Je suis Omar Posted May 14, 2015 Report Posted May 14, 2015 (edited) Gee, I wonder what that could be. g. Your appalling and shameful ignorance. Noam Chomsky: The Long, Shameful History of American Terrorism President Obama should call our countrys history of supporting insurgents abroad for what it is: U.S.-backed terrorism. BY NOAM CHOMSKY ... In Cuba, after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, President John F. Kennedy launched a murderous and destructive campaign to bring the terrors of the earth to Cubathe words of Kennedy's close associate, the historian Arthur Schlesinger, in his semiofficial biography of Robert Kennedy, who was assigned responsibility for the terrorist war. The atrocities against Cuba were severe. The plans were for the terrorism to culminate in an uprising in October 1962, which would lead to a U.S. invasion. By now, scholarship recognizes that this was one reason why Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev placed missiles in Cuba, initiating a crisis that came perilously close to nuclear war. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara later conceded that if he had been a Cuban leader, he might have expected a U.S. invasion. American terrorist attacks against Cuba continued for more than 30 years. The cost to Cubans was of course harsh. The accounts of the victims, hardly ever heard in the U.S., were reported in detail for the first time in a study by Canadian scholar Keith Bolender, Voices From the Other Side: An Oral History of Terrorism Against Cuba, in 2010. The toll of the long terrorist war was amplified by a crushing embargo, which continues even today in defiance of the world. On Oct. 28, the U.N., for the 23rd time, endorsed the necessity of ending the economic, commercial, financial blockade imposed by the United States against Cuba. The vote was 188 to 2 (U.S., Israel), with three U.S. Pacific Island dependencies abstaining. There is by now some opposition to the embargo in high places in the U.S., reports ABC News, because it is no longer useful (citing Hillary Clinton's new book Hard Choices). French scholar Salim Lamrani reviews the bitter costs to Cubans in his 2013 book The Economic War Against Cuba. ... http://inthesetimes.com/article/17311/noam_chomsky_the_worlds_greatest_terrorist_campaign Edited May 14, 2015 by Je suis Omar Quote
jbg Posted May 14, 2015 Report Posted May 14, 2015 There is less chance of triggering these lone wolves if we stay out of these never-ending, useless military attacks that do not accomplish anything but to make weapons companies' stock prices to remain high. You always need an enemy or create an enemy to have wars. So what you're saying is that we should craft policies to soothe the emotions of the crazed? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
marcus Posted May 14, 2015 Report Posted May 14, 2015 (edited) So what you're saying is that we should craft policies to soothe the emotions of the crazed? No. That's what you're saying. I am saying that we should have policies that don't destroy countries (Afghanistan/Iraq/Libya/Syria) which encourage terrorism. Similar to what Switzerland has in its foreign policy. Unless you have stocks in weapons companies, I don't see why you would want these unnecessary wars that do not solve any problems. Edited May 14, 2015 by marcus Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
Shady Posted May 14, 2015 Report Posted May 14, 2015 I would say that the long term should be fairly positive if other religions are any indication. Quote
Argus Posted May 14, 2015 Report Posted May 14, 2015 No. That's what you're saying. I am saying that we should have policies that don't destroy countries (Afghanistan/Iraq/Libya/Syria) which encourage terrorism. But all those countries encouraged and supported terrorism in the first place. That's kind of a big reason why they drew the antipathy of the West. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.