Wilber Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 That is not the point - if you have an "enemy" you do NOT - educate them - inform them or assist them in anyway. Modern war fare consists of this new front called MEDIA..and media will spill the beans..as long as someone is making money war is just fine it seems. I can see it now some bearded Ak guy with a lap top in some cave...checking out troop status on CNN...as for Wikileaks..they might not be spilling the current beans but they are giving some one an over view that can be translated into action..we are fools - If you are going to take someone out in a bar fight - you do not threaten of inform - you hit the bastard over the head with a chair from behind - thus you insure that you win the war..To litigate a war...we make the same mistakes that lawyers and laymen make..we get emotional and sensational and we educate evil people hoping to CHANGE them - You do not change them - you just teach evil people how good people think ---- AND this is an action of empowerment - all power is conducted in secrecy ---WE HAVE A BIG MOUTH. Oleg, you are a wise man after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Oleg, you are a wise man after all. Oleg has has much insight, regardless of his posting style. Not afraid to say things most are simply thinking. The whole things still smells like some inside job, because how does a person who has classified US documents in hand only gets charged for rape, when we know holding those documents is a criminal offense according to the US. So there is no persecution on Assange for the leaked papers... only the rape.. so none of that makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Make up your mind...were "war crimes" committed or not? What action do you want? You can not try a person for a war crime...if all the available judical venues are controlled by those that approve of war crimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Oleg has has much insight, regardless of his posting style. Not afraid to say things most are simply thinking. The whole things still smells like some inside job, because how does a person who has classified US documents in hand only gets charged for rape, when we know holding those documents is a criminal offense according to the US. So there is no persecution on Assange for the leaked papers... only the rape.. so none of that makes sense. Again I ask the question - who was it that approached the alledgedly offended double lovers of Jullian Assange - did the woman step forward to file a complaint by their own free will - or did the investigative authorities approach the woman after finding out about their exisitancew---IF you are going to attack someone or destroy them - you find the weakest point - and it seems that woman are the gate to breach in so far as Julian Assange is concerned - NOW>>> If they found out that Assange was a drug addict that liked to shoot speed balls (combination herione and cocaine) - then he like the renegade comedian Lenny Bruce would be found upside down in a toilet...or the papers would read ASSANGE FOUND DEAD FROM OVER DOZE...BUT it will probably read...Julian Assange is a stud and is straight - He would have faired better if he was gay...I suppose... IF they harm Assange in any manner by the use of a deception...ALL THINKING PEOPLE IN THE WORLD WILL LOSE ALL RESPECT FOR THE SO-CALLED AUTHORITIES....THEN...............THE POWER WILL DRAIN OUT OF THEM LIKE HOT BLOOD ON AN OVER DOZE OF THINNERS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 The whole things still smells like some inside job, because how does a person who has classified US documents in hand only gets charged for rape, when we know holding those documents is a criminal offense according to the US. Because while of course the current administration is going to take the position that Assange is a criminal thats not the position of most countries legal systems. The reality is it would be almost impossible to make charges for wikileaks stick unless he was tried in china, or Iran, or some country without freedom of the press and freedom of speech. At the end of the day hes just a middle man. The group runs a bank of servers that allows some people to upload content anonymously, and some people (members of the press) to download it. Its news outlets around the world that are actually guilty of releasing the information. Its going to be very hard to successfully prosecute this guy for ANYTHING, or he would have been charged already, and bringing this to trial would be very risky because if the government lost like they have in the past, then it would be open season on this kind of activity. Taking down Assange would do nothing to stop this kind of information from being released in the future. The leak-site idea is here to stay and youre going to see more and more sites like that popping up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 "No Rest for the Wikied" - who wrote that ? Sir B ? Well done ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 When people wrote letters on paper - they were secure..now with electronic communications - NOTHING is private - so I guess the conspirators might have to go back to smoke signals in code and paper and pen - Finally the internet is proving to be useful in the creation of a better world - secrets in families serve no healthy purpose - and secrets within nations or between nations have not served humanity well..time for a change - a thing called good faith and honesty - it might just work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 "No Rest for the Wikied" - who wrote that ? Sir B ? Well done ! Not bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.