Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Take a look at their respective budgets and you too may begin to comprehend the word. As Mulcair pointed out, there are more staff at the parliamentary cafeteria than at SIRC.

It would be nice if you supported your conention with a link that shows how the SIRC budget has been gutted. Perhaps you might be right - I'm just asking that you support your assertion. Make sense?

Back to Basics

Posted

Apparently what?? Is this what you believe?

He has couched what he is doing in language to make his base, and other tin hat wearers, that they need his new law to keep them safe. But the potential outcome is exactly as you described it.

So...yes, that is what you believe? I'm not sure why you're having issues answering the question directly. If it's what you believe, just own it.

I personally think that this viewpoint is short-sighted and shows very little regard the views of Canadians, assuming Harper is controlling the majority of the population through fear. I believe I understand your view on this, and can only offer to you that it may be worth reviewing this perspective and confirm who exactly is wearing the tin hat.

Posted

I personally think that this viewpoint is short-sighted and shows very little regard the views of Canadians, assuming Harper is controlling the majority of the population through fear.

I don't think he's controlling the population through fear, but it's not for a lack of trying.

Posted

So...yes, that is what you believe? I'm not sure why you're having issues answering the question directly. If it's what you believe, just own it.

I personally think that this viewpoint is short-sighted and shows very little regard the views of Canadians, assuming Harper is controlling the majority of the population through fear. I believe I understand your view on this, and can only offer to you that it may be worth reviewing this perspective and confirm who exactly is wearing the tin hat.

I just answered the question. I have read the law and have listened to the many critiques of it from legal experts. I am aware of the statistics of the actual threat of terrorism, and I ca easily see how this bill could easily be misused against peoples charter rights. Yep, I have a pretty good handle on who is wearing the tin hats. Harper keeps appealing to them with his rants about jihadis declaring war on us.

Posted (edited)

I don't think he's controlling the population through fear, but it's not for a lack of trying.

Apparently OGFT does, and that destroying their freedom is going to win him an election.

Edited by Spiderfish
Posted

Yep, I have a pretty good handle on who is wearing the tin hats. Harper keeps appealing to them with his rants about jihadis declaring war on us.

Apparently - according to you - the vast majority of Canadians are wearing tinfoil hats. But hey - keep trying to convince us that ISIS and the Jihadists have NOT declared war on the West. Our own tiny little Neville Chamberlain! <_<

Back to Basics

Posted

Apparently - according to you - the vast majority of Canadians are wearing tinfoil hats. But hey - keep trying to convince us that ISIS and the Jihadists have NOT declared war on the West. Our own tiny little Neville Chamberlain!

I am certainly no fan of ISIS or any other such group. I just dont like the rush to judgement that C 51 is going to do anything more than what we already have on the books is already doing. And it opens up th potential for all kinds of abuse. So in effect, it could have a much more deleterious effect on us than them

Posted (edited)

I am certainly no fan of ISIS or any other such group. I just dont like the rush to judgement that C 51 is going to do anything more than what we already have on the books is already doing. And it opens up th potential for all kinds of abuse. So in effect, it could have a much more deleterious effect on us than them

You're entitled to your opinion but there's no need for you to pompously ridicule that large majority of Canadians who disagree with you as tinfoil hats.

Edited by Keepitsimple

Back to Basics

Posted

You're entitled to your opinion but there's no need for you to pompously ridicule that large majority of Canadians who disagree with you as tinfoil hats.

Or imply that the majority of Canadians are a society of mindless oafs being controlled through fear by Harper to achieve his grand Orwellian plan to strip all freedoms from the citizens that have been given to us and fought for by our brave, intelligent ancestors before us. Tin hat doesn't even come close, better get out the mylar space blanket.

Posted

Or imply that the majority of Canadians are a society of mindless oafs being controlled through fear by Harper to achieve his grand Orwellian plan to strip all freedoms from the citizens that have been given to us and fought for by our brave, intelligent ancestors before us. Tin hat doesn't even come close, better get out the mylar space blanket.

So you dont think Harper is flogging fear to try and garner support for his bill I take it...

Posted

So you dont think Harper is flogging fear to try and garner support for his bill I take it...

. Our PM is merely telling the truth about terrorism. Thankfully the PM isn't prepared to stick his head in the sand, putting Canadians at risk. The left is prepared to do nothing instead the left would like to understand ISIS and Al-Shabab and that way they wouldn't want to attack Canada anymore. To the left they just need a hug.

Thankfully, the vast majority of Canadians support this bill and the PM can only pray that the left makes terrorism an election issue. They will be handing the PM another sure victory. The other two are weak on terrorism and weak on crime.

Posted

. Our PM is merely telling the truth about terrorism. Thankfully the PM isn't prepared to stick his head in the sand, putting Canadians at risk. The left is prepared to do nothing instead the left would like to understand ISIS and Al-Shabab and that way they wouldn't want to attack Canada anymore. To the left they just need a hug.

Thankfully, the vast majority of Canadians support this bill and the PM can only pray that the left makes terrorism an election issue. They will be handing the PM another sure victory. The other two are weak on terrorism and weak on crime.

We already have laws that already work. The left cautiously approaches a law that very well may not work, but may degrade our human rights, with trepidation. You should be thankful there are those who will try and protect you from unwittingly giving away those rights, at least without anybody riding shotgun. (Its called oversight)

Posted

Is this an attempt to convey some sort of message...

It's not really that difficult, pretty self explanatory actually.

I certainly do not believe that a sound election strategy is to strip Canadians of their rights and freedoms, and I think Harper is smart enough to understand that this would not be an efficient platform on which to base an election. I also have a little more faith in the voting public than you and believe that if this is supported by the majority of the public, it's because people feel it's necessary, not because they're stupid and full of fear.

Posted

It's not really that difficult, pretty self explanatory actually.

I certainly do not believe that a sound election strategy is to strip Canadians of their rights and freedoms, and I think Harper is smart enough to understand that this would not be an efficient platform on which to base an election.

If that were Harper's intent, what makes you think he'd be any more upfront about it than he's been with, well, anything else?

I also have a little more faith in the voting public than you and believe that if this is supported by the majority of the public, it's because people feel it's necessary, not because they're stupid and full of fear.

No, people are stupid. How many would actually bother to read the legislation, let alone any informed commentary around it?

Posted

Sorry you think it is pompous to point out what is wrong with this bill.

As I said - it's pompous when you "make your point" by ridiculing that majority of Canadians who disagree with your opinion as Tin Hats.

Back to Basics

Posted

It's not really that difficult, pretty self explanatory actually.

I certainly do not believe that a sound election strategy is to strip Canadians of their rights and freedoms, and I think Harper is smart enough to understand that this would not be an efficient platform on which to base an election. I also have a little more faith in the voting public than you and believe that if this is supported by the majority of the public, it's because people feel it's necessary, not because they're stupid and full of fear.

Obviously you have bought into what Harper is selling here, that certainly isnt difficult. People have been led down the garden path en masse before. I suggest a lot of people buy it without really studying it, or by listening to many legal pros who have raised any a red flag over this bill.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,910
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...