M.Dancer Posted March 25, 2011 Report Posted March 25, 2011 How can Quebec seperate from First Nations. One First Nations Leader told the Premier of Quebec, that "if he wants to seperate, go ahead, and head back to France, thats the only way Quebec seperates from First Nations." Quebec is a province of canada, and most of the Treaties are signed with Federal Governments, which Quebec is not. This thread isn't about separation... You want the thread regarding spamming....post there. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Wilber Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 This thread isn't about separation... My thought as well. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
August1991 Posted April 22, 2011 Author Report Posted April 22, 2011 (edited) Would you like to be a little more specific about where his errors lie?Bambino, you see the world as a French notary. You are like the husband of Madame Bovary.August 1991 is one of the Quebecois who gets very, very angry at the notion that Quebec is divisible too, particularly the First Nations aspects. They can wiggle their way past Montreal, but those pesky aboriginals just won't swear loyalty to a new master.Wiggle their way past Montreal?WTF? Edited April 22, 2011 by August1991 Quote
g_bambino Posted April 25, 2011 Report Posted April 25, 2011 Bambino, you see the world as a French notary. Maybe. Maybe not. Could you just answer the question, though? Quote
fellowtraveller Posted April 27, 2011 Report Posted April 27, 2011 Maybe. Maybe not. Could you just answer the question, though? He won't do it. The question of the divisiblity of Quebec is one he just won't answer. Nobody from his camp will, the answer is unpalatable. Quote The government should do something.
g_bambino Posted April 27, 2011 Report Posted April 27, 2011 He won't do it. The question of the divisiblity of Quebec is one he just won't answer. Nobody from his camp will, the answer is unpalatable. It certainly seems that way. Quote
August1991 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Posted April 29, 2011 (edited) Could you just answer the question, though?Bambino, FT posted about First Nations and separatists. What does this have to do with my OP?He won't do it. The question of the divisiblity of Quebec is one he just won't answer. Nobody from his camp will, the answer is unpalatable.For the record (AFAIK), Jack Layton has said that he won't respect the Clarity Act and in his opinion, if a majority of Quebecers vote to secede, then the Quebec government should have the right to make a UDI.---- But gambino and FT, you are really missing the point in my OP. Edited April 29, 2011 by August1991 Quote
g_bambino Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Bambino, FT posted about First Nations and separatists. What does this have to do with my OP? I don't know, but what does it matter? You replied to FT's post, and we replied to that. Just asking you to explain further, is all. I'll take it you don't want to. Quote
Benz Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 But gambino and FT, you are really missing the point in my OP. It's the common frustration a Québécois will always feel as long as Québec won't be sovereign. It's the very same frustration the Québécois are having from the very start until now. Missing the point... really? I think it is done on purpose. It is also why those numbs call this federation a confederation. They understand what they want. It's a choice. Not a bad interpretation. The dynamic will be very different the day they will no longer be our sovereigns. Quote
Shwa Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 It's the common frustration a Québécois will always feel as long as Québec won't be sovereign. It's the very same frustration the Québécois are having from the very start until now. Missing the point... really? I think it is done on purpose. It is also why those numbs call this federation a confederation. They understand what they want. It's a choice. Not a bad interpretation. The dynamic will be very different the day they will no longer be our sovereigns. Quote
jbg Posted May 1, 2011 Report Posted May 1, 2011 He won't do it. The question of the divisiblity of Quebec is one he just won't answer. Nobody from his camp will, the answer is unpalatable. They wouldn't answer that question when Chretien or Dion posed it during 1995 either. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jbg Posted May 1, 2011 Report Posted May 1, 2011 For the record (AFAIK), Jack Layton has said that he won't respect the Clarity Act and in his opinion, if a majority of Quebecers vote to secede, then the Quebec government should have the right to make a UDI.Will anyone address Quebec's viability as an independent country. See this thread for my views on the subject of "countries" with no economies (link). Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
BubberMiley Posted May 1, 2011 Report Posted May 1, 2011 Will anyone address Quebec's viability as an independent country. Why? Nobody's even talking about it anymore. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
jbg Posted May 2, 2011 Report Posted May 2, 2011 Why? Nobody's even talking about it anymore. The post I quoted talked about a "unilateral declaration of independence" also known as "UDI". So August 1991 was. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
August1991 Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 The post I quoted talked about a "unilateral declaration of independence" also known as "UDI". So August 1991 was.And what is the harm in a UDI?After all, the Declaration of Independence, posted on 4 July 1776, was a UDI. No? Quote
TimG Posted July 15, 2011 Report Posted July 15, 2011 After all, the Declaration of Independence, posted on 4 July 1776, was a UDI. No?They spent a few years in armed confict with the British after that. UDIs are never good. Quote
Jack Weber Posted July 15, 2011 Report Posted July 15, 2011 And what is the harm in a UDI? After all, the Declaration of Independence, posted on 4 July 1776, was a UDI. No? For us?? There will be no harm at all... For the traitors that dare make the effort?? How does a forced march at gunpoint from Montreal to Perce Rock...Then forced to swim to St.Pierre and Miquelon...Or a French fishing trawler...Or with the fishes...For the traitors sound??? Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Vineon Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 For us?? There will be no harm at all... For the traitors that dare make the effort?? How does a forced march at gunpoint from Montreal to Perce Rock...Then forced to swim to St.Pierre and Miquelon...Or a French fishing trawler...Or with the fishes...For the traitors sound??? Would do wonders to Canada's "untainted" international image, wouldn't it? I'll gladly make the effort. Do you plan to use the Canadian Army's infantry that's from Québec (isn't it one third of it?) to do so, I'm wondering? I'm sure they'll enjoy having their families and neighbours at gunpoint. Using the army might be the best way to make a secessionist out of every Québécois. You're the kind that gets a really big hard-on holding a gun, aren't you? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.