Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Peeves
Posted (edited)

and fermenting strife and anarchy within governments, and lobbying for Israel., and controlling the media, dabble in other things and reportedly doitwell.

http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/2009/10/number_of_jews_who_have_received_the_nobel_prize.html

Since 1901 there were 106 years in which Nobel Prizes were awarded. At least one Jew has won in 73 of those years. That is, Jews have won in over 68% of all award years.

As of today, 800 individuals have been awarded a Nobel Prize (including the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science). Of those, 178 (of which 8 were Peace Prizes) went to Jews (22.25% of all recipients). If measured by percent of world population, less than 2 Jews should have been awarded any prizes.

Edited by Peeves
Guest Peeves
Posted

Would you say that when it comes to winning Nobel prizes, Jews doitwell?

I thunk I done did.

Posted

From the quote in the OP:

Even more telling, by percent of world population, Muslims should have garnered 200 Nobel Prizes but only 8 (of which 5 were Peace Prizes) actually did.

Before Islam made them stupid, before Islam hobbled their minds, before Islam stifled their creativity, Arabs were inquisitive, smart, inventive, clever fellows who made great contributions to civilization. That is to say, they were just like their Semite cousins the Jews.

---

Peeves, here's my problem with your reasoning, or the reasoning of the blogger that you quote. (And yes, I may breach Godwin's Law.)

The Nazis said similar things about Jews in the 1920s/1930s as your OP says about Muslims today: "They are a scourge on civilized society etc, etc."

There were several million Jews in Germany in the 1920s and there are hundreds of millions of Muslims in the world today. To paraphrase an American president: a few psychopaths can be a scourge, and millions of people can be in error, but I simply cannot believe that millions of people are a scourge.

If someone tries to tell me that millions of people in a religious group are a danger to civilized society, then I look more closely at the someone making the claim than the religious group.

Posted

There were several million Jews in Germany in the 1920s and there are hundreds of millions of Muslims in the world today. To paraphrase an American president: a few psychopaths can be a scourge, and millions of people can be in error, but I simply cannot believe that millions of people are a scourge.

If someone tries to tell me that millions of people in a religious group are a danger to civilized society, then I look more closely at the someone making the claim than the religious group.

Hitler wouldn't have been a scourge without those millions of Germans backing him up. It wasn't him that conquered Poland, it was the Germans 'in error'. But that made little practical difference to the Poles.

Those hundreds of millions of Muslims are no real scourge. But their primitive mindset and socially retrograde religion are. Why? Because their numbers are growing, and their leadership seems not to shrink at all from violence and confrontation. Nor is there much sign of moderation through the Muslim world. In fact, every Muslim nation I'm aware of is becoming more and more severe in its interpretation of their religion. In ten years women won't be allowed to leave the home in Egypt without being clad in a black bedsheet, and I doubt Turkey is far behind.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Guest Peeves
Posted

C'mon guys, this was tongue in cheek for our skinheaded friend in house. I meant no particular point.

Posted

Would you say that when it comes to winning Nobel prizes, Jews doitwell?

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

C'mon guys, this was tongue in cheek for our skinheaded friend in house. I meant no particular point.

Some of us got that immediately, Peeves, no worries.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...