How many would actually oppose this immigration restriction?

[-1=e^ipi]

zactly! You could have... should have... stopped right there and acknowledged your selectively targeted anti-immigration question/OP is failed.

^ Grammar fail.

the theory of evolution does not allow you to carve out selectively targeted anti-immigration "story-telling narratives/beliefs" - the theory is the theory.

Of course not. Where did I make such a claim?

[-1=e^ipi]

It's discriminatory because any old citizen can tell the Queen to go fill-in-blank-here and not a thing will happen to them whereas the new citizen will be turfed.

Thank you for your honesty. At least you are being consistent here, unlike other posters.

[eyeball]

I definitely think we should be screening for and weeding out sycophancy.

[waldo]

^ Grammar fail.

do tell - splain it to me, hey!

Of course not. Where did I make such a claim?

see your story-telling nonsense attempting to create fallicious subsets within evolutionary theory

[-1=e^ipi]

see your story-telling nonsense attempting to create fallicious subsets within evolutionary theory

What 'story-telling nonsense' am I performing and what 'fallicious subsets' am I creating? Back up your claims with evidence please.

[waldo]

What 'story-telling nonsense' am I performing and what 'fallicious subsets' am I creating? Back up your claims with evidence please.

which derivative umbrella are you speaking under?

[-1=e^ipi]

which derivative umbrella are you speaking under?

I'm asking you to back up your claims with evidence. How is that not clear?

[waldo]

I'm asking you to back up your claims with evidence. How is that not clear?

your "young Earth creationist" subset "story-telling" is a real howler! Again, the theory is the theory... if you believe in the theory of evolution... you believe in the theory of evolution.

[Mighty AC]

1. Something has to discriminate against a 'class' of people to be discriminatory now?

2. Could you define these classes of people for me? I know Trudeau tried to define the 'middle class' as 'anyone not living off of their savings'.

Uh...ok. I don't know about P.E.T's middle class definition but I can see why pledging allegiance to a monarch when natural born citizens don't have to is discriminatory.

Additionally, is radical Islam and religiosity in general a problem? Yes....but I don't think your evolution question is a viable solution.

[-1=e^ipi]

Again, the theory is the theory... if you believe in the theory of evolution... you believe in the theory of evolution.

Yes, you understand the concept of a tautology. Congrats. What is your point?

[-1=e^ipi]

Anyway, just to clarify, I don't really advocate the implementation of such an immigration restriction. I was more interested in how many people would be strongly opposed to it and what kind of reasons they would give. Would people claim that such a restriction is immoral because it goes against 'human rights' or would people claim that such a policy shouldn't be implemented because it would be ineffective? Would people have a position that is consistent with their position on the current requirement of immigrants needing to pledge alliegence to the Queen in order to obtain citizenship?