Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know -1 made it personal, socialist.

Try not stooping to that level though.

It may be true that some don't understand "21st century education".

Educating them may be more helpful than insulting them for lack of knowledge.

In informing, updating and changing belief systems, it is always more productive to address the majority who can change, and not beat your head against the wall of the few who can't. They will always try to distract/derail you, and in tangling with them, you may lose the rest who may be more open to your information.

I appreciate your passion and the topics you bring to the board, and I think you are a welcome addition here.

.

I am a great addition to this forum. I bring expertise in the field of public education to this forum.

Anyways, I went back to the article that I posted in the opening of this thread. There are numerous comments since I read the article the first time. A majority of those comments scare me, because they are coming from adults.

It amazes me how little the general public knows about 21st Century learning. It absolutely frightens me how some people are so stuck in the past.

Thankful to have become a free thinker.

Posted

I am a great addition to this forum. I bring expertise in the field of public education to this forum.

Anyways, I went back to the article that I posted in the opening of this thread. There are numerous comments since I read the article the first time. A majority of those comments scare me, because they are coming from adults.

It amazes me how little the general public knows about 21st Century learning. It absolutely frightens me how some people are so stuck in the past.

Well then educate us.

.

Posted

I am a great addition to this forum. I bring expertise in the field of public education to this forum.

Anyways, I went back to the article that I posted in the opening of this thread. There are numerous comments since I read the article the first time. A majority of those comments scare me, because they are coming from adults.

It amazes me how little the general public knows about 21st Century learning. It absolutely frightens me how some people are so stuck in the past.

Have you finished patting yourself on the back yet? Anyway, I know it's bad form to do this, and of course my personal abilities, education, vocation etc, I cannot prove, but since you seem to be willing to judge others so harshly i will only say that in my opinion you might be the least knowledgeable person posting on this forum, on any subject.. Either that or you are just trolling. You come across as almost a caricature of the person you claim to be, in other words, not real, so if that is your goal, well done.

Posted

Well then educate us.

.

I wasn't referring to you. For the most part, you seem to have a solid understanding of 21st Century learning.

Thankful to have become a free thinker.

Posted

I wasn't referring to you. For the most part, you seem to have a solid understanding of 21st Century learning.

I will give you credit for starting conversations.

I do not believe you are a teacher, cannot prove it of course and you have very little knowledge on how to argue a point and for that the proof is in your past postings.

I do agree there are much more important skills that can be taught than handwriting. It is a huge waste of time and effort.

“Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains.”
Winston S. Churchill

There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. –Robert Heinlein

Posted

Well, the article says it "plays an important role in their reading development", and "creates memory traces in the brain that assist with the recognition of letter shapes".

Seems like it's doing the kids a disservice to not allow them to learn it.

Posted

Well, the article says it "plays an important role in their reading development", and "creates memory traces in the brain that assist with the recognition of letter shapes".

Seems like it's doing the kids a disservice to not allow them to learn it.

The article refers to printing letters by hand. The mechanical movements certainly do benefit reading and learning in general. However, this is not a defense of cursive handwriting. I don't think anyone is advocating that we stop teaching kids to print, just that cursive writing has now become a waste of time.

"Our lives begin to end the day we stay silent about the things that matter." - Martin Luther King Jr
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...