Jump to content

UCCB payments - vote buying


Recommended Posts

Sounds like you've finally woken up to the fact that the Harperite bunch are as corrupt as any administration Canada has had, at least on modern history.

I wasn't making any claim that they weren't.

WWWTT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

imagine that! Two guys presuming to tie... directly tie and associate Ontario provincial and federal Liberal parties. And here I thought that argument would reflect upon position/policy - go figure. Is the Ontario PC party the same party as the federal CPC party... because Patrick Brown offers support to Stephen Harper? C'mon guys - try again... try harder!

In some specific situations a case can be made.

Justin was campaigning for Ontario liberal candidates more than once in bi elections, etc etc

regardless, it's not worth all that much of comment time.

WWWTT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to health care transfer payment cuts.

Something the federal liberals are famous for doing.

But the liberals never talk about how they are still responsible for something that they started. Hence the Canada that never was.

WWWTT

Huh. Maybe cuz the Liberals had a string of surpluses. Which they gave to the Conservatives. Who promptly turned it into a string of deficits. But hey, they're the competent financial managers, right?

:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imagine that! Two guys presuming to tie... directly tie and associate Ontario provincial and federal Liberal parties. And here I thought that argument would reflect upon position/policy - go figure.

In what way are are they significantly different?

For me, personally, Trudeau's enthusiastic embracing of every left wing fad policy, with a total absence of thought as to consequences, strikes me as eerily similar to Dalton McGuinty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh. Maybe cuz the Liberals had a string of surpluses. Which they gave to the Conservatives. Who promptly turned it into a string of deficits. But hey, they're the competent financial managers, right?

:unsure:

Yes, they are. The Liberals had surpluses because the economy was booming, and because Jean Chretien just did not give a DAMN about serious problems in the country as long as the opposition was weak and divided. He wasn't going to spend money until presented with a serious political threat. He wanted a big surplus to play with for when that happened. Of course, he actually spent most of the surplus when he realized Martin was kicking him out, because he didn't want to leave Martin much to play with. Then Martin, Mister Stingy, made huge and expensive promises in the following election, which he lost anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they are. The Liberals had surpluses because the economy was booming, and because Jean Chretien just did not give a DAMN about serious problems in the country as long as the opposition was weak and divided. He wasn't going to spend money until presented with a serious political threat. He wanted a big surplus to play with for when that happened. Of course, he actually spent most of the surplus when he realized Martin was kicking him out, because he didn't want to leave Martin much to play with. Then Martin, Mister Stingy, made huge and expensive promises in the following election, which he lost anyway.

Hogwash. They created the problem with a poorly conceived and ill-timed cut to the GST. Then they proceeded to abandon their own core principles with the stimulus plan. And the stimulus plan itself with the most partisan process in living memory.

Principled and thinking conservatives have no time for this government. The very best they can come up with is that they think maybe it wasn't as bad as the LIberals. And even that line is highly dubious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case all you people who worship at the throne of Stephen Harper forgot, here is a handy list of Canadian Government scandals. The portion of the list that is allocated to the current bunch of ethically challenged ideologues is impressively long, though still incomplete. It doesn't include Del Mastro's criminal election fraud, for example, or Peter McKay's misuse of a military helicopter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh. All of them, maybe, in living memory. I'm trying to think of the last Federal cabinet minister that went to prison. I'm drawing a blank. Although Mulroney should have.

No tory cabinet minister went to prison. Apparently to you a guy who spends too much of his own money on an election is worse than people taking bags full of money under the table in shady Italian restaurants, or using government money to pay off their business partners, as Chretien did. Apparently that's worse than taking millions from government vendors, after you retire, of course, as Mulroney did. Apparently it's worse than the letting a campaign donor get huge, overpriced government contracts to deliver goods, as Trudeau did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case all you people who worship at the throne of Stephen Harper forgot, here is a handy list of Canadian Government scandals. The portion of the list that is allocated to the current bunch of ethically challenged ideologues is impressively long, though still incomplete. It doesn't include Del Mastro's criminal election fraud, for example, or Peter McKay's misuse of a military helicopter.

It's kind of a pathetic list, obviously put in by a young editor who doesn't remember much of the Chretien or Mulroney years, and nothing of the Trudeau years.

They seem to have forgotten Chretien's HRDC scandal, for one, and the BDBC scandal, not to mention the coverup over the Somali inquiry and tainted blood scandal. Oh, and let's not forget the firearms registry scandal. There's probably lots more but I can't immediately remember them.

Edited by Argus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No tory cabinet minister went to prison. Apparently to you a guy who spends too much of his own money on an election is worse than people taking bags full of money under the table in shady Italian restaurants, or using government money to pay off their business partners, as Chretien did. Apparently that's worse than taking millions from government vendors, after you retire, of course, as Mulroney did. Apparently it's worse than the letting a campaign donor get huge, overpriced government contracts to deliver goods, as Trudeau did.

You have heard of Dean Del Mastro, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When ever a Tory MP gets on TV, they keep saying they care about taxpayers money BUT with a chance of the PM seeing the GG on Sunday, they will be spending double the amount of our money for an election, to get an edge on the other two parties and to stop any of those ads coming from other groups against the Tories. So all those people getting cheques in the mail, enjoy them because ALL of us will be paying more taxes down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When ever a Tory MP gets on TV, they keep saying they care about taxpayers money BUT with a chance of the PM seeing the GG on Sunday, they will be spending double the amount of our money for an election, to get an edge on the other two parties and to stop any of those ads coming from other groups against the Tories. So all those people getting cheques in the mail, enjoy them because ALL of us will be paying more taxes down the road.

The cheques are just another example of slimy Harper underhandedness. What they've actually done is replace the old child tax credit with the UCCB. It's a bit of sleight of hand that allows them to give money in a very obvious way while taking it back in a way most people won't see. It's beneath contempt. It works because most people are too busy or not interested enough to pay attention.

It makes me despair for democracy. If people aren't bright enough or can't be bothered to see through this transparently dishonest behavior, what hope is there to elect an honest government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could try but I still couldn't match the people who will support Harper no matter how corrupt he gets.

Unhuh, yet you don't seem to understand why the others don't vote for the club that might want you as a member, and while your busy believing in your superiority and being outraged while looking foolish doing so, the evil empire has been winning elections for the last decade. Many of you believed the CPC's were evil even before they got elected the first time, some of you fully bought into the troops in the streets, women in the kitchen, ban abortion, ban gay marriage, private health care, etc, evil agenda, none of which was true, and now you have been beating the same desiccated horse for 10 years, a winning strategy? Perhaps not. Unless your goal is to appear ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much tax do you think poor people pay?

I don't know, how much do you think? Give it a rest, it has next to little impact on how the vote buying system with this issue is working. I doubt a lot of poor people are going to be convinced to vote for Harper over this deal. People who don't need the money, maybe so, or at least until they see it gets mostly all clawed back at tax time.

Edited by On Guard for Thee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cheques are just another example of slimy Harper underhandedness. What they've actually done is replace the old child tax credit with the UCCB. It's a bit of sleight of hand that allows them to give money in a very obvious way while taking it back in a way most people won't see. It's beneath contempt. It works because most people are too busy or not interested enough to pay attention.

It makes me despair for democracy. If people aren't bright enough or can't be bothered to see through this transparently dishonest behavior, what hope is there to elect an honest government?

You are going to be soooo angry when the NDP spends our money on a day care program, and imagine those stupid people who voted for them because they offered it, they might even use it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,731
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Michael234
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • lahr earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • lahr earned a badge
      First Post
    • User went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...