Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And where's your evidence that CBC has a leftist bias?

Just guessing, but I'd say the evidence is in the fact it doesn't have a right-wing bias...either.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

And where's your evidence that CBC has a leftist bias?

Heres a simple proof:

The CBC is not as right wing and Fox "News" therefore they are a bunch of rabid foaming at the mouth communists.

Q.E.D.

I bet you would be able to predict intelligence based off of whether of not people believe in a black and white political spectrum.

"You can lead a Conservative to knowledge, but you can't make him think."

Posted

Who's "we"?

You have evidence?

ANY evidence?

I wonder if the misinformation by Beijing will eventually filter down to CBC. As other liberal misinformations do.

Do yourself a favour and read the study posted here. You'll notice no mention of Beijing :rolleyes:

U of M Study

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

And where's your evidence that CBC has a leftist bias?

In 90% of their "reports". Starting from constant attacks on P. Manning, S. Day, S. Harper and even M. Harris........ and all the glory of P.E. Trudeau and Trudeau Jr.

Only the most rabid Leftie can't see it.

Posted (edited)

In 90% of their "reports". Starting from constant attacks on P. Manning, S. Day, S. Harper and even M. Harris........ and all the glory of P.E. Trudeau and Trudeau Jr.

Only the most rabid Leftie can't see it.

I'm asking for evidence, not your assertions backed up by a "90%" figure you plucked out of your own brain.

If you can't provide evidence, you're conceding that you're mistaken.

I appreciate the concession.

Edited by bloodyminded

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

I'm asking for evidence, not your assertions backed up by a "90%" figure you plucked out of your own brain.

If you can't provide evidence, you're conceding that you're mistaken.

I appreciate the concession.

Not to interrupt another pwning of Saipan, but it occurred to me that him watching Fox News or SunTV is not likley going to hurt him one little bit.

Now, back to your regularly scheduled pwning...

:)

Posted

I'm asking for evidence, not your assertions backed up by a "90%" figure you plucked out of your own brain.

If I plucked it out of your brain I would be defending CBC.

And that is the EVIDENCE.

Criticism from the Right and defence from the Left. Can't be any clearer.

Posted

I'm asking for evidence, not your assertions backed up by a "90%" figure you plucked out of your own brain.

If you can't provide evidence, you're conceding that you're mistaken.

I appreciate the concession.

A proof is a proof. What is a proof. A proof is a proof. It's a proof. And when you've proven something that's a good proof.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

A proof is a proof. What is a proof. A proof is a proof. It's a proof. And when you've proven something that's a good proof.

Oh yeah? Prove it!

Oh... you just did. Well... thanks then! :D

Posted

It's really interesting to see the left in such panic because the liberal CBC won't be the only official propaganda in this country.

Posted

Not to interrupt another pwning of Saipan, but it occurred to me that him watching Fox News or SunTV is not likley going to hurt him one little bit.

:)

True. The folks at FOX News actually believe in "GW", just not "AGW."

Saipan's thermometers and grapes are informing him that it doesn't exist at all.

So the FOXes are a little too radical left for his taste. Probably SunTV will be too; they might not even open programming with a stirring rendition of "God Bless America," proving their agenda is ultimately socialist.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted (edited)

If I plucked it out of your brain I would be defending CBC.

And that is the EVIDENCE.

Criticism from the Right and defence from the Left. Can't be any clearer.

No...I haven't been defending CBC; I've been disagreeing that it's a radical left news organ.

You really don't understand the distinction?

If you told me that President Bush was actually a direct descendent of Hitler and inheritor of the man's worldview, I would disagree with you; that does not mean that I like or am "defending" Bush.

The only people around here I see defending the sad state of the news corporations at all are conservatives.

Edited by bloodyminded

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted (edited)

It's really interesting to see the left in such panic because the liberal CBC won't be the only official propaganda in this country.

You haven't been following this thread too well, have you?

Edited by bloodyminded

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

You haven't been following this thread too well, have you?

Yes, 'specially the Will Sun TV News be Good or Bad for Canadian Democracy? :)

Posted

Yes, 'specially the Will Sun TV News be Good or Bad for Canadian Democracy? :)

Context, Saipan. you made your remark after some back and forth with posters who expiliitly said they don't care if Suntv comes to Canada. So that's how anyone would read your remarks--as directed towards people who don't fit your simpelton's paradigm.

You should learn that there's not some entity called "the left" that lives in lockstep agreement.

just like I"m aware that not all right-wingers are like you, using thermometer "science" to determine AGW, and lying and during debates, throwing smoke and being disingenuous all the time.

I'm open-minded, you see.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted (edited)

You should learn that there's not some entity called "the left" that lives in lockstep agreement.

I was addressing those who are defending CBC spin. (freely translated from Czech "if you throw a rock into flock of geese the one you hit will honk")

just like I"m aware that not all right-wingers are like you, using thermometer "science" to determine AGW, and lying and during debates, throwing smoke and being disingenuous all the time.

I couldn't care less how you measure temperature. That's how I do it when it comes to weather. As for climate I judge by the pile of firewood used each winter - or should I say each year, since last year it got to the point we had to use woodstove every month of the year.

Edited by Saipan
Posted

I couldn't care less how you measure temperature. That's how I do it when it comes to weather. As for climate I judge by the pile of firewood used each winter - or should I say each year, since last year it got to the point we had to use woodstove every month of the year.

I noticed the same thing but the funny part is I still burn less than in previous years.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I noticed the same thing but the funny part is I still burn less than in previous years.

Count your blessing you are in the area of "global warm" up :)

Posted

I was addressing those who are defending CBC spin. (freely translated from Czech "if you throw a rock into flock of geese the one you hit will honk")

And in your usual formulation, you refuse to offer evidence.

Because you have zero evidence.

You think it's leftist because you heard it was...so it's true.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

Saipan's thermometers and grapes are informing him that it doesn't exist at all.

Combined with Siberian weather in Europe. And virtually no change in SouthEast Asia. Btw, you can fool gulible people but not the vegetation.

Probably SunTV will be too; they might not even open programming with a stirring rendition of "God Bless America,"

You got it confused with friggin hockey :)

Posted

Combined with Siberian weather in Europe. And virtually no change in SouthEast Asia. Btw, you can fool gulible people but not the vegetation.

NYC just had about 50 cm of "global warming" dropped on the ground yesterday with -5C temperatures and gusts up to 90 kms.
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

what is it with you simpletons? Localized weather and a global warming trend are not the same thing.

Unless you are deaf, dumb and blind you cannot ignore the senses of sight, smell, hearing and feeling.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

what is it with you simpletons? Localized weather and a global warming trend are not the same thing.

Name calling aside [again]. Where's the global warm up?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,897
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...