g_bambino Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 So their digestion didn't work anymore. Nobody said that but you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 Wrong. -------------- Saipan: What's one plus one? Teacher bambino: one plus one equals two. Saipan: What's one plus one? I think you nailed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 I think you nailed it. Wrong answer. Again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 Saipan, what's the right answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Saipan, what's the right answer? One that deals with the issue here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Because the biological processes that sustained their life ceased to function. [sp] As long as there was enough ice to sustain the lush vegetation mammoth were fine. But as the ice receded they were in deep trouble. Enough to simply kill them off one by one - or in groups. I take it they didn't exist before the Ice Age, which sustained their life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 One that deals with the issue here. And what's the answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 (edited) Yes, rather than some politicized pretence to some caricature of the Socratic method, it would be interesting to hear Saipan's views on mammoths and the issue of---well, whatever issue it is he's trying to insinuate. Are you defending Creationism, Saipan? Or is your point in another direction? Edited August 30, 2011 by bloodyminded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 And what's the answer? Good question. What are the scientific experts saying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Good question. What's your answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 it would be interesting to hear Saipan's views on mammoths What's yours? I was just asking a question scientific expert are avoiding to answer. Are you defending Creationism, Saipan? Just asking question? Answered by another question - in the usual ducking fashion I defend no one. Inquiring minds want to now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 I was just asking a question scientific expert are avoiding to answer. Do you have any actual evidence that scientists are deliberately avoiding finding out the various factors that led to mammoth extinction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 (edited) What's yours? I was just asking a question scientific expert are avoiding to answer. And I was just asking what your opinion is on the matter. Just asking question? Answered by another question - in the usual ducking fashion But Saipan, you have been repeatedly and continually "answering" questions by asking another question. More than me or anyone else has done. Why hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself? Edited August 30, 2011 by bloodyminded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Do you have any actual evidence that scientists are deliberately avoiding finding out the various factors that led to mammoth extinction? Did you find that in any of my posts? Btw, what are "the various factors that led to mammoth extinction?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 And I was just asking what your opinion is on the matter. That no one knows. Do you? But Saipan, you have been repeatedly and continually "answering" questions by asking another question. More than me or anyone else has done. You forgot I asked FIRST. Why hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 That no one knows. Do you? As you said: "Answered by another question - in the usual ducking fashion." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Did you find that in any of my posts? The evidence that scientists are avoiding finding the reasons for mammoth extinction? No. The eveidence that you made an assertion that they were? Yes: [A] question scientific expert are avoiding to answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 The evidence that scientists are avoiding finding the reasons for mammoth extinction? No. The eveidence that you made an assertion that they were? Yes: The scientists have some dark truths about mammoths that they simply don't want us to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 As you said: "Answered by another question - in the usual ducking fashion." Yes, answering question by another question is indeed ducking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 The scientists have some dark truths about mammoths that they simply don't want us to know. What makes you think that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 The evidence that scientists are avoiding finding the reasons for mammoth extinction? No. The eveidence that you made an assertion that they were? Yes: So what's the answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 (edited) So what's the answer? Please specify the question. [sp] Edited August 30, 2011 by g_bambino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 Saipan does not want to engage in debate, that much is obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 (edited) Yes, answering question by another question is indeed ducking. Then you should cease answering questions by way of asking another. Like in your very next post: What makes you think that? And in the one after that: So what's the answer? And in more than half of your posts on the previous couple of pages. Edited August 30, 2011 by bloodyminded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted August 30, 2011 Report Share Posted August 30, 2011 As you said: "Answered by another question - in the usual ducking fashion." Exactly. Back to mammoths then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.