Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 When you're losing debate try name calling 1) What "claim" is that? 2) Where is your evidence of 0.1% of population? 3) Are you denying handgun confiscation in UK and all REGISTERED HUNTING pump and semi in Australia? YES OR NO? Btw, as for "need". What is the NEED for fast sports car far exceeding speed limit? Quote
Mr.Canada Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 My only worry is that this is a step in the direction of banning all firearms altogether. As this seems to be the way the anti people do things. They restrict it little by little until it's made illegal. I don't know if that's the long term plan or not. Restrict it for a while until gun owners get used to it then restrict firearms a little more again until they get used to it then a little more and so on. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 http://www.lexrex.com/articles/australia.htm CROCODILE DUNDEE KILLED BY GUN-CONFISCATING POLICE http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/crocodile_dundee.htm Quote
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 (edited) My only worry is that this is a step in the direction of banning all firearms altogether. As this seems to be the way the anti people do things. They restrict it little by little until it's made illegal. I don't know if that's the long term plan or not. Restrict it for a while until gun owners get used to it then restrict firearms a little more again until they get used to it then a little more and so on. Yes, the screw is gradually tightened ever since handgun registration in 1934. Like the frog thrown in hot water will jump out, but warming the water gradually it'll get cooked. [freely translated from Czech] "People get used to anything, even a noose - if it's tightened very slowly". "Nothing in politics happens suddenly, everything is done one small step at a time." - - - - Warran Allmand (Lib.),WTN 1995.(Father of Canada's "Gun Control" Laws,1978. Edited September 30, 2010 by Saipan Quote
M.Dancer Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 When you're losing debate try name calling 1) What "claim" is that? 2) Where is your evidence of 0.1% of population? 3) Are you denying handgun confiscation in UK and all REGISTERED HUNTING pump and semi in Australia? YES OR NO? Btw, as for "need". What is the NEED for fast sports car far exceeding speed limit? http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=16996&view=findpost&p=584463 Can you read? Your brain fart about handguns and crime, if that wasn't a claim, what was it? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=16996&view=findpost&p=584463 Can you read? Your brain fart about handguns and crime, if that wasn't a claim, what was it? I see it's all too much for you. Let's do it one step at a time. 1) Are you denying handgun confiscation in UK and all REGISTERED HUNTING pump and semi in Australia? YES OR NO? Quote
M.Dancer Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 I see it's all too much for you. Let's do it one step at a time. 1) Are you denying handgun confiscation in UK and all REGISTERED HUNTING pump and semi in Australia? YES OR NO? Yes and no. Yes in the UK No in Australia ...but I'm sure you "Know" that already...and more to the point, so what? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 Yes and no. Yes in the UK No in Australia ...but I'm sure you "Know" that already...and more to the point, so what? So why would we register and end up with confisction like Australia? Or worse, UK. Quote
M.Dancer Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 So why would we register and end up with confisction like Australia? Or worse, UK. You mean, why would we in a democratic society obey the laws made by a democratic society? Is that your real question?...or are you the amazing Kreskin and can predict the future? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 You mean, why would we in a democratic society obey the laws made by a democratic society? Is that your real question?...or are you the amazing Kreskin and can predict the future? No, the question was: Why would we register and end up with confisction like Australia? Further, what are liberals so afraid of? Quote
M.Dancer Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 No, the question was: Why would we register and end up with confisction like Australia? Further, what are liberals so afraid of? That is not a question, it is a supposition. How about ....Why would we register and not end up like Australia? Indeed, what are you afraid of that carrying a weapon will make better? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 That is not a question, it is a supposition. Yes, it is a question. What they need the registration for? How about ....Why would we register and not end up like Australia? Would you like some bureaucrat confiscated your car, because of the brand or size of tank, or the colour? Quote
Saipan Posted October 1, 2010 Report Posted October 1, 2010 Let's look at other countries how gun laws work and the homicide rate. For example Jamaica and Mexico with very strict gun laws. Czech Republic with liberal gun laws. And Canada somewhere in between. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate Quote
madmax Posted October 1, 2010 Report Posted October 1, 2010 http://www.canada.com/news/Tories+advance+slightly+after+politically+volatile+week+Poll/3575907/story.html In post 293, I said the NDPs poll numbers would hit a low of 10%. They're not there yet, but you could just see this coming. And the poll suggests the Conservatives are going to lose 20 seats.. Quote
Wild Bill Posted October 1, 2010 Report Posted October 1, 2010 And the poll suggests the Conservatives are going to lose 20 seats.. Where did it say that, Max? Quote "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." -- George Bernard Shaw "There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
Saipan Posted October 1, 2010 Report Posted October 1, 2010 The only poll that actually counts are federal elections. And Reform was consistently gaining seats ever since Preston Manning and his "rump party that would never make it out of Alberta". Quote
Saipan Posted October 2, 2010 Report Posted October 2, 2010 "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning, but without understanding." - - - - Louis D. Brandeis Quote
RNG Posted October 2, 2010 Report Posted October 2, 2010 Let's look at other countries how gun laws work and the homicide rate. For example Jamaica and Mexico with very strict gun laws. Czech Republic with liberal gun laws. And Canada somewhere in between. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate I would suggest that that post is somewhat ingenious in that the police in Mexico and Jamaica are a joke. The law may be there but the enforcement isn`t. Too many dead mayors. Quote The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.
Saipan Posted October 2, 2010 Report Posted October 2, 2010 I would suggest that that post is somewhat ingenious in that the police in Mexico and Jamaica are a joke. The police are what the people are. I.e. it has to do with people, not guns at all. The post is an actual statistic as you can see. Quote
Saipan Posted October 2, 2010 Report Posted October 2, 2010 http://www.jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm Raging Against Self Defense: A Psychiatrist Examines The Anti Gun Mentality By Sarah Thompson, M.D. Quote
Saipan Posted October 2, 2010 Report Posted October 2, 2010 "The Useless Canadian Gun Registry" Quote
normanchateau Posted October 3, 2010 Report Posted October 3, 2010 Let's look at other countries how gun laws work and the homicide rate. For example Jamaica and Mexico with very strict gun laws. Czech Republic with liberal gun laws. And Canada somewhere in between. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate Your link is meaningless in that it provides no information whatsoever about gun laws in those countries. It merely provides homicide rates, not even homicide rates linked to homicide by guns as opposed to other methods. To draw a correlation, you'd need data on homicide by long guns, homicide by handguns, enforcement of gun laws, etc. Even Stephen Harper has made no suggestion to change Canadian restrictions on handguns. Doesn't his argument that criminals don't register long guns also apply to handguns? If so, why isn't he demanding that all Canadians have free access to handguns? Either he doesn't see the inconsistency in his logic or he seriously believes that relaxed access to handguns might increase the homicide rate. Quote
Saipan Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 Your link is meaningless in that it provides no information whatsoever about gun laws in those countries. It merely provides homicide rates, not even homicide rates linked to homicide by guns as opposed to other methods. To draw a correlation, you'd need data on homicide by long guns, homicide by handguns, enforcement of gun laws, etc. Actually it's you who need it. I posted lot more than anyone. Check yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_Czech_Republic "What is missing in the Canadian gun control debate is statistical evidence of whether controls work. Rock acknowledges his department has not done any studies looking at just how the new laws would make Canadian society safer." - - - - Ottawa Citizen, A3, 1 Dec 94. Even Stephen Harper has made no suggestion to change Canadian restrictions on handguns. Doesn't his argument that criminals don't register long guns also apply to handguns? 1) Would you follow Harper in everything he says? 2) Yes, it applies to handguns. So what did the handgun registration accomplish so far? 3) What will long gun registration accomplish - IF it's ever fully implemented in the future? [my bet it it'll die on the vine. Just like after WW II] If so, why isn't he demanding that all Canadians have free access to handguns? He's not demanding everyone has FREE access to any guns. Far from it. It's a Liberal myth. As you may know National Firearm Association suggested several times stricter licencing for everyone using firearms, civilians, police, military, security guards. But Liberals were not too keen on that. That is not useful for any confiscation. Quote
Saipan Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 "The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of these elements make difficult the collection of taxes and dues, and tends to permit uprising. Therefore, the heads of provinces, official agents, and deputies are ordered to collect all the weapons mentioned above and turn them over to the government." Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Shogun 29 August 1558 No wonder Wendy Cukier wants us to follow Japan. Quote
Saipan Posted October 5, 2010 Report Posted October 5, 2010 "The ideal citizen, of a tyrannical state, is the man or woman who bows in silent obedience in exchange for the status of a well cared for herd animal. Thinking people become the tyrant's greatest enemy." - - - - Claire Wolfe Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.