Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks Topaz. Excellent interview conducted by Steve Paiken - well worth watching......Paiken picks apart much of what Harris says in what Paiken says is a very "one-sided" book. Harris came off looking like a bitter, Harper-hating "journalist". Paiken embarrassed him - not because he was partisan (clearly he is not) - but because Harris' arguments just didn't stand up. Here's a link:

http://tvo.org/video/212620/michael-harris-harper-hot-seat

A little redundant I suppose. He akes a nuber of points about Harper we have known for some time.

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

All one need do is tune into QP a time or two, especially when Mulcair is trying to exact an actual answer to a question, and youll see how much Harper doesnt care about words. Or at least any that go anywhere outside the pre scripted talking points.

The purpose of question period, at least as far as the opposition are concerned, is not to get answers from the government. The purpose is to embarrass the government and make it look bad. Thus the government's purpose is to not make itself look bad, but to instead make the opposition look bad.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

The purpose of question period, at least as far as the opposition are concerned, is not to get answers from the government. The purpose is to embarrass the government and make it look bad. Thus the government's purpose is to not make itself look bad, but to instead make the opposition look bad.

Exactly. And so far Harper is losing that battle most times I have seen it. Most recently on questions from Mulcair about Duffy.

Posted

Exactly. And so far Harper is losing that battle most times I have seen it. Most recently on questions from Mulcair about Duffy.

And yet, as of now, he's winning the battle.

Posted

Exactly. And so far Harper is losing that battle most times I have seen it. Most recently on questions from Mulcair about Duffy.

I think you are too much the ideological partisan to give an accurate assessment of that.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I think you are too much the ideological partisan to give an accurate assessment of that.

Said the giant kettle to the little pot.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...