impossible for anyone to be racist against jews.  And what is wrong with hating people for their beliefs?  Which I am not sure which beliefs it is the jews of Israel share since about half of them are athiest coming from former communist russia.  Then you agree there is no justification for jews to have a state because they fear some form of bigotry.