Alaskan Media Caught Plotting to Smear Republican Candidate

punked · November 1, 2010

They just forgot about it LOL the media really is out of control

CBS is throwing KTVA under the bus

Again misinformation from the Misinformed. CBS can't throw KTVA under the bus because they are not an owned an operated station, KTVA hires their own reports and operates independently from CBS. All this whole thing has shown us is that right winger such as yourself and Shady are misinformed and know nothing.

OH BTW Baitbart posted another lie today. Saying that the DailyKos was asked to be on ABC news with him. That isn't true Kos pointed that out today. Just another lie from a known liar. Keep posting those lies though guys because the ends justifies the means right?

Edited November 1, 2010 by punked

punked · November 1, 2010

The mainstream liberal media seems to be out of control. Apparently Christine O'Donnell;s campaign arranged a 30-minute ad buy with a local Delaware TV station. But they "forgot" to run the ad. I'd say it was just a mix up, but they were contacted, and later on, "forgot" to run the ad a second time. What the hell is going on? :angry:

Nope it looks like the Misinformation gang made up of the typical right wingers are all misinformed again. Do you guys get tired of being wrong about everything Shady? Her and the idiots on her campaign gave the video to the station in time to air, so guess what? It didn't air because it wasn't coded properly. Glad to see you fall for every lie told to you though Shady.

Christine O'Donnell's plan to end her campaign on a televised high note fell flat after her campaign failed to work out the right details with TV station operators in Delaware, the stations told me today.....

No one forgot anything at Channel 28, station operator Tim Qualls told me today. He said the O'Donnell campaign worked out a deal to broadcast the 30-minute spot five times before election day (at a cost of $2,500) but didn't get a Channel 28 staffer the tape of the video "until 11 PM on Saturday night." That wasn't enough time for Qualls and his small staff to encode the video properly for broadcast by 11:30 Sunday or, apparently, 10 AM today.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/tv-stations-christine-odonnells-closing-argument-fail-was-self-inflicted.php?ref=fpb

Edited November 1, 2010 by punked

scribblet · November 1, 2010

Again misinformation from the Misinformed. CBS can't throw KTVA under the bus because they are not an owned an operated station, KTVA hires their own reports and operates independently from CBS. All this whole thing has shown us is that right winger such as yourself and Shady are misinformed and know nothing.

You are out to lunch, KTVA as admitted to the recording, other sites have been posted so get with it.

Shady · November 1, 2010

It didn't air because it wasn't coded properly. Glad to see you fall for every lie told to you though Shady.

Sure punked. Either that or the manager had to visit his wife who is sick. :rolleyes:

Next it'll be the dog ate it.

punked · November 1, 2010

Sure punked. Either that or the manager had to visit his wife who is sick.

Next it'll be the dog ate it.

Yah that must be why the campaign pulled it from the time slots tomorrow more which it will air in instead. No wait it is because they had a contract from how long the station needed to in code the video and Republican handed in the video after the dead line. She can't get out of that contract so now it is being aired a day late because the video came in a day late. Oh makes perfect sense with the actions of the campaign.

See that a simple explanation with a simple answer not crazy talk. If you want to subscribe to the theory that this is media bias and not the fault of a poor campaign run by a poor candidate then you need explain why they haven't pulled the ad and asked for their money back. It makes no sense.

punked · November 1, 2010

You are out to lunch, KTVA as admitted to the recording, other sites have been posted so get with it.

Yes and I have heard the out of context recording. It is the same if I went up to you and said "what kind of things could someone do to get Miller in trouble," and then you said all things on the recording. With out the first part it might seem like you plotting against Miller however you really are indifferent or you want him to win but I only record what you are saying. It appears as if you plotting those things because the conversation IS OUT OF CONTEXT. Here let me show you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXYYHWQ3ev4

Now if you just watched that small clip you might think this lady is a racist. You might call for her firing because of it. It isn't really your fault because it is out of context and some gross sleaze ball who we should never trust cut the video to look that way. The samething could be and probably is happening here. You might check out what aired on KTVA that night it wasn't a smear of Miller it was just coverage of his rally.

scribblet · November 1, 2010

Nice spin, but it's quite clear what was said and intended, there's no getting around in you are in denial. :rolleyes:

http://www.nrsc.org/nrsc-statement-on-cbs-voicemail-regarding-joe-miller

text here

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/10/alaska-senate-race-joe-miller-campaign-roiled-by-errant-voicemail-message-.html

They can also be heard openly discussing concocting the two stories about Miller.

DeSoto says the voicemail message was later authenticated by McDermott himself, who sent a text to the Miller spokesman stating, "D--- iPhone … I left you a long message. I thought I hung up. Sorry."

there's just no getting away from it, read the whole thing again on here in context of course

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/elections/campaigning/vote_fraud/news.php?q=1288625402

Just heard about a nice little ponzi scheme in PA

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news_details/article/28/2010/october/27/residents-cry-foul-over-ballots.html

A trio of Bucks County residents backed by the county Republican committee say they have evidence linking Democratic Congressman Patrick Murphy's campaign to a scheme to flood the county voter registration office with fraudulent applications for absentee ballots.

Edited November 1, 2010 by scribblet

punked · November 1, 2010

Nice spin, but it's quite clear what was said and intended, there's no getting around in you are in denial.

http://www.nrsc.org/nrsc-statement-on-cbs-voicemail-regarding-joe-miller

text here

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/10/alaska-senate-race-joe-miller-campaign-roiled-by-errant-voicemail-message-.html

They can also be heard openly discussing concocting the two stories about Miller.

DeSoto says the voicemail message was later authenticated by McDermott himself, who sent a text to the Miller spokesman stating, "D--- iPhone … I left you a long message. I thought I hung up. Sorry."

there's just no getting away from it, read the whole thing again on here in context of course

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/elections/campaigning/vote_fraud/news.php?q=1288625402

Just heard about a nice little ponzi scheme in PA

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news_details/article/28/2010/october/27/residents-cry-foul-over-ballots.html

Again I never said the message was fake you seem to not be able to read. Which I can understand with all the misinformation coming from you. I said it was half of a conversation and because of that I and you don't know the context. AGAIN WHEN SOMETHING IS OUT OF CONTEXT AS THE CLIP ABOVE it can sure look like something it is not. Now the question is do I take the world of the man who is responsible for the clip above, a know liar, and someone who edits clips to make people say things they didn't or the word of three reporters with out a reputation for this sort of thing. It is clear you go with the known liar because he says what you want to hear, I of course go with the objective thing.

As for you second link you might want to check it out but Republicans do the same thing. SHOCKER! Might be why (and by the way you are misinformed again) the ballots will all be counted election night as this matter was ruled on today. Again accusing with out reason because you are misinformed and know nothing.

http://blogs.mcall.com/penn_ave/2010/11/this-just-in-8000-votes-in-bucks-to-be-countedwednesday.html

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44492.html

Maybe if you read the news you would understand a thing or two instead of looking the fool everytime you post.

Edited November 1, 2010 by punked

Shady · November 1, 2010

AGAIN WHEN SOMETHING IS OUT OF CONTEXT

The phone message isn't out of context. Stop repeating that lie.

punked · November 1, 2010

The phone message isn't out of context. Stop repeating that lie.

When it is half a conversation it is. The message clearly picks up halfway through a conversation. So you have no clue and I have no clue what was said before hand do we? Was it prefaced with "Wonder what Murkowski could do at this rally to make some hay." If that is the case they weren't plotting anything against Miller there were just some journalist who have seen it all before talking about dirty tricks which have been employed in the past and could be again. AGAIN WHAT WAS SAID BEFORE THE MESSAGE SHADY? It is out of context.

I get it Miller hates the media and is trying to shape the narrative remember when he had a reporter taken prisoner at his campaign rally? Doesn't make this clip anything. Maybe that is why after Palin said this on air FOX PUT OUT A STATEMENT saying the network does not stand by it or think it is true. Here are plenty of people who say you are crazy.

Politico's Ben Smith writes, "The transcript does not, in fact, make it terribly clear what they're talking about." In contrast to Palin and Breitbart's claims that the tapes proved a conspiracy on the part of local reporters to fabricate smears about Miller, Politico's Ben Smith reported on KTVA's statement and wrote, "The transcript does not, in fact, make it terribly clear what they're talking about."

Washington Post's Sargent: "t's unclear from the recording precisely what, if anything, was being plotted." In an October 31 blog post, Greg Sargent wrote that "it's unclear from the recording precisely what, if anything, was being plotted."

Hume: KTVA voicemail tape "not utterly conclusive." On the October 31 edition of Special Report, Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume claimed that Miller had handled the situation properly by "soft pedal[ing] it the way he did and say, let people make up their own minds, let them listen to it." Hume claimed that Miller's response "takes us out of the category of his thumping the tub over it and making a big deal out of something that while, it doesn't sound very good, it's not utterly conclusive."

Springer: "We couldn't find ... any obvious bias or hit pieces done by KTVA against Joe Miller." On the October 31 broadcast of America Live, Fox News correspondent Dan Springer reported from Anchorage, AK, on the voicemail. Springer noted KTVA's reponse and further reported:

BTW where is that hit piece from KTVA? Oh it doesn't exist.

Edited November 1, 2010 by punked

scribblet · November 1, 2010

The phone message isn't out of context. Stop repeating that lie.

Exactly, it is not out of context, the whole thing is there to be read, denile is a river in Egypt :lol:

what hit piece ?

Edited November 1, 2010 by scribblet

punked · November 1, 2010

Exactly, it is not out of context, the whole thing is there to be read, denile is a river in Egypt

No it really isn't. Half of a conversation is there. TELL ME WHAT WAS SAID BEFORE. You think these reporters only talk in 30 second clips. If the one sentence the reporters isn't there was edited out then it is really Miller who is lying. Which he has history of. You don't believe me let me quote him in a none out of context statement.

“I lied about accessing all of the computers. I then admitted about accessing the computers, but lied about what I was doing. Finally, I admitted what I did,” Miller wrote in a March 17, 2008, e-mail to Fairbanks North Star Borough Attorney Rene Broker…

“I acknowledge that my access to others’ computers was wrong, participating in the poll was wrong, lying was wrong, and there is absolutely no excuse for any of it,”

So who do I believe an admitted liar or three people who don't have a history of this? Hmmmm. Oh you always go with the Liar I forgot.

Shady · November 1, 2010

When it is half a conversation it is.

The non-hang up message wasn't part of the conversation. It was something seperate, that wasn't suppose to be heard. It wasn't a continuation of the a conversation they were having with the Miller campaign about sex offenders and punching. :rolleyes:

Stop defending bad journalists. You're really hitting the bottom of the barrel.

scribblet · November 1, 2010

methinks punked doth protest too much :rolleyes:

I posted a link where the station admits the conversation existed and the phone wasn't hung up, they just attempt to put a more favourable spin on it.

Edited November 1, 2010 by scribblet

punked · November 1, 2010

The non-hang up message wasn't part of the conversation. It was something seperate, that wasn't suppose to be heard. It wasn't a continuation of the a conversation they were having with the Miller campaign about sex offenders and punching.

Stop defending bad journalists. You're really hitting the bottom of the barrel.

It is clear from the message it is half of a conversation. Again who do I trust a known and admitted liar who has campaign history a history of betting up and detaining journalists, or three journalists who never ever shot that hit piece you accuse them of brain storming? Hmmmm. Oh I got it I go with the liar. No wait that is you I don't got with the lair. The clip is clearly out of context and picks up halfway through a conversation. Could it be what you say yep sure why not, is that likely not really because they never shot a hit piece. Know what is more likely three journalist who have been around a while talking about what could happen to Miller in a hypothetical situation. BTW Fox looked at KTVA's coverage of miller through out the campaign and found it fair and balanced. Shocking.

Springer: "We couldn't find ... any obvious bias or hit pieces done by KTVA against Joe Miller." On the October 31 broadcast of America Live, Fox News correspondent Dan Springer reported from Anchorage, AK, on the voicemail.

punked · November 1, 2010

methinks punked doth protest too much

I posted a link where the station admits the conversation existed and the phone wasn't hung up, they just attempt to put a more favourable spin on it.

I never said otherwise. You are going to find the post where I say otherwise. I say the conversation is out of context. The conversation happened I never said it didn't, the phone wasn't hung up how would you tape off a phone if it was hung up? Maybe learn how to read or something. I am saying the clip is half a conversation and we don't know what was said before hand.

Edited November 1, 2010 by punked

scribblet · November 1, 2010

Maybe you should learn how to read and quit defending a corrupt media

punked · November 1, 2010

Maybe you should learn how to read and quit defending a corrupt media

I read it and have offered expert opinion from Fox, Washington post, politico that this out of context clip could really be anything and that KTVA has been nothing but fair in this race. You have just kept repeating "the news outlet said it was their reporters" over and over again which isn't disputed. What you can't tell me is what they said before the voice recording. Was it "he what way can we shape this campaign and screw Miller" like the self admitted liar Miller says or was it "What could the other two campaigns do tonight to screw Miller" like the reports who have reported fairly through out the race say? Tell me and I will stop saying this is an out of context clip released and back up by two liars.

I have read and the questions isn't answered and because it isn't answered the clip means nothing. I know in your America you are guilty until proven innocent but that isn't what the Constitution says. Sorry.

scribblet · November 1, 2010

==========Sorry.

You should be for defending a corrupt media :rolleyes:

Shady · November 1, 2010

It is clear from the message it is half of a conversation.

It's not half of a conversation. Stop your lying already. It's the beginning of a seperate conversation. The reporters in question weren't talking about finding sex offenders with the Miller campaign. They didn't leave a message asking to talk about sex offenders. They called and left a message on voice mail. Their talks of sex offenders is after they thought they hung up. There was no prior conversation. Simply put, you're a lying liar. Stop defending bad behavior. It's pathetic.

punked · November 1, 2010

You should be for defending a corrupt media

Glad you see the problem with cutting off half of a conversation then claiming it means something.

punked · November 1, 2010

It's not half of a conversation. Stop your lying already. It's the beginning of a seperate conversation. The reporters in question weren't talking about finding sex offenders with the Miller campaign. They didn't leave a message asking to talk about sex offenders. They called and left a message on voice mail. Their talks of sex offenders is after they thought they hung up. There was no prior conversation. Simply put, you're a lying liar. Stop defending bad behavior. It's pathetic.

No one reporter was talking with the Miller campaign while the others were having a conversation. When that reporter finished they didn't hang up the phone and joined in a conversation WHICH WAS ALREADY TAKING PLACE. Thus you get half a conversation. You think three reporters called a campaign on the phone and all left a message in unison inside of rally? How would that even happen? Seriously Shady have you ever used a phone? As the reporters say and as you can here on the phone it is half a conversation.

Who starts, and remember this is from your link to the transcript and you claim the whole conversation is on the tape, a conversation with......

That’s up to you because you're the expert, but that’s what I would do.......

That is the first part of the clip. What is up to them? Why are they deciding on things? How did they get on this topic? So we have two choices here either it is half a clip or these reporters can talk to one another with their minds and if you believe the second on Shady because you clearly do why would they ever have to talk out load?

Again it is half a clip everyone from Fox News to Politico says so. Only a lair would say otherwise.

Oh and the real smoking gun on this one proving you guys are crazy is that there was not story on KTVA about any of this. Why is that you are telling me they plotted in backrooms and never did it? Better get the thought police after them.

Although there is a great story about how crazy Miller is today from the Alaska dispatch so I can see why he thinks everyone is out to get him.

http://www.alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/7342-joe-millers-paranoid-attempt-to-overthrow-the-alaska-republican-party

In interviews Friday with Alaska Dispatch, Miller's former co-workers in the Fairbanks borough's legal department said the Senate candidate was paranoid, acting strangely in the days leading up to the computer polling incident and the state GOP convention in spring 2008, including telling them about plots against his life, computer hijacking, a bug in his office, and requesting that the mayor hire a security detail to protect Miller.

Yah that is the guy I trust over these journalists. Crazy Joe Miller who thinks everyone is out to get him. Happy to see he dragged you two into his crazy though.

Edited November 2, 2010 by punked

Shady · November 2, 2010

No one reporter was talking with the Miller campaign while the others were having a conversation. When that reporter finished they didn't hang up the phone and joined in a conversation WHICH WAS ALREADY TAKING PLACE.

Actually, no reporter at all was talking to the Miller campaign. They left a voice mail. The alleged joined conversation isn't on any recording. So I'm not sure how you expect anyone from the Miller campaign to release it. And those reporters haven't told us what the context was of their conversation. All they keep saying is that it was out of context. Ok, what was the context then? They still haven't told us. Maybe you should be asking them too.

punked · November 2, 2010

Actually, no reporter at all was talking to the Miller campaign. They left a voice mail. The alleged joined conversation isn't on any recording. So I'm not sure how you expect anyone from the Miller campaign to release it. And those reporters haven't told us what the context was of their conversation. All they keep saying is that it was out of context. Ok, what was the context then? They still haven't told us. Maybe you should be asking them too.

Yep got it all three reporters sung in unison as a barber shop quartet into the phone to the Miller campaign. You have never used a phone have you? In a nosy rally it is kinda a one on one thing. You know one reporter talks into it while the other do their own thing. Here it is have a conversation.

KTVA Released a Statement LAST NIGHT WHICH WAS LIKE THE 8TH HERE AND CITED ABOUT WHAT THE CONVERSATION WAS ABOUT. LEARN TO FUCKING READ.

"The perception that this garbled, out of context recording may leave is unfortunate, but to allege that our staff was discussing or planning to create or fabricate stories regarding candidate Miller is absurd. The complete conversation was about what others might be able to do to cause disruption within the Miller campaign, not what KTVA could do."

READ IT AND WEEP! You and crazy paranoid Joe Miller keep showing why Shady can never be trusted.

Edited November 2, 2010 by punked

Shady · November 2, 2010

READ IT AND WEEP! You and crazy paranoid Joe Miller keep showing why Shady can never be trusted.

And as I've already said, their statement makes no sense. They weren't discussing what other people could do, they were discussing what they could do. Learn to read. :lol:

Stop defending bad behavior. It's still pathetic.