Smallc Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 20 days sick time for 10 months is pretty standard, I would think. most people get 4 hours every 2 weeks. Quote
Boges Posted March 2, 2012 Author Report Posted March 2, 2012 (edited) The whole ideas of a given amount of sick days is pretty crazy IMHO. There's nothing to stop you from using them when you're not sick. And if you can bank them then what's to stop you from going to work sick because banking them is more important than keeping your co-workers from getting sick. Now I'm not saying you shouldn't get sick days but to make a finite amount of them available only leads to abuse. As for the pay freeze. Cry me a river!!!! Who budgets for increased wealth years in advance? Only a public servant with a job for life would. I read in the star today that the teachers got pay increases of like 8% a year. If you had an expectation of continued raises then why have contracts expire in the first place? Now if you were banking those sick days depending on that payout later. TOUGH! Many people have it much worse than you and that benefit was totally extravagant to begin with. And you have an excellent pension that used to own the Maple Leafs. I feel we're going to see more of this as pensions people were promised become more and more unsustainable, even in the public sector. Edited March 2, 2012 by Boges Quote
Smallc Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 Just to be clear, I don't think that going forward, anyone should be able to cash out sick days. Those are for when you're sick, and nothing else. Quote
Boges Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Posted March 3, 2012 Just to be clear, I don't think that going forward, anyone should be able to cash out sick days. Those are for when you're sick, and nothing else. Yes. Heck I don't even get to bank unused vacation days. I have to use them up before a certain date or they evaporate. Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 I just read that if teacher bank all their alloted sick days they can receive up to a 46,000 payout at retirement above and beyond their incredible pension. That's like a severance check for retiring. Does nobody get retirement bonus or retirement bonus anymore? I'm not trying to justify it. I just remember that being something that happened at one point in high skilled/professional jobs. Maybe I'm thinking of something else. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 Yes. Heck I don't even get to bank unused vacation days. I have to use them up before a certain date or they evaporate. What do you do? Just curious. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Boges Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Posted March 3, 2012 What do you do? Just curious. Not going to reveal that on this website. But it's non-union. I'm perfectly happy with the arrangement I have in regards to vacation/sick days. Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 The whole ideas of a given amount of sick days is pretty crazy IMHO. There's nothing to stop you from using them when you're not sick. And if you can bank them then what's to stop you from going to work sick because banking them is more important than keeping your co-workers from getting sick. In the real world, I talk to my boss tell him my kids are sick and have him write it in as a vacation day. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Boges Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Posted March 3, 2012 In the real world, I talk to my boss tell him my kids are sick and have him write it in as a vacation day. That's a problem "in the real world". I've had co-workers that call in sick because their kids are sick. It can become a problem, but what are you going to do? What I am saying is that having set number of sick days can make it very difficult for employers to use discretion. Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 That's a problem "in the real world". I've had co-workers that call in sick because their kids are sick. It can become a problem, but what are you going to do? What I am saying is that having set number of sick days can make it very difficult for employers to use discretion. Maybe we shouldn't call them sick days at all. Maybe that is the problem. Just lump all peronal days (vacation, medical, personal etc) into one category that is expected to be used up by the end of the year. Can't remember which "right to work state" had a company that did "25 days, use for illness or vacation" Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Boges Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Maybe that is the problem. Just lump all peronal days (vacation, medical, personal etc) into one category that is expected to be used up by the end of the year. If that was the case then people wouldn't take a sick day unless they had to. Unless I'm very sick I usually come into work(I have an office job so it's not incredibly taxing on my body) and make sure my absence wouldn't ruin my co-workers day before I ask to take the rest of the day off. That's usually when I have a very bad cold. I had a minor case of the Flu a few years back but it was during the H1N1 hysteria and one of the ladies I was working with was pregnant so I took two days off with no problems. Edited March 3, 2012 by Boges Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYR2bMXxf6s&list=UUmGRXuwpyh6F1kqABnSb7ug&index=1&feature=plcpEND Dalton McGuinty's request to teachers to bend over and take it without any negotiating. (I think that is what annoy's teacher's about this, again, the ones I know were expecting freezes and benefit reduction) Edited March 3, 2012 by MiddleClassCentrist Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Boges Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) I can't watch that man talk without wanting to cause myself harm. Edited March 3, 2012 by Boges Quote
Guest Peeves Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 That's not what it is. I have worked in both a school and an early childcare centre. They are very different, though both have a very strong educational component. Pure unadulterated B/S in my opinion. A 4 year old unless a savant or genius gets a better upbringing by a caring parent than by an untrained teacher on early childhood needs. "Very strong educational component indeed!, for a 4 year old! What, learning not to bite, kick or scratch? Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 I can't watch that man talk without wanting to cause myself harm. It's tough to do. I don't deny it. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
lukin Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 Pure unadulterated B/S in my opinion. A 4 year old unless a savant or genius gets a better upbringing by a caring parent than by an untrained teacher on early childhood needs. "Very strong educational component indeed!, for a 4 year old! What, learning not to bite, kick or scratch? Absolutely 100% correct. Quote
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 John Tory talks with OSSTF Federation President http://www.osstf.on.ca/john-tory-cfrb CliffNotes - OSSTF understands that we need to look at saving money - OSSTF wants a specific cut target so that they can be involved in finding creative solutions. - OSSTF gives example of taking benefits liabilities off of the governments books and into the Unions to save hundreds of millions. Basically, the government is not actually "talking" with them to find ways to save the money they are looking to save because the are not giving a specific figure amount that needs to be cut. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Smallc Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 "Very strong educational component indeed!, for a 4 year old! What, learning not to bite, kick or scratch? Again, you really need to be informed on what you're talking about here. You're obviously not. A school is a far more structured environment, and by nursery, students are spending their time doing actual school study work. ECEs and daycare centres deal with initial learning, or learning how to learn. Quote
lukin Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 Again, you really need to be informed on what you're talking about here. You're obviously not. A school is a far more structured environment, and by nursery, students are spending their time doing actual school study work. ECEs and daycare centres deal with initial learning, or learning how to learn. We always hear much about how great Finland's educational system is. Finnish students don't begin FORMAL education until the age of 7. Before that age, is plenty of unstructured play time; basically letting kids be kids. Expecting 3 or 4 yr olds to sit still in school is wrong, and when they can't sit still, drugs are recommended. I wonder how many people in the next 10 to 15 years will be negatively affected by the their much too easy ritalin prescriptions? Quote
Smallc Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 We always hear much about how great Finland's educational system is. Funny, because we hear the same thing about Canada's. Quote
lukin Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 Funny, because we hear the same thing about Canada's. Where? Public education in Saskatchewan and Manitoba isn't even mediocre. Quote
Smallc Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 Where? Public education in Saskatchewan and Manitoba isn't even mediocre. Canada ranks extremely well, and there's nothing wrong with public education in Manitoba. Quote
lukin Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 Canada ranks extremely well, and there's nothing wrong with public education in Manitoba. There is plenty wrong. You must be a teacher. Quote
lukin Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 Manitoba is great. That's why they are at the bottom o the barrel in math. More essential mat please. Quote
Smallc Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 There is plenty wrong. You must be a teacher. I am not. I am a small business owner who was very happy with his education. If you didn't get something from it, that was your own fault. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.