Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Remember those "firefights" - Canadian soldiers returning fire near the frontlines in Iraq? Remember how the CBC and others made a big deal of how Obama said there were no US troops involved in combat - so why are Canadians there? Even today, the drumbeat goes on that Harper misled Parliament....that he lied. Well. turns out it was Obama who was the real liar. An article that appeared in The Star print edition game from a US paper - and here's what it said:

U.S. military advisors are also on the scene, some outfitted in Kurdish peshmerga uniforms, though "Jack" and others encountered on the front lines declined to be interviewed.


Link: http://www.vagazette.com/la-fg-isis-kurdistan-20150315,0,687361.story

Edited by Keepitsimple

Back to Basics

Posted

BC, EXACTLY is the Mission and why is the Iraq, to keep the war going, since most the NATO have supplied ISIS with weapons. Why? Could it be to destroy the area and killed as many people in the ME, so NATO countries, especially the USA can get the natural resources and to control and setup its friendly government. Russia, Syria, North Korea and China are still on the list but the ME is the first on the agenda. After Bill C-51 is law, I won't be able to say such things online, without a knock on my door.

Posted

BC, EXACTLY is the Mission and why is the Iraq, to keep the war going, since most the NATO have supplied ISIS with weapons. Why? Could it be to destroy the area and killed as many people in the ME....

Nope....there are far easier ways to do that if killing as many people as possible was the goal.

The tactical mission is close air support and destruction of ISIS assets, lines of communication, logistics, etc. Strike missions against fixed and moving targets requires forward controllers, designators, and real-time eyes on the ground. That's why anybody who understands what the mission is would not be fooled by political rhetoric ("lies").

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

BC, EXACTLY is the Mission and why is the Iraq, to keep the war going, since most the NATO have supplied ISIS with weapons. Why? Could it be to destroy the area and killed as many people in the ME, so NATO countries, especially the USA can get the natural resources and to control and setup its friendly government. Russia, Syria, North Korea and China are still on the list but the ME is the first on the agenda. After Bill C-51 is law, I won't be able to say such things online, without a knock on my door.

Yeah, your comments could be construed detrimental to economic activity.

Posted

Topaz, you need to read a article by Anthony Furey, called Harper Derangement Syndrome epidemic. You might learn something or at least sleep at nite.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted (edited)

Topaz, you need to read a article by Anthony Furey, called Harper Derangement Syndrome epidemic. You might learn something or at least sleep at nite.

Harper brought it on himself. If he was not leading the country in the right direction then we'd have no problem. But because of constant influence from, and obligations to other nation states in organizations like NATO we go along to get along. Canada is a follower, the UK is our master.

I would also point to John Key in New Zealand who recently implemented similar security measures. I seriously think many need to see what is going on in other commonwealth nations to undertand there is a concerted effort to bring all these nations in line with a streamlines intelligence and police apparatus. All while working with each other to accomplish just that.

Edited by GostHacked

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...