Michael Hardner Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 I believe that I can summarize our differences in opinion; You believe in national security and the ability of the our government to objectively use national security as the reason to not disclose certain information. True. I believe in national security but do not trust individuals in our government to use that objectively. You haven't said whether I "trust" the government as well. I don't. I believe that the individuals in our government withhold a whole lot of information from the public that has nothing to do with national security and a whole lot to do with covering incompetence, mistakes and allowing for political spin. Me too. I think I understand and do respect your position and your right to hold it. And the release of video of the attack is unnecessary in my opinion because there's no value in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 That's not a conspiracy. That's just wondering whose shot wound up being the fatal shot. I never mentioned the word conspiracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Well he did not run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpankyMcFarland Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 Mr. Vickers was brave but there are some operational and administrative questions for him to answer. This could be awkward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.