dre Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Advocating a false equality of rights between a made-up group, the Palestinians, and Israel. Since they are on the same land the argument always runs against Israel. Theres nothing antisemitic about that at all. Theres millions of palestinians that live on the same land they were born on, and no other government claims that land or them as citizens. Why would their rights to that land be any different than the rights of jews that moved there from Europe or the US 80 years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 (edited) What Israel does is what any civilized or advance people do in response to savagery in neighboring areas. Build wells, piplelines, and pumping stations? YEah! Everyones doin it! Edited January 22, 2013 by dre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonam Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Build wells, piplelines, and pumping stations? YEah! Everyones doin it! You mean kind of like Canada building oil wells and pipelines on native land? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Build wells, piplelines, and pumping stations? YEah! Everyones doin it! The Arabs did nothing with the land and then the Jews arrived and did do something productive. Sucks to be the Arabs in that situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud Posted January 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 one ironic comment after another. how can one who advocates for israel and israelis, who came to be in the 1940's, have the balls to call the palestinians a made up group? how can one who constantly reminds everyone about the ethnic cleansing of one group of people, again, in the 1940's, now be advocating it against another group by the same people who experienced it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 ...how can one who constantly reminds everyone about the ethnic cleansing of one group of people, again, in the 1940's, now be advocating it against another group by the same people who experienced it? how can one advocate for Palestinian terrorist rights to land while occupying unceded First Nations' territory in British Columbia ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud Posted January 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 how can one advocate for Palestinian terrorist rights stop being an anti-semite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 What Israel does is what any civilized or advance people do in response to savagery in neighboring areas. That's certainly the official cover story for their premeditated ethnic cleansing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud Posted January 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 It's not a "foreign" group...it is American as apple pie. I think Americans do/should care more than Canadians about their own country's foreign policy. nothing to see here. Indeed, many of the dozen benefactors Rosen named, including entertainment mogul Haim Saban and Slim-Fast billionaire Daniel Abraham, are also major donors to AIPAC, which fired him after the Justice Department charged him with illegally giving classified information to Washington Post reporter Glenn Kessler and an Israeli Embassy official. Rosen says his actions were common practice at the organization. He said his next move is to show that AIPAC, Washington’s major pro-Israeli lobbying group by far, regularly traffics in sensitive U.S. government information, especially material related to the Middle East. But Rosen said he would produce “statements of AIPAC employees to the FBI, internal documents, deposition statements, public statements and other evidence showing that [the] receipt of classified information by employees other than [himself] ... was condoned … for months prior to being condemned in March 2005 after threats from the prosecutors.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud Posted January 31, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 (edited) the first rule of the israel lobby - there is no israel lobby Edited January 31, 2013 by bud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Did anyone see Hagel's confirmation hearing? If not, he was an utter disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Did anyone see Hagel's confirmation hearing? If not, he was an utter disaster. I think what was an udder disaster was Republicans going after Hagel for crazy things like once he interviewed on Al Jazeera English a well respected and often quoted news source. Why shouldn't a public figure go on news networks? Oh thats right Republicans think Fox is the only network that should ever exist. What a bunch of ignorant fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 I think what was an udder disaster was Republicans going after Hagel for crazy things like once he interviewed on Al Jazeera English a well respected and often quoted news source. Why shouldn't a public figure go on news networks? Oh thats right Republicans think Fox is the only network that should ever exist. What a bunch of ignorant fools. Nope. It was a disaster because of what he said. Or do you also think that Iran's government is legitimately elected? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Yep...he got pummeled today, and at one point maintained his criticism of President Obama's decision to "surge" in Afghanistan. Senator McCain gave him a chance to fess up, but Hagel would not concede the point. Good luck Chuck...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Nope. It was a disaster because of what he said. Or do you also think that Iran's government is legitimately elected? You are a crazy person. Want to find me some evidence to the contrary? See I base my opinions on evidence while you do it on ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 You are a crazy person. Want to find me some evidence to the contrary? See I base my opinions on evidence while you do it on ignorance. You need evidence to realize that the Iranian regime isn't legitimately elected? Seriously? Wow. Stay classy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 You need evidence to realize that the Iranian regime isn't legitimately elected? Seriously? Wow. Stay classy. Tell me more about your knowledge of then power structure of Iran Shady. I wantto kknow more about your knowledge on the subject vs. ThatMr Hagel said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Tell me more about your knowledge of then power structure of Iran Shady. I wantto kknow more about your knowledge on the subject vs. ThatMr Hagel said. Ever heard of the supreme leader? The mullahs? Did you see any of the violent protests? Come'on man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Ever heard of the supreme leader? The mullahs? Did you see any of the violent protests? Come'on man. Tell me more about who makes decisions. I believe even Canada has a Queen of does that make us a monarchy? Tell me more about the inner workings of the Iranian government? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Tell me more about who makes decisions. I believe even Canada has a Queen of does that make us a monarchy? Tell me more about the inner workings of the Iranian government? /facepalm Yep, we're just like Iran. Never mind punked, I forgot I'm trying to talk to an adolescent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 I believe even Canada has a Queen of does that make us a monarchy? By definition...yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 By definition...yes. So if Hagel had said Canada is a Democracy Shady would disagree as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 /facepalm Yep, we're just like Iran. Never mind punked, I forgot I'm trying to talk to an adolescent. I am asking you about the power structure and governmental make up of Iran. You have yet to demonstrate any knowledge yet you criticize someoe wwhile you know nothing. Please explain to me then power structure of Iran Shady. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 I am asking you about the power structure and governmental make up of Iran. You have yet to demonstrate any knowledge yet you criticize someoe wwhile you know nothing. Please explain to me then power structure of Iran Shady. The supreme leader runs the show. The queen does not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 So if Hagel had said Canada is a Democracy Shady would disagree as well? Technically Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy and a Federal Parliamentary Democracy. This way you and Shady are both right and can stop being children for a page or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.