waldo Posted March 26, 2013 Report Posted March 26, 2013 Sadly, one of the contributing factors to the shortage of donor tissues and organs is Canada's low donor rate: thankfully... we can just sit back and watch you implode... even more! You've been bit, once again, by one of those contributors you so wanted to over-emphasize and offer as a/the principal rationalization in discussing the "American Health Disadvantage" - i.e., life-style, risk aversion, reckless choices, etc.,... as you emphasized, American "freedom". you choose to limit your narrow short-sighted net-prowls to your easy cut&paste exercises - given the number of times you've been bit, one would think you might actually invest a few cycles in analysis before throwing down your next "ta da"! what your linked article doesn't bother to differentiate is how organ/tissue rates are calculated in the U.S./Spain versus Canada. Canada's figures only include completed transplants - actual donated tissue/organs transplanted. U.S./Spain rates include non-transplant numbers. When considering actual donor transplants, those transplant procedures completed, the ratio for Canada is 3.2 organs transplanted per donor... for the U.S., 3.0 per donor... and for Spain, 2.6 per donor. your linked article also fails to differentiate a most significant factor - that of presumed consent! Spain has a presumed consent practice/law... organs/tissues will always be donated unless a contributor/source has formally "opted out". In the U.S., only 20 states have signed on to the latest 2007 iteration of the U.S. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA)... in Canada, a donor/family members speaking on behalf of the donor must formally give consent. your biggest fail is relying on a cut&paste that doesn't factor your (claimed) country's freedom... expressed in increased U.S. mortality figures! When considering the main causes associated with cadaver donations, Canada has a relatively low mortality rate relative to Spain and the United States: for example, Canada's age standardized per year road death rate is 101 road deaths/million population... Spain's rate is 142 road deaths/million... the U.S. rate is 156 road deaths/million. Equally, Canada's age standardized per year mortality rate due to gunshot wounds is 35 gunshot deaths/million population... the U.S. rate is 126 gunshot deaths/million population. Apparently, not having as many cadavers available just might be a contributor to donor rates - go figure!!! how does your "sadly" summation fit in your Canadian to U.S./Spain comparisons... when you don't bother to recognize key differentiation factors... like actual donors-to-actual transplants, like consent, like mortality rates, hey? Of course, non of this addresses considerations of country differences in demographics, socio-economic factors, etc. Clearly, it's much easier for a cut&paste connoisseur. like you, to ignore all that in dropping your latest "sadly" summation, right? but it gets even better... rather worse... for your lame-assed cut&paste effort: "sadly"... per the latest figures from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in the United States, 117,546 people are currently waiting for an organ... "sadly", 18 people will die in the U.S. each day waiting for an organ. "sadly"... a trend is showing through here relative to the significantly increasing U.S. wait list versus number of donors: keep trying, lil' buddy... keep trying! . Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 26, 2013 Author Report Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) Sadly, the organ donation rate in Canada is flat or declining...not improving despite outreach programs. This translates into more deaths and higher health care costs: The deceased donor rate decreased to 13.6 donors per million population in 2010 compared with 14.0 in 2006. The majority of people waiting for a transplant need a kidney. Amongthis group, the average time spent on dialysis was 3.7 years. Patientswith an available living donor were on dialysis for just under 1.5years. The wait time has "substantial cost implications," CIHI said. Theinstitute estimated it costs about $60,000 for hemodialysis per patientper year compared with $23,000 for a kidney transplant plus $6,000 ayear for medications. "Over a five-year period, a transplant is therefore approximately$250,000 cheaper per patient than dialysis while improving quality oflife." http://ca.news.yahoo.com/organ-donation-rates-flat-164829698.html We do get an unexpected clue as to why fewer Canadians are organ/tissue donors: some Canadians think that their universal system has less incentive to keep them alive and might be too enthusiastic to harvest organs (despite the logical error in such thinking). "Some people worry," she said. "They wonder, if I have an organ donorcard, will every effort be made to save my life, or if they want me asan organ donor. People fear that." http://www.gfwadvertiser.ca/News/2012-03-18/article-2929364/Canadian-organ-donation-rates-not-high/1 Edited March 26, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 26, 2013 Report Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) Sadly, the organ donation rate in Canada is flat or declining...not improving despite outreach programs. This translates into more deaths and higher health care costs: more of your cut&paste gems... while you close your eyes, plug your ears and shout 'la la la la la la'!!! "sadly"... per the latest figures from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in the United States, 117,546 people are currently waiting for an organ... "sadly", 18 people will die in the U.S. each day waiting for an organ. "sadly"... a trend is showing through here relative to the significantly increasing U.S. wait list versus number of donors: . Edited March 26, 2013 by waldo Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 26, 2013 Author Report Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) The sadness continues for Global Nephrology.....why are Canada's provinces so poorly organized for such vital health care services ? What is really going on here (err...there) ??? “Canada — unlike the United States and mostEuropean countries — has no centralized, national list for people desperate fora new organ, in effect putting geography ahead of need. And that long wait can be deadly. Inthe first half of 2011, 20 of the 36 Canadians who died while waiting for atransplanted kidney were from Ontario — more than all the other provincescombined. In 2010, another 80 Canadians passed away, 34 of them from Ontario.” Sher points out that Canada also has the lowest organ donorrate in the Western world at 15 donors per million inhabitants, half the ratein the U.S. and many European countries. This is true although Australia comesin at bottom at 11 donors per million inhabitants according to statistics fromthe International Registry of Organ Donation and Transplantation http://www.thekidneydoctor.org/2012/02/global-nephrology-system-of-organ.html- Edited March 26, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 26, 2013 Report Posted March 26, 2013 The sadness continues yes - your sadness continues. Apparently, your sadness doesn't extend to a concern over the 18 Americans dying each day while waiting on American donor wait lists. Your sadness continues in avoiding acknowledging your sorry assed charade was exposed, once again. You can continue to try to ignore my earlier reply. I'll just keep quoting from it - re-quoting it. Have another extract: "sadly"... per the latest figures from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in the United States, 117,546 people are currently waiting for an organ... "sadly", 18 people will die in the U.S. each day waiting for an organ. "sadly"... a trend is showing through here relative to the significantly increasing U.S. wait list versus number of donors: . Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 26, 2013 Author Report Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) The broader donation picture for blood, grafts, and other tissues in Canada remains sad....how long can the U.S. system provide such imports when its own needs are growing ?? Why don't more Canadians donate ?????? Canada's organ donation system is failing patients, and the solutionsinclude having registries in each province and depending less on theUnited States for tissue, a new report says. ...Of particular concern is tissue donation - transplants of corneas andheart valves, grafts of bone and skin - said the report, obtained by TheGlobe and Mail, noting "Canada imports approximately 80 per cent of itstissue product - a dependency that could pose risks to Canadianpatients." ..."Tissue production in Canada is limited by the number of donors, thecapacity to recover tissue and the focus on meeting only local needs,"the report said. "As a result, end-users across Canada cannotconsistently rely on their tissue banks to have the type, quantity andquality of tissue product they need." Edited March 26, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 26, 2013 Report Posted March 26, 2013 hey... I can go all day! You can continue to ignore the following post... I'll simply replay it over and over again! Don't you care about the 18 Americans dying every day on your (claimed) country's organ waiting list? Don't you care about the ever-increasing organ wait list trend? Don't you care about the ~118,000 Americans currently waiting... as you say, why would Americans have to wait? As you say, why don't Americans donate... more? Sadly, one of the contributing factors to the shortage of donor tissues and organs is Canada's low donor rate:thankfully... we can just sit back and watch you implode... even more! You've been bit, once again, by one of those contributors you so wanted to over-emphasize and offer as a/the principal rationalization in discussing the "American Health Disadvantage" - i.e., life-style, risk aversion, reckless choices, etc.,... as you emphasized, American "freedom".you choose to limit your narrow short-sighted net-prowls to your easy cut&paste exercises - given the number of times you've been bit, one would think you might actually invest a few cycles in analysis before throwing down your next "ta da"!what your linked article doesn't bother to differentiate is how organ/tissue rates are calculated in the U.S./Spain versus Canada. Canada's figures only include completed transplants - actual donated tissue/organs transplanted. U.S./Spain rates include non-transplant numbers. When considering actual donor transplants, those transplant procedures completed, the ratio for Canada is 3.2 organs transplanted per donor... for the U.S., 3.0 per donor... and for Spain, 2.6 per donor.your linked article also fails to differentiate a most significant factor - that of presumed consent! Spain has a presumed consent practice/law... organs/tissues will always be donated unless a contributor/source has formally "opted out". In the U.S., only 20 states have signed on to the latest 2007 iteration of the U.S. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA)... in Canada, a donor/family members speaking on behalf of the donor must formally give consent.your biggest fail is relying on a cut&paste that doesn't factor your (claimed) country's freedom... expressed in increased U.S. mortality figures! When considering the main causes associated with cadaver donations, Canada has a relatively low mortality rate relative to Spain and the United States: for example, Canada's age standardized per year road death rate is 101 road deaths/million population... Spain's rate is 142 road deaths/million... the U.S. rate is 156 road deaths/million. Equally, Canada's age standardized per year mortality rate due to gunshot wounds is 35 gunshot deaths/million population... the U.S. rate is 126 gunshot deaths/million population. Apparently, not having as many cadavers available just might be a contributor to donor rates - go figure!!!how does your "sadly" summation fit in your Canadian to U.S./Spain comparisons... when you don't bother to recognize key differentiation factors... like actual donors-to-actual transplants, like consent, like mortality rates, hey? Of course, non of this addresses considerations of country differences in demographics, socio-economic factors, etc. Clearly, it's much easier for a cut&paste connoisseur. like you, to ignore all that in dropping your latest "sadly" summation, right? but it gets even better... rather worse... for your lame-assed cut&paste effort: "sadly"... per the latest figures from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in the United States, 117,546 people are currently waiting for an organ... "sadly", 18 people will die in the U.S. each day waiting for an organ."sadly"... a trend is showing through here relative to the significantly increasing U.S. wait list versus number of donors:keep trying, lil' buddy... keep trying!.. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 26, 2013 Author Report Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) Now it just gets weird, but desperate times call for desperate measures. We know about swine parts, but you better guard your dog and cat too: Canada considers harvesting animal tissue for human transplant. Issue #1: Is xenotransplantation needed? Xenotransplantation is the transfer of living cells, tissues or organsfrom one animal species to another for medical purposes. We use the termhere to refer to animal-to-human transplants. The transplanted materialis called a xenotransplant. The need for organs in Canada is expected to increase by almost 200 percent by 2020. http://www.cpha.ca/en/activities/xeno/background.aspx Edited March 26, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 27, 2013 Report Posted March 27, 2013 Now it just gets weird, but desperate times call for desperate measures. We know about swine parts, but you better guard your dog and cat too: I guess when it reaches the formal level of U.S. FDA guidelines one might assume you'd show a more reserved position relative to your (claimed) countries related practices... guidelines all the way back to 1999, 2000, 2001... Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Posted March 27, 2013 Quebec rightfully toots its own horn relative to corneal transplant performance and efforts to fix the broken "system": Quebec cornea transplant system most efficient in country...A CBC investigation into corneal transplant wait times and eyebanking across the country has revealed the system is largely adysfunctional patchwork of services, despite the existence of analready-developed Canadian Blood Services plan that, experts say, couldeliminate corneal blindness in six months. “It is sad. It is sad for the patients who are not living well whocould be living much better if they were able to see and be morecomfortable. It is sad because it's a process that actually can beundertaken anywhere else in the rest of the provinces just likeHéma-Québec did for Quebec,” said Dr. Mona Dagher, an ophthalmologistwith the University of Montreal hospital centre (CHUM). http://canada.onlinenigeria.com/montreal/60744-quebec-cornea-transplant-system-most-efficient-in-country.html Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 27, 2013 Report Posted March 27, 2013 good to see you're still failing by playing off false-equivalencies while continuing to ignore the waitlist and deaths per day (on that waitlist) of your (claimed) country's organ/tissue donor-transplant system.further to an extract of my earlier reply - the one you steadfastly refuse to even acknowledge: what your linked article doesn't bother to differentiate is how organ/tissue rates are calculated in the U.S./Spain versus Canada. Canada's figures only include completed transplants - actual donated tissue/organs transplanted. U.S./Spain rates include non-transplant numbers. When considering actual donor transplants, those transplant procedures completed, the ratio for Canada is 3.2 organs transplanted per donor... for the U.S., 3.0 per donor... and for Spain, 2.6 per donor. of course, the rate calculation difference is amplified when recognizing the percentage of U.S. donor organs discarded per the following graphic... again, Canada's rate calculation presumes upon completed transplant procedures! A key acknowledgement and related directive from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services speaks to the inherent inefficiencies within the U.S. donor transplant system... that within the U.S. many organs that are recovered for transplant are not used - that relief from the U.S. organ shortage may be possible by focusing efforts on minimizing the number of discarded organs recovered for transplant: . Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Posted March 27, 2013 (edited) Canada imports about 80% of tissues and organs, mostly from the U.S.A., which has a much better organized and financed system of registration, harvesting, and transportation. Without American sources, Canada's blood banks, transplants, grafting, and other tissue related services would collapse. A true case of blood for oil ! Canadian Blood Services has recognized the obvious gaps and seeks to make changes: Canadian Blood Services urges revamp of organ donor system Canada's organ donation system is failing patients, and the solutionsinclude having registries in each province and depending less on theUnited States for tissue, a new report says. ...The number of patients requiring organs is climbing. Last year, 4,529Canadians, including 1,515 in Ontario, were waiting for transplants,according to the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. A total of 2,153organs were transplanted and 247 people died waiting. Many on the waiting lists require kidneys - about 3,300 last year - areality that Steve Dembicky, 54, of Mississauga, Ont., knows all toowell. He has been on dialysis for the past four years, which is sotiring that he often has to rest for an afternoon to rebuild his energy. "The thing I miss is being able to go away," said Mr. Dembicky, whohas to restrict his diet and the amount of fluids he can drink. "Myentire life is built around my medical treatment." He has been told the average wait time for a kidney match with his blood type is five to seven years. The waits are also lengthy for those awaiting tissue transplants, 80per cent of which are obtained through the United States. The reportsaid this dependency could put Canadian patients at risk if demandexceeds supply. "Tissue production in Canada is limited by the number of donors, thecapacity to recover tissue and the focus on meeting only local needs,"the report said. "As a result, end-users across Canada cannotconsistently rely on their tissue banks to have the type, quantity andquality of tissue product they need." Edited March 27, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 27, 2013 Report Posted March 27, 2013 Canada imports about 80% of tissues and organs, mostly from the U.S.A., which has a much better organized and financed system of registration, harvesting, and transportation. Without American sources, Canada's blood banks, transplants, grafting, and other tissue related services would collapse. A true case of blood for oil ! ... and you didn't supply your link because the actual article you're referencing pre-dates your OP "concern" and speaks to the 80% in terms of "tissues" - so, of course, you take your standard liberty and extend that to include "organs". The rest is just your bellicose! As for your emphasized concern for ~4500 Canadians on a years long wait list... for ~250 Canadians who died while waiting on that years long wait list, apparently, as stated now several times, your trumped up concern doesn't extend to your (claimed) country: per updated daily adjustments, ~118,000 Americans are currently on the existing to-date American wait list... ~18 Americans are dying each day while on that existing to-date American wait list: I've already addressed the shortage of organs/tissues for transplant in the U.S.... in the immediate preceding post (that you're also ignoring) I spoke to a significant inefficiency within your (claimed) country's system - a mismatch between a shortage of organs and those being discarded without being used. as I said, you can keep ignoring my posts... you can keep showcasing your petty, trolling efforts - I'm more than content to simply reply the posts you refuse to acknowledge. The sadness continuesyes - your sadness continues. Apparently, your sadness doesn't extend to a concern over the 18 Americans dying each day while waiting on American donor wait lists. Your sadness continues in avoiding acknowledging your sorry assed charade was exposed, once again. You can continue to try to ignore my earlier reply. I'll just keep quoting from it - re-quoting it. Have another extract: "sadly"... per the latest figures from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in the United States, 117,546 people are currently waiting for an organ... "sadly", 18 people will die in the U.S. each day waiting for an organ. "sadly"... a trend is showing through here relative to the significantly increasing U.S. wait list versus number of donors: . Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Posted March 27, 2013 (edited) A relatively recent (2010) Ipsos Reid poll provides some insight into why tissue and organ donation is in its present (dismal) state (Canada). Interestingly, the lack of a nationwide (perhaps this concept is foreign to Canadians) program of organ and tissue donation may work against transplant objectives because the majority feel that all Canadians should have equal access to donated organs and tissues. This would make the creation of such a national resource more important. http://www.bloodservices.ca/CentreApps/Internet/UW_V502_MainEngine.nsf/resources/Releases/$file/IPSOS+Report.pdf The export of organs and tissues from the U.S. to Canada is only possible because of a successful nationwide system of registration and harvesting upon donor death. Provincial barriers and existing foreign supply may be inhibiting the formation of a more successful donor program, one that could satisfy Canada's needs. Edited March 27, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 27, 2013 Report Posted March 27, 2013 The export of organs and tissues from the U.S. to Canada is only possible because of a successful nationwide system of registration and harvesting upon donor death. Provincial barriers and existing foreign supply may be inhibiting the formation of a more successful donor program, one that could satisfy Canada's needs. no - in your ongoing effort to deny reality, the U.S. system is not your touted model of success and efficiency. It's most admirable processing intent aside, the U.S. system is not meeting demand and hasn't historically. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has had to bring forward multiple ongoing initiatives, year over year, to attempt to bridge the gap between donors and required transplant recipients... attempting to better the processing and working relationships between U.S. State level Organ Donor Registration Networks and local organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Again - not meeting demand... ~118,000 Americans currently on a wait list... ~18 Americans dying daily while waiting . Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 28, 2013 Author Report Posted March 28, 2013 Canada "system" is stuck in neutral when it comes to corneal transplants. The idea of "waiting lists" has become a permanent fixture in provinces even for the most common transplant surgery in North America and Europe: CBC Radio: Cornea shortage - Part 2...we told you about the waiting list for corneas in Alberta and how oneEdmonton eye doctor wants the province to get them from the UnitedStates. Eye banks south of the border have a surplus of the tissue.There's a shortage here in Canada. http://www.cbc.ca/player/Radio/Local+Shows/Alberta/ID/2254768908/?page=28&sort=MostRecent Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Bonam Posted March 28, 2013 Report Posted March 28, 2013 It seems kind of obvious as society gets safer and life expectancy gets longer, that there will be a shortage of organs in general. From my understanding, organs generally need to be harvested from people that die not at a very old age while their organs are still healthy, that is, car accident victims, shooting victims, etc. And the people that need organs are generally people who have aged and whose organs are failing. More and more people are living longer and longer and needing more and more medical procedures late in life, while fewer and fewer people are dying from violence and accidents while their organs are young and healthy and ready for transplant. As these trends continue, wait lists will invariably develop and grow, regardless of the methods of financing and organizing organ transplant systems. As always, the only real solution is technological progress, the ability to create/grow the needed organ replacements artificially, rather than getting them from a human donor. Fortunately, this is rapidly becoming possible with more and more kinds of transplants. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 28, 2013 Author Report Posted March 28, 2013 .....As always, the only real solution is technological progress, the ability to create/grow the needed organ replacements artificially, rather than getting them from a human donor. Fortunately, this is rapidly becoming possible with more and more kinds of transplants. Agreed, as there are several technical advances that will yield more tissues and organs for transplantation, including prolonged storage after harvesting from donors. Pressure is also building to break down objections to compensated donation and presumed consent (opt out) as was done in Spain, propelling that country's donor rates to the top of the list. There is already an existing black market in human organ/tissue products driven by cash payments, so this illegal activity could be better regulated if sanctioned by a legal/ethical framework. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 28, 2013 Report Posted March 28, 2013 It seems kind of obvious as society gets safer and life expectancy gets longer, that there will be a shortage of organs in general. From my understanding, organs generally need to be harvested from people that die not at a very old age while their organs are still healthy, that is, car accident victims, shooting victims, etc. And the people that need organs are generally people who have aged and whose organs are failing. More and more people are living longer and longer and needing more and more medical procedures late in life, while fewer and fewer people are dying from violence and accidents while their organs are young and healthy and ready for transplant. As these trends continue, wait lists will invariably develop and grow, regardless of the methods of financing and organizing organ transplant systems. yes - as I identified earlier, mortality rates are a factor... as I stated, the high U.S. mortality rate naturally brings forward greater numbers of donated organs as compared to Canada... e.g., gun violence, motor-vehicle accidents, risk adverse life-style choices all contribute to a higher U.S. organ donor rate. As for the aging population consideration, a practical transplant age constraint will always hold the need down to a measured point; one subject to cost vs. the degree of life enhancing/sustaining possible. Equally, at some point, need will diminish as the boomers all die off and the lower birth rate takes hold. As always, the only real solution is technological progress, the ability to create/grow the needed organ replacements artificially, rather than getting them from a human donor. Fortunately, this is rapidly becoming possible with more and more kinds of transplants. my recent days googly forays to counter the idiocy of BC_2004 has afforded me some insight into 'regenerative medicine'... I read of examples of successful lab generation and transplants back as far as 2001. The obvious question - why hasn't this progressed further? Well, ethics enters for one as some of the focus was/is on stem cells... equally, the whole 'human cloning' concern gets raised. But, to me, cost seems to be the overriding factor. Even as it stands, the very high U.S. wait list still only accounts for ~7000 American deaths a year for those unable to realize a transplant while waiting on the list... even if you doubled or tripled that rate of deaths per year, it's still a relatively insignificant number of deaths as compared to all manner of other deaths. That insignificant number gets balanced out against diminishing budgets and the regenerative medicine costs (research, testing, trials, implementation, deployment, etc.). as for the suggestion of shifting to an 'opt out' donor policy, how would that ever fly in the U.S.? That country is so tightly wound over anything that hints at any suggestion of removing any degree of personal liberty/control... couple that with probable ties to a government run system administering 'presumed donor consent' and you'll see the U.S. right-wing/Teebaggers implode! Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 28, 2013 Author Report Posted March 28, 2013 ...as for the suggestion of shifting to an 'opt out' donor policy, how would that ever fly in the U.S.? That country is so tightly wound over anything that hints at any suggestion of removing any degree of personal liberty/control... couple that with probable ties to a government run system administering 'presumed donor consent' and you'll see the U.S. right-wing/Teebaggers implode! ...and yet the U.S. has a much higher voluntary donor rate than Canada, to the point of being able to export blood products, tissue, and organs to Canada (80 % imported). Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 28, 2013 Report Posted March 28, 2013 as for the suggestion of shifting to an 'opt out' donor policy, how would that ever fly in the U.S.? That country is so tightly wound over anything that hints at any suggestion of removing any degree of personal liberty/control... couple that with probable ties to a government run system administering 'presumed donor consent' and you'll see the U.S. right-wing/Teebaggers implode! ...and yet the U.S. has a much higher voluntary donor rate than Canada as follows, an extract from my earlier post... speaks to considerations of rate comparisons! what your linked article doesn't bother to differentiate is how organ/tissue rates are calculated in the U.S./Spain versus Canada. Canada's figures only include completed transplants - actual donated tissue/organs transplanted. U.S./Spain rates include non-transplant numbers. When considering actual donor transplants, those transplant procedures completed, the ratio for Canada is 3.2 organs transplanted per donor... for the U.S., 3.0 per donor... and for Spain, 2.6 per donor. your linked article also fails to differentiate a most significant factor - that of presumed consent! Spain has a presumed consent practice/law... organs/tissues will always be donated unless a contributor/source has formally "opted out". In the U.S., only 20 states have signed on to the latest 2007 iteration of the U.S. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA)... in Canada, a donor/family members speaking on behalf of the donor must formally give consent. your biggest fail is relying on a cut&paste that doesn't factor your (claimed) country's freedom... expressed in increased U.S. mortality figures! When considering the main causes associated with cadaver donations, Canada has a relatively low mortality rate relative to Spain and the United States: for example, Canada's age standardized per year road death rate is 101 road deaths/million population... Spain's rate is 142 road deaths/million... the U.S. rate is 156 road deaths/million. Equally, Canada's age standardized per year mortality rate due to gunshot wounds is 35 gunshot deaths/million population... the U.S. rate is 126 gunshot deaths/million population. Apparently, not having as many cadavers available just might be a contributor to donor rates - go figure!!! how does your "sadly" summation fit in your Canadian to U.S./Spain comparisons... when you don't bother to recognize key differentiation factors... like actual donors-to-actual transplants, like consent, like mortality rates, hey? Of course, non of this addresses considerations of country differences in demographics, socio-economic factors, etc. Clearly, it's much easier for a cut&paste connoisseur. like you, to ignore all that in dropping your latest "sadly" summation, right? Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 28, 2013 Author Report Posted March 28, 2013 More of the same twisting and turning when faced with the inescapable: The....United...States...exports....tissue....and....organs....to.....Canada....without....which...provincial....transplant...surgeries...would....collapse. As reported by Canada's state sponsored, financed, and controlled CBC media outlet, the "system" is broken. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 28, 2013 Report Posted March 28, 2013 More of the same twisting and turning when faced with the inescapable: The....United...States...exports....tissue....and....organs....to.....Canada....without....which...provincial....transplant...surgeries...would....collapse. As reported by Canada's state sponsored, financed, and controlled CBC media outlet, the "system" is broken. the only twisting and turning is yours... as you continue to ignore all the facts/figures thrown at you. Your personal insecurity and sensitivity forces you to deny the state of your own (claimed) country's organ donor system. Does Canada import "something" from the U.S. - apparently so, although I can't find anything to suggest, with certainty, the what and how much is being imported. You threw down a quote that said "80% tissues and organs"... and you didn't link to your referenced quote. Of course, I found your Globe&Mail article that spoke to 80% tissue imports (so, of course, you took liberties in extending that to organs)... equally, the Globe article said nothing about where those imports came from... and it didn't source it's own numbers. Why would any of that give pause to a cut&paste connoisseur, like you - hey? Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 29, 2013 Author Report Posted March 29, 2013 (edited) Then forget about the G&M and go to Canada's state sponsored, financed, and controlled media outlet...the CBC, which echoes the same dismal donor system statistics. Reasons we lag behind other countries The reasons that Canada lags behind other countries are many and varied, said Sher. "Why have some Canadians who have consented to be organ and tissuedonors not been provided the opportunity to donate?" he asked. "Becausetheir family wasn't asked? There were not enough intensive-care beds oroperating room time? Or because it wasn't simple enough to confirm theirdonor status? "Why are some people living with blindness today because they can'tget access to a corneal transplant? The lack of co-ordination in eye andtissue banking results in inconsistent approaches to quality ... and aninsufficient supply of tissues with widespread inefficiencies acrossthe health system." Sher said more than 80 per cent of tissues — such as bones, tendons,skin and heart valves — transplanted into Canadians come from the UnitedStates. If implemented, the strategic plan would also aim to improvetissue donations within Canada to reduce dependency on fluctuatingforeign sources, he said. Canada trails several other industrialized countries in organdonation rates. Spain and the United States, for instance, have organdonor rates at least double that of Canada. http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/06/20/organ-donation.html Edited March 29, 2013 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
waldo Posted March 29, 2013 Report Posted March 29, 2013 Then forget about the G&M thanks for confirming I was correct... clearly you took several liberties with that Globe article you "conveniently" failed to link to. So... tissues only then hey... not organs. Any type of Canadian deaths and related numbers you'd like to attribute to tissue transplants... while you continue to ignore my repeated references to the ~18 Americans dying daily waiting for transplants in the U.S.? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.