Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To-day, the UN released a scathing report on the way the Harper government has been treating aboriginals. United Nations envoy says there’s a crisis in Canada when it comes to how aboriginal people in this country are treated, noting that the relationship between the federal government and indigenous peoples is even more strained than a decade ago.

Is this report accurate?

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Is this report accurate?

If it was published by the UN is a pile of nonsense. These so called "UN reports" are really nothing but position papers for people making money from the perpetual native grievance machine. Edited by TimG
Posted

I think the Harper Government, given a choice, would treat aboriginals the same as every other Canadian. You can see that in the changes that Harper has tried to make.

Posted

If it was published by the UN is a pile of nonsense. These so called "UN reports" are really nothing but position papers for people making money from the perpetual native grievance machine.

Challenges to the UN are extremist by their very definition. The US doesn't challenge the UN when it finds it's useful to their cause. Canada is starting to do the same.

Posted

The UN is a convenient whipping boy for folks that don't know any better. I have worked for them as a contractor in a number of locations, mostly war zones, and saw a lot of good being done in some places, and not so good in others. I guess some people expect them to be perfectr.

Posted

and saw a lot of good being done in some places, and not so good in others. I guess some people expect them to be perfectr.

The UN is a big organization. Criticizing a report written by political activists on the treatment of minorities in a democratic country with a strong commitment to the rule of law does imply that everything the UN does is bad. As a general rule, if they are involved on the ground in countries without functioning governments then they are doing good. If they are lecturing democracies about how they should manage political discussions then they are full of crap.
Posted

The UN is a big organization. Criticizing a report written by political activists on the treatment of minorities in a democratic country with a strong commitment to the rule of law does imply that everything the UN does is bad. As a general rule, if they are involved on the ground in countries without functioning governments then they are doing good. If they are lecturing democracies about how they should manage political discussions then they are full of crap.

That's a pretty big stretch. It implies nothing of the kind.

Posted

That's a pretty big stretch. It implies nothing of the kind.

It does when you think about it in terms of the real evils going on in the world, in comparison to the things looked at in this report.

Posted

It does when you think about it in terms of the real evils going on in the world, in comparison to the things looked at in this report.

You could make a case that there may be more pressing issues the UN could make reports on. That has nothing to do with the validity of the current report.

Posted

You could make a case that there may be more pressing issues the UN could make reports on. That has nothing to do with the validity of the current report.

Who at the UN is qualified to judge.

Posted (edited)

That has nothing to do with the validity of the current report.

In democratic countries with the rule of law the are processes for resolving political disputes. The UN has no business trying to pre-empt these processes by taking sides. The report on aboriginals is no different than the UN releasing a report saying people should vote for a particular party. Edited by TimG
Posted

The UN is a convenient whipping boy

They are. Even more convenient when they give Iran a seat on the Women's Rights Commission, don't you think?

Posted

In democratic countries with the rule of law the are processes for resolving political disputes. The UN has no business trying to pre-empt these processes by taking sides. The report on aboriginals is no different than the UN releasing a report saying people should vote for a particular party.

Yes, in the US especially there are rules that politicians make up to validate a planned war. The UN's mission is to prevent wars and so it's seen as interfering sometimes.

Imagine that, not being gung-ho for a war! That's when the criticism starts.

Posted (edited)

Yes, in the US especially there are rules that politicians make up to validate a planned war. The UN's mission is to prevent wars and so it's seen as interfering sometimes.

Yeah...that's how Canada especially bombed Serbia without UN interference. Warmongers !

Canada has been ignoring UN reports on "aboriginals" for decades, just like any other sovereign nation.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

In democratic countries with the rule of law the are processes for resolving political disputes. The UN has no business trying to pre-empt these processes by taking sides. The report on aboriginals is no different than the UN releasing a report saying people should vote for a particular party.

It's not a political dispute, it's a scorecard. The UN isn't looking for votes.

Posted

An American calling a Canadian a warmonger? Give me a break.

No...it's about ignoring the UN...in peace or war. Like this report....PM Harper is certainly not the first to ignore such things in Canada.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Yeah...that's how Canada especially bombed Serbia without UN interference. Warmongers !

Canada has been ignoring UN reports on "aboriginals" for decades, just like any other sovereign nation.

Look bush_cheney, I'm not an American and I don't foolishly support my country when it does wrong. It's called honesty just in case you might want to try it with me. And so yes, Canada signed on to the phony war in Kosovo and Serbia and Canadian heads should roll at the Hague for that.

Not to mention that we bear a lot of guilt over our treatment of our aboriginals.

So I guess we're in agreement once again right? On the Kosovo war both the US and Canada and other Nato countries are guilty of waging a phony war and are guilty of murdering Serbs under their bombs.

Or would you like to spin 180 on that now?

Posted (edited)

It's not a political dispute, it's a scorecard. The UN isn't looking for votes.

The "scorecard" is nothing but a set of talking points written by political activists for the native grievance industry. It is no different than a "scorecard" that rated the Canadian government by using talking points from the NDP policy book. They may not be looking for votes but they are definitely picking sides a domestic political debate. Edited by TimG
Posted

The "scorecard" is nothing but a set of talking points written by political activists for the native grievance industry. It is no different than a "scorecard" that rated the Canadian government by using talking points from the NDP policy book. They may not be looking for votes but they are definitely picking sides a political debate.

Daft.

Posted

Not to mention that we bear a lot of guilt over our treatment of our aboriginals.

So what ? It's not something that suddenly occurred on PM Harper's watch. Does this "guilt" come and go with the political seasons ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

With UN approval we went to war. Without it we did not.

Nope....like other sovereign states, Canada ignores the UN when it wishes for policy interests, and that includes "wars". Aboriginals have even less of a chance domestically. Land claims ......what land claims ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

Daft.

Only because you happen to support the side of the political debate that the UN activists choose to support. You would be just as critical of the UN if they picked a side that you disagreed with. You really have to stop assuming that people saying things that affirm your political prejudices are unbiased just because your prejudices are being affirmed. Edited by TimG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...