HybridConservative Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Simple question: Do you think that the new BYOW is a good legislation to continue with? *curious to know what others think--just had a debate about this at a seminar* ~H.C p.s that should say LIQUOR lol my bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maplesyrup Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 BYOW. Are you refering to legislation that will allow patrons to bring their own bottles of wine, whatever, into a restaurant and have it opened and glasses provided, so that the patrons may consume it on the premises? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridConservative Posted November 12, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 That I am Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Machine Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 We should keep the LCBo, it's fine how it's run right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridConservative Posted November 12, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 We are keeping the LCBO. It doesnt have anything to do with that. Its primarily whether people can bring their own, purchased wine into a restaurant and have it opened and drank there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maplesyrup Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Well, Quebec has been doing it for many years and it seems to be quite successful. It makes dining out more affordable, but I am curious about who is responsible for excessive drinking. In BC if you are serving alcohol and someone gets plastered and then has an automobile accident, the restaurant/bar owner and even the server/bartender can be held partially responsible depending on the circumstances. Prohibition didn't work for adults so why do we think it works for kids? I think a much healthier approach is to introduce alcohol gradually to kids, rather creating this suppressed desire to drink, and then the usual blowouts when they become of legal age to drink. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridConservative Posted November 12, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 I agree--holding firm to alchohol laws (being 19 in Ontario) is ridiculous. Lets look at it this way: We can marry at 18...but cant drink at our own wedding. There's something REALLY wrong with that. Though it is working in Quebec...look at Alberta. Only 66 restaurants actually have this licence and all report that it has not been very successful at all. Would it work in Ontario? I guess thats the question. Since it is voluntary for restaurant owners to apply for this license, its not exactly the most pressing issue. Just a good topic of conversation thanx for your input! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maplesyrup Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 If I were a cafe owner with no liquor license and then all of a sudden my patrons wanted to start drinking in my restuarant, I would have to arrange for the staff to go through some training to learn about cutting people off, etc.. How do you do that when it is their own liquor could turn out to be quite difficult, especially if they are drunk. Maybe that is the reason for the reluctance in AB. I wonder how it is addressed in Quebec. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Machine Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Lowering the drinking age would add like 800,000 new drunk driving accidents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesar Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 Yes, we don't need to lower the drinking age; raise the age of when you can marry. 25 should be right. As for bring your own booze into a restaurant; what's in it for the restaurant if they have to supply the glasses??? Is this restaurants that have a liquor license?? In my day< many many years ago, I worked in a restaurant; we would lose our liquor license if we knowing allowed anyone to bring booze in the restaurant. We had to be 21 to drink "legally" Actually when you reached the legal age; the fun went out of drinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maplesyrup Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 Do you really believe that underage teenagers don't drink alcohol? What planet do you live on? We are talking here about a restaurant that has a license for people to bring their own liquor, but the restaurant will supply the corkscrew and the glasses. Have you never experienced that in Montreal? Where have you been? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesar Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 Are you talking to me maple; should we condone and allow teenagers to do anything that we know they do. I suppose because they like to speed and drag race; we should okay that?????? I asked what does the restaurant get out of this???? Why would they want to supply you with glasses and corkscrew for your own booze???? Free???? Why would I want to go to Quebec????? Why make it cheaper and easier to drink away from home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maplesyrup Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 Quebeckers have beeen doing this for quite awhile. I am not aware of problems however I have not lived there for some time. You go to a couche-tard, pick up your bottle of wine, and then go to the restaurant for dinner. An advantage is that it makes dining out quite a bit less expensive. Jeez, why are anglos so uptight about things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesar Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 We are not nor do we aspire to be Quebeckers. Why should we do something just because they do? Get real. Next' people will want to bring their own steaks; all the restaurant need to do is cook it, serve it and do the dishes. If you can't afford the liquor to eat out; do without. Who needs a bunch of drunk drivers on the road. I don't need liquor to enjoy a meal out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August1991 Posted November 14, 2004 Report Share Posted November 14, 2004 As for bring your own booze into a restaurant; what's in it for the restaurant if they have to supply the glasses??? Is this restaurants that have a liquor license??Restaurants sometimes charge a cork fee. But in general, they are happy to sell the food.On one hand, the government loses tax revenue with this idea (since wine sold in restaurants is taxed at a higher rate). On the other hand, customers can take a specific bottle they prefer rather than be restricted to the restaurant's selection. Bear in mind that in Quebec, local corner stores can sell beer and wine. The restaurants offering BYOW are usually in the downtown with many little stores nearby. I've stepped out of a restaurant to buy a bottle of wine. Canada has a truly bizarre system for selling booze. I don't think any other country does it our way. Well, the UK used to have weird pub hours, the Scandinavians also restrict hours of sale and India has dry states. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesar Posted November 14, 2004 Report Share Posted November 14, 2004 The Campbell government has allowed some pubs to stay open until 4 am. It is a stupid and dangerous idea. There are shootings nearly every week end at these late hour pubs and the extra costs for policing are skyrocketing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.