Democrat Union Official Admits to Voter Fraud

[Shady]

And he winks at me and he says "doesn't matter." Which meant the machines were already loaded, locked and voted. Vote tallies were added.

Nobody came through, because we weren't a voting location. They came back later on and took the machines. I called the clerk's office. They said just leave well enough alone and I knew that meant be quiet.

I wish I could say that I'm suprised. But the Democrat voting slogan of "vote early, vote often" has been a reality for quite some time. However, I honestly didn't think this crap still went on. It's very disheartening.

[GostHacked]

It's funny that this was brought up when Bush got the second term, and the infamous Florida Recounts, and accusations of voter fraud were simply dismissed as tin foil hat nuttery.

Shady, I've said it before, one day you will realize both sides are playing you for a fool. It's working so far.

It's not A versus B, it's not Dems versus Reps... it's the government versus the people. Has been for decades.

[bush_cheney2004]

...It's not A versus B, it's not Dems versus Reps... it's the government versus the people. Has been for decades.

yep...going back to 1776.

[Shady]

It's funny that this was brought up when Bush got the second term, and the infamous Florida Recounts, and accusations of voter fraud were simply dismissed as tin foil hat nuttery.

Shady, I've said it before, one day you will realize both sides are playing you for a fool. It's working so far.

It's not A versus B, it's not Dems versus Reps... it's the government versus the people. Has been for decades.

That may be the case. But I've never ever heard someone admit to it, in public. Ever.

[Shakeyhands]

That may be the case. But I've never ever heard someone admit to it, in public. Ever.

Nope, you are absolutely correct. The Republican machine did a much better job of it in both 2000 and 2004.

[Shakeyhands]

funny, afgter watching the clip I realized, there is no proof of anything untoward there. So you have one guy that makes a statement, how can it be proven?

Perhaps someone does need some tinfoil GhostHacked.

[punked]

That may be the case. But I've never ever heard someone admit to it, in public. Ever.

That is because you head is in the Sand Shady. In fact not only did someone have evidence but there was even a trail about it. Of course only an idiot would not know that. Michael Connell was the key to this case about vote rigging in Ohio to hand Bush the elections. His plane mysteriously crashed just weeks after the prosecutor in the case asked for protection for Michael because he had been threatened by Karl Rove. You might want to do some research next time or read a fucking book or something. Don't Pretend like the Dems have been saying for years this was happening.

If you want to be the crazy person who keeps on this track I suggest you start with Ohio and Bush but you wont because you are hypocritical liar.

[Shady]

Nope, you are absolutely correct. The Republican machine did a much better job of it in both 2000 and 2004.

I couldn't agree more. Their strategy of having the Democrat in charege of ballots design a confusing butterfly ballot worked really well. Also, their strategy of having Democrats in control of the county keep old and poorly working voting punch card machines was brilliant as well. Yes, those strategies implemented in counties run by Democrats for decades worked far beyond even Republican's wildest dreams.

funny, afgter watching the clip I realized, there is no proof of anything untoward there. So you have one guy that makes a statement, how can it be proven?

Of course nothing happened. He just decided to make up that story, and explain that situation to that group of people, for no reason whatsoever.

Anyways, I'm pretty sure an investigation could uncover whether or not something fraudulent took place. All you'd have to do is add up the vote totals of the legitimate voting stations. If that matches the total certified vote, then there's no story. However, if the vote total exceeds that number (minus overseas ballots etc) then those unaccounted for pre-loaded machines may have actually existed. Either way, he should be explaining to the police, or the FBI why he made up that story. Or what exactly he was trying to say.

[Bugs]

It seems to be already going on, with the early vote ...

Some voters in Boulder City complained on Monday that their ballot had been cast before they went to the polls, raising questions about Clark County's electronic voting machines.

Voter Joyce Ferrara said when they went to vote for Republican Sharron Angle, her Democratic opponent, Sen. Harry Reid's name was already checked.

Ferrara said she wasn't alone in her voting experience. She said her husband and several others voting at the same time all had the same thing happen.

"Something's not right," Ferrara said. "One person that's a fluke. Two, that's strange. But several within a five minute period of time -- that's wrong."

Clark County Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax said there is no voter fraud, although the issues do come up because the touch-screens are sensitive. For that reason, a person may not want to have their fingers linger too long on the screen after they make a selection at any time.

"Especially in a community with elderly citizens (they have) difficulty in (casting their) ballot," Lomax said. "Team leaders said there were complaints (and the) race filled in."

At any time, voters can go back on the screen and review their selections. They are also allowed to make changes and encouraged to double-check their ballot on screen and on paper before it is cast.

Lomax said voters need to have faith in the system.

"This election, I think, more than ever," he said. "The two sides are very fractured and each side is suspicious and we're caught in the middle."

The article can be read at http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/25511115/detail.html

[punked]

It seems to be already going on, with the early vote ...

The article can be read at http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/25511115/detail.html

I agree touch screen voting is stupid.

Edited October 26, 2010 by punked

[Bugs]

I agree touch screen voting is stupid.

It seems to be going on all over the place. This, from North Carolilna:

A Craven County voter says he had a near miss at the polls on Thursday when an electronic voting machine completed his straight-party ticket for the opposite of what he intended.

Sam Laughinghouse of New Bern said he pushed the button to vote Republican in all races, but the voting machine screen displayed a ballot with all Democrats checked. He cleared the screen and tried again with the same result, he said. Then he asked for and received help from election staff.

“They pushed it twice and the same thing happened,” Laughinghouse said. “That was four times in a row. The fifth time they pushed it and the Republicans came up and I voted.”

http://www.newbernsj.com/articles/machine-91656-screen-voter.html

[punked]

It seems to be going on all over the place. This, from North Carolilna:

http://www.newbernsj.com/articles/machine-91656-screen-voter.html

Yeah I get it when a Democrat gets a de-calberated voting machine they figure out how to use it right when a Republican gets one they scream VOTER FRAUD and call a newspaper. The video just showed what is happening.

[Shady]

The video just showed what is happening.

It doesn't show anyone publicly declaring they've participated in voter fraud. Let's try and stay on topic here. The Democrat union official clearly admits to illegal anti-democratic activity. He should have to explain his story to the Police and the FBI.

[punked]

It doesn't show anyone publicly declaring they've participated in voter fraud. Let's try and stay on topic here. The Democrat union official clearly admits to illegal anti-democratic activity. He should have to explain his story to the Police and the FBI.

Hey here is an idea paper ballots. Why was Bush so against those Shady. I think you found someone you should ask about why the system is fucked Shady. Again until you are ready to talk about Ohio in 2004 get out of the thread.

[punked]

Hey everyone guess who that tape is from? It is Baitbart, so we already know Shady is lying. Right Shady? Want me to show you some tape Baitbart already edited to make it sound like someone was saying something? We know it is a lie Shady you need to stop posting these tapes Shady.

I knew there was a reason this wasn't picked up by any media outlet it is because it is an out right lie. It is a doctored edited video tape from James O'Keefe Shady's favorite liar. Remember the guy who posted Doctored tapes which Shady then posted here as fact. Same thing must be happening.

Edited October 26, 2010 by punked

[Shady]

Hey here is an idea paper ballots. Why was Bush so against those Shady. I think you found someone you should ask about why the system is fucked Shady. Again until you are ready to talk about Ohio in 2004 get out of the thread.

This isn't about George Bush. It's about whether something illegally was done in New Jersey, as stated publicly by the Democrat Union official in question. Once again, he needs to explain his story to the Police or the FBI. His behavior is anti-democratic. As for Ohio, I have no idea what you're talking about. And as for this thread, why don't you get out. I created this thread. Go create your own if you don't like it. Fascist.

[punked]

This isn't about George Bush. It's about whether something illegally was done in New Jersey, as stated publicly by the Democrat Union official in question. Once again, he needs to explain his story to the Police or the FBI. His behavior is anti-democratic. As for Ohio, I have no idea what you're talking about. And as for this thread, why don't you get out. I created this thread. Go create your own if you don't like it. Fascist.

No it is about Jame O'Keefe lying and you posting the tapes here as fact. You can stop with posting videos from people we know are liars and passing them off as fact Shady. That is strike three.

[Shady]

No it is about Jame O'Keefe lying and you posting the tapes here as fact. You can stop with posting videos from people we know are liars and passing them off as fact Shady. That is strike three.

All one needs to do is listen to the Democrat Union official/boss. It's all in context, right out in the open to judge. Stop excusing voter fraud. It's unbecoming.

[punked]

All one needs to do is listen to the Democrat Union official/boss. It's all in context, right out in the open to judge. Stop excusing voter fraud. It's unbecoming.

Seeing who it is coming from, I wont put any faith it into it being what it says it is. James O'Keefe is a lair that is already known, he edits tapes, he attributes things to people which have never been said and I for one will not trust one thing put out by him with out it being verified. This will be the 4th or 5th tape you have posted which is a lie just like James O'Keefe Shady you are a liar.

Might explain why he called a press conference after the release of the tapes but didn't show up to it. He has some questions to answer about any tape he puts out now and if he refuses to answer them we can assume it is because it is a lie.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201010250026

Edited October 26, 2010 by punked

[Topaz]

Yes, its both sides and its too bad the people can't do any about it except maybe ask to return to pencil and ballot but then they can always pay someone to work in the polls and miss count. http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/ElectionSatelliteActivity.htm

[Shady]

Might explain why he called a press conference after the release of the tapes but didn't show up to it. He has some questions to answer about any tape he puts out now and if he refuses to answer them we can assume it is because it is a lie.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201010250026

That's fair. He should answer any and all questions. But so should the Democrat Union official/boss, who's publicly speaking about malicious voter fraud. You need to stop defending anti-democratic behavior, and so does Media Matters. I know they're a far-left policy group, but they shouldn't be defending such blatant voter fraud just because it happens to be Democrats responsible. Because we all know what they, and you would be saying if this was a Republican on tape.

Edited October 26, 2010 by Shady

[GostHacked]

funny, afgter watching the clip I realized, there is no proof of anything untoward there. So you have one guy that makes a statement, how can it be proven?

Perhaps someone does need some tinfoil GhostHacked.

I can lend him one of mine I guess. I make extras just for occasions like this. He also gets a membership card, a free lapel pin, and a coupon for 15% discount on a year's subscription to Conspiracy Monthly.

But overall this is a classic 'Shady' post.

[GostHacked]

Because we all know what they, and you would be saying if this was a Republican on tape.

You are absolutely correct. Let's go stomp some heads.

[punked]

That's fair. He should answer any and all questions. But so should the Democrat Union official/boss, who's publicly speaking about malicious voter fraud. You need to stop defending anti-democratic behavior, and so does Media Matters. I know they're a far-left policy group, but they shouldn't be defending such blatant voter fraud just because it happens to be Democrats responsible. Because we all know what they, and you would be saying if this was a Republican on tape.

You are going to have to find me 3-4 videos of them lying right to my face first.

[BubberMiley]

Once again, he needs to explain his story to the Police or the FBI.

Is he being investigated?