Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2013/02/01/technology-columbia-shuttle-damage.html

A moral and ethical question based on this story, and, this statement:

"If it has been damaged, it's probably better not to know. I think the crew would rather not know. Don't you think it would be better for them to have a happy successful flight and die unexpectedly during entry than to stay on orbit, knowing that there was nothing to be done until the air ran out."

If you knew, would you tell? not tell? why?

If you were the one to know, would you want to know? not want to know? why?

The first, I'm not sure. It'd really depend on the persons and the situation, but, I think I'd lean towards telling them.

The second, I would not want to know. Someone calling you and saying "oh, BTW you are trapped and are going to die either frozen in space or in flames in the atmosphere" is not exactly what I'd call a nice surprise.

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!

Posted

Moot issue, as they were prepared to die the minute they volunteered for manned space flight. Space Shuttle (STS) missions were calculated to experience one fatal hull loss every 25 launches/re-entries. The occupation was/is inherently dangerous. So you may as well tell them what they already know.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

If there was absolutely nothing I could do about it, then I wouldn't want to know.

But I'm not religious. A religious person might appreciate the time to make peace with their God.

Posted (edited)

If there was absolutely nothing I could do about it, then I wouldn't want to know.

But I'm not religious. A religious person might appreciate the time to make peace with their God.

Either way...since 1962 or so, NASA has not pulled punches with its crews. This was the whole idea behind having a CAPCOM. Generally a fellow astronaut who has done a similar mission if possible.

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted

If there was absolutely nothing I could do about it, then I wouldn't want to know.

You are dying either way, one way you wait for death in space the other you go for a quicker death with a slim chance of survival... due to pure luck... or may e good construction.

Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst

Posted

Either way...since 1962 or so, NASA has not pulled punches with its crews. This was the whole idea behind having a CAPCOM. Generally a fellow astronaut who has done a similar mission if possible.

Oh yes they have. I saw Apollo 13...

What happened with John Glenn's retro pack?

Guest Derek L
Posted

Oh yes they have. I saw Apollo 13...

What happened with John Glenn's retro pack?

The heat shield on his Mercury capsule was loose.

Posted

Ah, thanks.

Yes, the retro pack on the Mercury capsule was a separate unit and was strapped over the heat shield by cables w/ explosive bolts. After firing the retros, it was to be jettisoned. However, a warning light had come on at Mission Control claiming the heat shield...also jettisonable...was loose. So it was decided on the ground to keep the retro pack on for re-entry. Glenn...no dummy...immediately figured out something was wrong as this was not normal procedure, but MC kept trying to keep him in the dark. Angry, Glenn demanded to be told the truth...and he didn't freak-out...surprise, surprise.

mercury-capsule-drawing.jpg

Posted

The crew already knew they were in trouble when they were inspecting the shuttle in orbit. They used the arm to check the tiles and found concerns. Could have 'easily' sent up a couple other capsules to possibly rescue the group and leave the shuttle in orbit with a plan for a fix. It's not an easy task, but still could have been accomplished. Could have attempted to dock at the space station and attempted some fix.

Posted

This is where I usually make my pitch for the free online project I'm involved with...

Orbiter Space Flight Simulator

The crew already knew they were in trouble when they were inspecting the shuttle in orbit. They used the arm to check the tiles and found concerns. Could have 'easily' sent up a couple other capsules to possibly rescue the group and leave the shuttle in orbit with a plan for a fix. It's not an easy task, but still could have been accomplished. Could have attempted to dock at the space station and attempted some fix.

I think that was a later flight, GH. On the Columbia launch, a large chunk of foam from the ET hit the wing but this wasn't noticed (via film) until many hours later. Risk assessment put the chance of major damage being low....wrong. An Air Force satellite was in a similar orbit, and could have taken some fair resolution pictures of the Columbia from several miles distant...but apparent "in-fighting" between the two...NASA and the USAF...prevented much cooperation from actually occurring.

Posted

I think that was a later flight, GH. On the Columbia launch, a large chunk of foam from the ET hit the wing but this wasn't noticed (via film) until many hours later. Risk assessment put the chance of major damage being low....wrong. An Air Force satellite was in a similar orbit, and could have taken some fair resolution pictures of the Columbia from several miles distant...but apparent "in-fighting" between the two...NASA and the USAF...prevented much cooperation from actually occurring.

Yes indeed you are right. It was Endeavor that used the arm to inspect. I thought they had used it on Columbia as well. Would have proven valuable. Turns out Columbia was not even outfitted with the arm that time around.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Of course you should tell them. Maybe someone can do something. Maybe they can dock with the ISS and return using the emergency Soyuz return vehicle docked there, or wait for rescue. There are a lot of smart people with a lot of ingenuity working on these things, you don't just give up and let people die.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...