Michael Hardner Posted September 11, 2013 Report Posted September 11, 2013 Or, perhaps more pointedly: Ontario, why don't you care about eHealth except when there's a potboiling scandal up ? https://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=ehealth+ontario&oq=ehealth+ontario&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.1745.3638.0.3860.15.2.0.13.0.0.119.205.1j1.2.0...0.0...1ac.1.nSChaES_InU#authuser=0&gl=ca&hl=en&q=ehealth+ontario+-scandals&tbm=nws Google News search (taking out the search word 'scandals') shows there's no news. I guess we're just continuing to spend Billions (?) on ... something. Meanwhile, Canada's Health Services performance information service (CIHI - Canadian Institute for Health Information, heard of them ?) takes a poll about online health records: http://www.cihi.ca/land Only 6% (6% !!!) are either 'on the fence' or 'don't see their value'. So why aren't we doing this ? Comparing our health system to the US constantly helps our vanity and pride, but doesn't improve the system. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
jacee Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 Hmm ... All my records in Ontario are accessible by dr and hospitals. I don't have to answer all the same intake questions anymore. Isn't that ehealth in operation? Is it only in operation in some places? Quote
Michael Hardner Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Posted September 12, 2013 Really ? There hasn't been any announcement. I don't think that all records are accessible, actually. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
jacee Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 (edited) http://www.ehealthontario.on.ca/en/progress-report Today, 2 out of 3 Ontarians have an electronic medical record (EMR). Maybe not where you are, but I've certainly noticed the difference in the last two years. Records and reports are transferred immediately - eg, My dr knows all the details of visits to emerg without me telling him ( and possibly forgetting something). Hospitals know drug sensitivities without relying on traumatized or unconscious victims. You don't have to sit through lengthy intake interviews (and possibly forget something) about your medical history every time you go to hosp - they have it online. I think it's a great system. What I noticed, in repeated emergency visits with a friend, is that treatment of chronic conditions is more effective now, doesn't start from scratch every time like before but carries on to the next step immediately as they have the history. I guess some people are still missing out. Edited September 12, 2013 by jacee Quote
Boges Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 My Doctor uses a puter for all my records now. But does that mean all my previous files from previous doctor's offices I've visited are all digitized? I highly doubt it. Quote
jacee Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 My Doctor uses a puter for all my records now. But does that mean all my previous files from previous doctor's offices I've visited are all digitized? I highly doubt it. No, I doubt they're digitizing past records, though if you request past records be sent to your dr they may - it'll be a summary.The links between labs, hospitals and drs though are great. Improves efficiency and effectiveness a lot, imo. Quote
Boges Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 No, I doubt they're digitizing past records, though if you request past records be sent to your dr they may - it'll be a summary. The links between labs, hospitals and drs though are great. Improves efficiency and effectiveness a lot, imo. Yet when I wanted a copy of my MRI they couldn't just e-mail a file to my GP, I had to drive to the hospital and pick up a CD. Quote
jacee Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 (edited) Yet when I wanted a copy of my MRI they couldn't just e-mail a file to my GP, I had to drive to the hospital and pick up a CD. That wouldn't happen here now. I don't even have to carry a prescription to the pharmacy any more. Edited September 12, 2013 by jacee Quote
Michael Hardner Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Posted September 12, 2013 They're doing a terrible job of communicating whatever is going on: http://www.ehealthontario.on.ca/en/news Nothing since last year ? Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Boges Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 This Liberal government doing anything that's not a terrible job would be shocking. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Posted September 12, 2013 This issue transcends politics, though. The agency was, I believe, started by the Harris government and maintained through 4 premiers now. There doesn't seem to be an arena for debate over these monolithic entities - they only seem to make it to the front page when there's a scandal brought up in Question Period. My questions: - What are they doing ? Where is the roadmap / timeline ? - What are the costs and benefits ? Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Boges Posted September 12, 2013 Report Posted September 12, 2013 This issue transcends politics, though. The agency was, I believe, started by the Harris government and maintained through 4 premiers now. There doesn't seem to be an arena for debate over these monolithic entities - they only seem to make it to the front page when there's a scandal brought up in Question Period. My questions: - What are they doing ? Where is the roadmap / timeline ? - What are the costs and benefits ? We see the same with Metrolinx right now. Arm's length government agencies are just money pits. They seem to be accountable to no one. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Posted September 12, 2013 Actually, the opposite issue has been said of Metrolinx after the Premier imposed a change on their long term plan. It's a tough thing to manage - either accountable and politicized, or independent... Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Bryan Posted September 13, 2013 Report Posted September 13, 2013 Yet when I wanted a copy of my MRI they couldn't just e-mail a file to my GP, I had to drive to the hospital and pick up a CD. At least you get to have that CD. I got my last MRI here in Manitoba very quickly (total wait = 6 days), but neither me nor my doctor were allowed to actually SEE it. All we are allowed to see is the radiologist's written report. When my local surgeon said he couldn't help me, I wanted a copy of the MRI so that I could get another opinion elsewhere, and I ended up having to go to the states to pay for another one in order to do that. Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 So why aren't we doing this ? Comparing our health system to the US constantly helps our vanity and pride, but doesn't improve the system. I agree, a waste of time, and not about much more than self-image. So ok...if a serious and clear proposal is floated to turn us into a US-styled system...then the comparisons are valid and crucial. But for the moment, they serve no good purpose. The US will continue to struggle its way through, potentially to a better system than their current one. And that's what Canadians should be doing, as well. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.