Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Again, we have CBC talking about selling the jets and renting private jets, again displaying a complete lack of understanding of the purpose of the jets.

It was kind of funny, but not. We have to take a break now, but we'll be back to talk about the world going to hell...or, and Skewering Peter Mackay too,

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
What? That has nothing to do with the Government of Canada (other than the comparatively small amount that they send in transfers).

....

Actually, they are calculated. We don't have funds for them now, no, because we haven't collected them...

No, they are not calculated.

Canada's health insurance system is "pay as you go", like the US Social Security (pension) system.

In Canada, we have no fund to pay for future health costs. And in the US, they have no fund for future pension costs.

----

Smallc, between the US and Canada, who is being more unrealistic?

Posted

You've stated that people like Jean Chretien need to be flown around on private jets and then invoke his name to take a shot at him?

Oh wait...what you're saying is it's only acceptable if it's your kind...

Once again, this is about that foreign concept to you: judgement. Yes, Jean Chretien had to be flown by private jet. However, you can take anything to extremes, and he did so. His time in office was one long holiday, flying everywhere and anywhere, often with a second jet following the first just in case there was a breakdown. I think he set an all-time record for amount of time on 'official visits' to warm countries during the winter months.

Hypocrite.

For that assessment to be valid, it would have to come from someone mature enough and smart enough to understand what it means.

I'm thinking that's not the case here.

None of these pompous over rated politicians or waste of skin army jackboots need to be flown anywhere on a private jet paid for with taxpayers money for their personal benefits.

That's just a blindly dumb statement that appears based more on bitterness and resentment of someone being important and having an important job, as opposed to any valid assessment of the needs to fly on private jets.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Alas he doesn't because he's got gullible sheep like yourself who fawn over him and think he's entitled to his entitlements.

It has nothing to do with entitlements and everything to do with common sense, safety and efficiency.

But truth is, he's not important. He's only made important because the warmongering right wing and military lackeys want him to be.

He is important. He'd be important if he was running any organization with a hundred thousand employees that spent billions of dollars. Your rabble babble contempt for the military is colouring your already poor judgement.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I say we start by axing the bloated military's budget.

I say we don't. And guess what? I'm in charge! :lol:

But first and formost, stop allowing the waste of tax dollars so today's video game junkies get the chance to go play GI Joe in real life...

Troops should only be used in a combat mission when they are defending this country's borders.

Uhhm, yeah, sure. So what we'll do is we'll stop wasting tax dollars, and we'll wait until someone is 'on our border' then we'll, I guess, start recruiting soldiers, and maybe let out bids on new military equipment for them to use. A few years later, they'll be all set to 'defend this country's borders'!

Pure military genius!

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

You have any proof that he wasn't?

Wow. New lows for moronic arguments.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)
It has nothing to do with entitlements and everything to do with common sense, safety and efficiency.

---

He is important. He'd be important if he was running any organization with a hundred thousand employees that spent billions of dollars. Your rabble babble contempt for the military is colouring your already poor judgement.

He is important?

Argus, "he is just some guy."

----

Argus, this "he is important" argument is tiresome. To be ironic, or 21st century, do young blonde chicks want to sleep with him? If not, he's not important.

Edited by August1991
Posted

The simple fact is that ordinary people, in this 21st century, will no longer pay for this nonsense.

Ordinary people have more important things to worry about.

Politicians in democracies are beginning to understand this. Obama, for example, financed his campaign differently.

Oh, do tell! I was under the belief he financed his campaign like everyone else - through selling his influence to a number of wealthy individuals, corporations and lobby groups.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Smallc, between the US and Canada, who is being more unrealistic?

Considering their feral debt is 100% of GDP and their budget deficit is about 10% of GDP, definitely them...of course, Canadians themselves are taking on far more debt than they should.

Posted

He is important?

Yes

Argus, "he is just some guy."

No.

Argus, this "he is important" argument is tiresome. To be ironic, or 21st century, do young blonde chicks want to sleep with him? If not, he's not important.

It's becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Posted (edited)
It's becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.
[irony]Smallc, you are right. I have no idea of anything.

[irony]Federal government bureaucrats can spend money with abandon. There is no problem. They can do this far into the future without any problem.

----

Smallc, I am a federalist. I believe that Canada is better served with small government. I believe in firewalls.

Edited by August1991
Posted

Federal government bureaucrats can spend money with abandon. There is no problem. They can do this far into the future without any problem.

See, this is part of what you don't get. He isn't just some federal bureaucrat.

Posted (edited)
That became evident some time ago; back when he lumped the CDS, the governor general, and the Queen in under the banner "minor government/State officials".
But they are. They live on my back, and yet they supposedly serve me.
If Bill Gates/Rod Stewart has the money to avoid security and make planes wait, fine. But IMV, too many minor government/State officials (the GG/Queen/Parliamentary Secretaries/Canada's CDS) have usurped this importance.

They, and their families, use my debit cards and my credit cards to pay their private flights, first class air tickets and five star hotels.

I am a democrat, but I want no more of this 21st century form of democratic government.

Bambino, this cannot continue. These "minor government/State officials" are spending too much of my money. Unless this changes soon, the end will not be good.

Edited by August1991
Posted

They are; they live on my back, they serve me.

They live on your back? No wonder you have such a problem with them.

Bambino, this cannot continue. These "minor government/State officials" are spending too much.

You seem to have this thing, where if you say something over and over again, you think that it's true. It isn't. The Chief of the Defence Staff is not a minor official, and no matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it so.

Posted
They live on your back? No wonder you have such a problem with them.

...

You seem to have this thing, where if you say something over and over again, you think that it's true. It isn't. The Chief of the Defence Staff is not a minor official, and no matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it so.

Where do you draw the line, Smallc? Who is a "minor official" and who is not?

I don't think that you and bambino understand how modern government works. In big government, everyone is "important". That is, everyone in government spends other people's money to promote the "public interest" and because their actions are "important".

Posted (edited)

Where do you draw the line, Smallc? Who is a "minor official" and who is not?

It's like this - the CDS isn't a minor official. His deputy's, deputy's, deputy, well, now you might be on to something. Probably not though. Generals are never really minor officials.

Edited by Smallc
Posted
They live on my back, and yet they supposedly serve me.

Supposedly serve you? Do they or don't they?

Of course they do. They all have key functions in the governance and life of this country, and they require funds to carry it all out.

These "minor government/State officials" are spending too much of my money. Unless this changes soon, the end will not be good.

Too much of your money... And here I thought you payed the same taxes as the rest of us.

The planes are paid for regardless of whether or not anyone's in them. If you want less spent on them, fine. But, don't take your frustrations out on individuals who can't do much about the problem. Planes could be sold through Order-in-Council, but budgets are passed through parliament. Go yell outside the door there.

Posted (edited)

He didn't do anything wrong.

1. It was the Harper Government that approved the flights.

2. It was the advisory on the use of flights that approved the flights.

In direct line they would be in error not him. I think he would be in a conflict of interest in making those decisions himself, and it doesn't appear that was the case, end of story.

End of story.

If there is any "controversy or problem" here, it is the Harper Government that is the problem.

Edited by William Ashley

I was here.

Posted

He didn't do anything wrong.

1. It was the Harper Government that approved the flights.

2. It was the advisory on the use of flights that approved the flights.

In direct line they would be in error not him. I think he would be in a conflict of interest in making those decisions himself, and it doesn't appear that was the case, end of story.

End of story.

If there is any "controversy or problem" here, it is the Harper Government that is the problem.

That’s a interesting perspective……..”hate the game, not the player” I suppose………Good point William.

Posted (edited)
Too much of your money... And here I thought you payed the same taxes as the rest of us.

The planes are paid for regardless of whether or not anyone's in them.

Government bureaucrats reason as you, bambino, when they spend other people's money. "The limo was sitting there. What difference does it make?"
He didn't do anything wrong.
He didn't do anything wrong, and nor did any other bureaucrat. They just spent a few pennies of my money.

There are some 35 million Canadians. If each lost two pennies, most would probably not notice it. If you lost a penny, would you notice it?

And yet, 35 million pennies would mean $350,000 - and two pennies, $700,000. That eliminates a mortgage in the Glebe.

It is terrifying to think how modern federal governments spend money. At the stroke of a pen, Stephen Harper can pay off your mortgage - and no one will notice! Who notices two cents?

----

I was recently discussing politics/banking with an American friend and he finally said: "Canada? You have the population of Los Angeles! Who cares about Canada?" Canada, Los Angeles, Schwarzenegger, California, or Harper?

In my mind, I thought of Obama.

What happens when you have the power to tax and spend one tenth of a penny of other people's money (a loss they'll never notice) - but make one person very, very rich? Rich enough that the person's children will always be free to choose.

Edited by August1991
  • 1 year later...
Guest Derek L
Posted (edited)

I agree 100%…………This storey is just the creation of news………….As was mentioned, the Challengers are already paid for, the aircrew aren't making any more or any less flying the CDS or nothing around and all the trips, including the flight to meet his family on vacation, which was required since he missed his already paid commercial flight to attend a ramp ceremony……….I'm glad the CDS basically told them to pound sand when asked if he'd resign, or pay back the cost of the flights.

Well it's been over a year, but an update from a few days ago:

http://www.thestar.c...challenger-jets

The federal government is clipping the wings of its fleet of Challenger jets, a travel perk that’s come to symbolize high-flying excess.

With four of the jets due to reach the end of their lifespan by 2014, the Conservative government is likely going to be parking them rather than make the investments needed to keep them flying.

No decision has been made yet but a source said Monday that the funding squeeze on the defence department makes it all but certain that fleet of six VIP transport jets will be downsized.

Countdown until the NDP Quebec caucus calls for replacements Challengers built by Bombardier………… rolleyes.gif

It's funny that these two factoids were not mentioned last year:

Sensitive to that optic—and with belt-tightening now underway across government — the Conservatives have sought to curtail their own use of the jets. Jay Paxton, spokesperson for Defence Minister Peter MacKay, said the use of the Challengers by cabinet ministers has been cut by 80 per cent since the Tories took office in 2006.

And:

The two jets left in the fleet will likely be reserved for the prime minister and the governor general. The Prime Minister is barred from using commercial flights for security reasons.

The remaining jets will also be able to perform medevac flights when required. The Challengers have been used ferrying soldiers seriously wounded in Afghanistan from a hospital in Germany back to Canada.

Edited by Derek L
Posted (edited)

Well it's been over a year, but an update from a few days ago:

http://www.thestar.c...challenger-jets

Countdown until the NDP Quebec caucus calls for replacements Challengers built by Bombardier………… rolleyes.gif

It's funny that these two factoids were not mentioned last year:

And:

Bombardier is packed for its orders for the mid term.

The orders likely wouldn't be able to be filled in time to replace the outgoing challengers.

It'd be better off for them to just buy some of these and rennovate..

http://www.jameslist.com/jets?ref=icon

Fact is though we have regular flights and just buying the CF (or rcmp) some helicopters and having those fly execs to the nearest airport should fullfill needs 99%.. its not like execs need to be that mobile. If a helicopter and regular flight by air ambulance, police helicopter or cf helicopter isn't sufficient in an emergency, it is a joke. They'd be better off leasing when needed or buying a regular coach or first class ticket on their sheltered company air canada. Hard sell to protect it if they don't use it themselves.

The air is one of the most dangerous places to be during an emergency (without air escort)

You can buy one of these for the cost of a challenger flight

http://www.jameslist...for-sale-510227

You can probably buy all these for the cost of one challenger and put them at major regional airports for police operations and emergencies

9014812_small2.jpg

Eurocopter

EC120 Colibri

€ 650,000

2007 Robinson R44 Raven II for Sale

tn_r44-raven-2_2007_1.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_1.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_1.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_2.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_2.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_3.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_3.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_4.jpgtn_r44-raven-2_2007_4.jpg

Click on Thumbnails to enlarge.

Contact Seller... By eMail...Name: Robinson R44 Raven II

Message...Your Email:

Description:

2007 Robinson R44 Raven II for sale. 1830 Hours TT, flown daily. Maintained to Transport Canada Commercial Standards. For further information please call or email...

Price: $218,000 CND

Location: Canada

2007 Robinson R44 Raven II

Exterior: Viper Blue with Back and white Stripes that can be removed

Interior: Grey Leather

Avionics/Instruments: 1-Kanad 406 ELT 1-VHF 1-Transponder 1-4 place intercom

Equipment: Dart baffle kit Dart floor protectors Dart Cargo mirror Dart Bear Paws All AD's and ASB's are up to date except for SB-78A (fuel Bladder not due yet)

OK one execujet

Bombardier/Challenger 604

7,900,000 USD

Check this...

http://www.controlle...px?OHID=1225375 price is a little high but a funny plane.. higher than the aquisition price I would do but I can picture rigging it for computer AI drone or attaching a AtA missile or AtS missile on it. For each f35 scrapped you can aquire 200 of these... with AI guidance and alitimiter and ground sensing and preampped landform from a simple application like google earth novel avoidance ... you could probably turn these into cruise missiles for less than the cost of a cruise missile.

3 f35's could give every member of parliament their own personal jet that could be set up for autopilot and weaponized if needed.

less than 100k for this one..

http://www.jameslist...-for-sale-27284

You could trow in some flight lessons to then you can cut the pilot requirements during emergencies... do it yourself solution.. the execs could afford their own ride at that price.

These might be nice if they could be refurbises for escort

1985 MiG 29 US$ 1,500,000 Ukraine 1.5 m is quite a bit.... but when you think about it it ain't bad as a VIP transport

1980 MiG 21UM US$ 40,000 Czech Republic

1980 MiG 21UM US$ 88,000 Czech Republic

MiG 21MF US$ 4,500 California, USA

still for sale

The jets will give Canadian air technicians something to learn about russian aircraft and specialize on. (and if Russia or the East attacks they will be confused to hell) - they are being used in Syria... they can go faster than the f35's too..

  • Maximum speed: 2,228 km/h (1,468 mph)
  • Maximum speed: Mach 2.05
  • Range: (internal fuel) 1,210 km (751 miles)
  • Service ceiling: 17,800 m (58,400 ft)

They are getting a little old but sounds like they havn't been flown all that much for the last while and may be able to be maintained for a bit.

Right if they are flying in copters.. then they might as well be learning to fly while they are being transported.

Throw these things instead of the airport shuttle throw one of them Canadian flags onto them

9653868_small2.jpg

Kreidler

Florett

€ 2,950

4778199_small2.jpg

BSA

s30-18

€ 6,750

check this out

http://www.jameslist...for-sale-567068

Also new makeup face or a disguise artist/makeup artist in security detail should be able to secure transport of a VIP on commercial airline.

http://www.hybridfx....ges/company.htm

It can be taken one step further with Gaurd becomes exec Exec becomes gaurd switch.

I'd be crafty with pickup too.. not just airmail.. but like when a CF ship went into port of call they could roll the bike or land the helicopter and take it home on the boat.

Forget about freight costs, actually put the boats to use hauling back goods from ports of call.

Or better yet... buy the boats too

9702525_small2.jpg

Boston Whaler

2012 Metan Vintage B..

€ 21,177

9596715_small2.jpg

Riva

St Tropez Nr. 283

€ 60,000

and use them as coast gaurd, and ferry boats...

need a quiet place for a meeting forget down town toronto put it in the middle of lake ontario with a frigate or (frigates)next to it. or on an light Aircraft carrier

These arn't the only buys either.. .there are lots of sweet deals out there.

These could be used for Ferry services for instance...

9697208_small2.jpg

Custom

Ferry

€ 3,500,000

With 1 billion on security costs for the g20 you could have filled lake ontario with yacths like these...

3690045_small2.jpg

Orucoglu Yacht and M..

Miss Tor 270

€ 42,990,000

  • 3690056_small2.jpg
    € 32,000,000

10160050_small2.jpg

<a href="http://www.jameslist...or-sale-582962" title="Kingship Motor Yacht">Kingship

Motor Yacht

€ 12,705,991

3679404_small2.jpg

Trinity Yachts

Motor Yacht

€ 30,763,900

3679193_small2.jpg

Christensen Yachts

Motor Yacht

€ 15,324,195

Throw some SAM shoulder launch and CAWS (gattlin guns or THEL platorms on these suckers and you have an interdiction and defence system.)

OR NEW NAVAL SHIPS WHAT ABOUT BUYING

Featured Advert!Click here for 11 photos and more information preview_274412_1.jpg?1350145971 FOR CHARTER KNM Horten In DNV Class and ready for work. Can be mobilised immediately any where in the world. The vessel has been new certificated in February 2012 in DNV for 5 years with World wide trade certificate ice class c. The vessel has civilian crew on board. The vessel was built as a Navy Supply vessel for Sub Marines and MTB Motor Torpedo Boats, in 1978 and have only 37.000 engine hours since new. This vessel was built after DNV rules applicable for ice class C type vessels. She has been used as a School ship for the Norwegian Navy for many years. 400... read more Year: 1978 Length: 88m Location: Oslo Norway Status: Available Contact: matt ward Email: Send Enquiry Telephone: 07875018376

Even just reusing the hull could save money even with engine upgrades if required.

This one from the ukraine....

Commercial: For Sale: Fast Patrol Craft Sea Magic preview_279735_1.jpg?1352334346 Impregnable and Invisible Fast and Operative Littoral Missions Weapon employment in Sea States up to 7 The most economic Bottom Hull Innovative design This is New generation of Fast Patrol Craft based on the Hydrodynamics innovations, advanced Naval Architecture for littoral, brown-water missions, where efficiency, low cost, shallow draft are the new priorities for the next-generation craft. Boat employment in Sea States up to 5 without course/speed limitations at max allowed propulsion power, and in Sea State up to 9 at a speed of up to 30 knots inclusive A fast, highly-maneu... read more Year: 2013 Length: 108' Status: Available Price: USD $3,600,000 [CAD $3,601,080.00 Approx] Location: Ukraine View Full Listing And Contact Advertiser

Another steal...

Commercial: For Sale: Fast Attack Craft preview_279609_1.jpg?1352240138 This is New generation of Fast Combatl Craft based on the Hydrodynamics innovation, advanced STEALTH and Naval Architecture... read more Year: 2013 Length: 178' Status: Available Location: British Virgin Islands British Virgin Islands View Full Listing And Contact Advertiser

This is only 1.7 million

Commercial: For Sale: Coast Guard 33 meter ready for quick delivery Featured Advert!Click here for 37 photos and more information preview_254297_1.jpg?1339064637 CLASS: Norwegian Navy Coast Guard 2 TONNAGE: GT: 184 NT: 55 Displ tonnage: 96 LOA: 33.1 meter Breadth: 6.8 m Draught: 1.8 m PAX: Was build for 77 soldiers 2 x pitch propeller Bow thruster Speed: Max 28 Service 22... read more Year: 1992 Length: 33m Location: Haakonsvern Naval base Norway Status: Available Price: EUR €1,300,000 [CAD $1,653,808.97 Approx] Contact: Norsk Megling & Auksjon AS Email: Send Enquiry Telephone: +47 90186230

This could be used for Ferry service and cargo.

These things are hulks and super weaponizable...

Commercial: For Sale: 375' RORO, LOLO, Container, Cargo Ship Featured Advert!Click here for 1 photo and more information preview_142493_1.jpg? New Annual inspection, update SOLAS, Drydock 2010, Panama Flag, Polish Registry of Shipping - IACS Member Built Lubeck, Germany 1980 Engines: Prupp Mak Maschinenbau, supercharged x 2 3 Diesel generators 432 KFA plus 1 emergency 70KVA genset Max speed 14 knots Service speed 12 knots at 2MT per day Capacity: 359 cars or 70 - 40ft containers or cargo trailers. 2900 MT car and cargo capacity. Contact us for further information.... read more Length: 375' Location: Egypt Status: Available Price: GBP £3,000,000 [CAD $4,772,423.66 Approx] Contact: Midcoast Yacht and Ship Brokerage Email: Send Enquiry Telephone: 207-372-1015

This could be used as a fishing boat...

Commercial: For Sale: FREEZER STERN TRAWLER 40m #4318 preview_199653_1.jpg? FREEZER STERN TRAWLER - NOTE - VESSEL NEVER WORKED - INCLUDES EU LICENCE . . . . . . FISHROOM - 3 holds: 2 upper holds of total 170 m3 capable of freezing at -4 C 1 lower hold of 390 m3 capable of freezing at -25 C. . . .... read more Year: 1996 Length: 40m Status: Available Price: EUR €1,500,000 [CAD $1,908,241.12 Approx] Location: West Greece Greece View Full Listing And Contact Advertiser

'

as well as patrol and merchant marine.

This one is already in NS.. for a rock bottom price even as a stationary offshore platform.

Featured Advert!Click here for 12 photos and more information preview_204661_1.jpg? STERN TRAWLER in Good running condition Painted about 5 years ago. LENGTH: 117' BEAM: 28' DRAFT: 11' BUILT: 1971 GROSS TONS: 365.73 NET TONS: 177.14 ENGINE: CATERPILLER D399 turbo, operated annually 1200 hp at 1200 RPM Speed reported 10 knots VARIABLE PITCH PROP Bottom cleaned by diver in 2011 Hull and machinery reported in good condition, owners will have in running condition Asking $195,000.... read more Year: 1971 Length: 117' Location: Nova Scotia Canada Status: Available Price: USD $195,000 [CAD $195,058.50 Approx] Contact: Midcoast Yacht and Ship Brokerage - New York, USA Email: Send Enquiry Telephone: 207-372-1015

Sails have been used for centuries...

142' Grand Banks Fishing Schooner - Passenger Cargo Sailing Ship

  • Year: 1942
  • Current Price: US$ 325,000
  • Located in Boothbay Harbor, Maine, ME
  • Hull Material: Wood
  • Engine/Fuel Type: Single diesel
  • YW# 74503-2445967

photo_gallery.gif button_fullspec.gif button_email.gif

Other photos: Photo 1, Photo 2, Photo 3, Photo 4, Photo 5, Photo 6, Photo 7, Photo 8, Photo 9, Photo 10, Photo 11, Photo 12, Photo 13.

The Sherman Zwicker is an auxilary diesel powered Grand Banks dory fishing schooner. She has been restored and is continually upgraded. Her Fairbanks Morse 6 cylinder diesel was completely rebuilt in 2010 and is a fascinating part of this amazing vessel. She has had the very best of care since her purchase in 1968. The Zwicker is also a museum portraying the industry of the Grand Banks fisheries and the men who worked these boats.

For more history, please Google: Schooner Sherman Zwicker

Our goal is to find the right individual, organization or business that can prove the ability to care for this historic vessel and keep her going for the next generations to enjoy and marvel at. This is a rare opportunity and we look forward to your inquiry. Price negotiable.

Please contact the listing broker to learn how this vessel would be gifted to a non-profit organization that can prove financial abililty to maintain this vessel

Click on image to enlarge

87' Classic American Passenger Schooner

  • Year: 1923
  • Current Price: US$ 395,000
  • Located in Maine Coast, ME
  • Hull Material: Wood
  • Engine/Fuel Type: Single diesel
  • YW# 74503-2387882

photo_gallery.gif button_fullspec.gif button_email.gif

Other photos: Photo 1, Photo 2, Photo 3, Photo 4, Photo 5, Photo 6.

{C}

Gaff rigged passenger schooner. 87' on deck, 118' over all. She has been completely rebuilt and refitted over the past 12 years. Complete rig replaced 2 years ago.

The Ada C. Lore is considered a new boat in all respects, cabins and crew quarters are mostly all that remain of the original vessel.

LOD 87'

LOA 118"

Beam 22

Draft 5-6 with board down 11-0

Engine is a Cat 3406 300 hp with only 600 hours, new installation in 2000

Reverse gear 2 1/2:1. All in very good condition

CO2 in engine space

12 volt electrical system, 4 batteries, house and start, genset

Electronics: radar, depth, plotter

Safety equipment

Sails by Nat Wilson, Masts and spars are Douglas fir

Construction: sawn white oak frames, keel, and floor timbers, white oak carvel 2" planking. Galvanized fastened.

Vessel is in very good condition. Currently in US Coast Guard inspection for 49 passengers. Owner anticipates increase to 85 passenger in the future.

THERE ARE ALREADY A LOT OF POSTS HERE SO MY POINT SHOULD BE CLEAR YOU CAN GET A LOT MORE MILAGE WITH OPTIONS THAN YOU CAN WITH ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET.

They could buy things that could be used for commercial purposes with that money and convert it into "crown shipping and travel" intakes if administered properly. Such as running tours and schools while overlapping VIP and security operations.

I'm not saying scap the current plans completely but I am saying that the strategy should be mixed up.

3 challengers VIP should be more than enough if you sacrifice the other 3, then you can buy a lot of helicopters and other operational vehicles.

Just like if you scrap 2/3rds of the f35's or atleast stagger buy ins you can get a lot of other jets so you have options. It not only costs less it allow more performance capacity for the same price or less.

The key is to make sure you have ways to use the equipment so it ain't only VIP transport... it has to serve a purpose, and economic purpose.

Just bear in mind the US has an airforce version of this too... http://en.wikipedia...._reserve_fleets

http://en.wikipedia....ST-86-02543.JPG

I'd also commission a life size rubber ducky top for a good sized ship, just for the awe factor.

I wonder hower how much these things are costing india... http://en.wikipedia....haurya_(missile)

Edited by login

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,921
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheUnrelentingPopulous
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...