Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The Japanese have come along way in thier tank design, as seen here with thier latest Type 90 tank.

Looks very similar to the Germany Leo II, and the ARV's got that american look to them.

My linkpubs.globalsecurity.org/

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted

The German panther tank, I think it deserves some mention here, ahead of it's time, once most of the problems were worked out. But it did have a major influence on todays tanks.

My linkwww.achtungpanzer.

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted

The German panther tank, I think it deserves some mention here, ahead of it's time, once most of the problems were worked out. But it did have a major influence on todays tanks.

My linkwww.achtungpanzer.

The Jagdpanther on the previous page is the tank destroyer version of the Panther. Very deadly.

Posted

How about the largest tank ever made.

German Maus tank weighed in at an incrediable 188 tons

My linkwww.vincelewis.net/

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted (edited)

Nice rebuilt Panther G. The D model...used @ Kursk...was a real dog.

Plus an original JS-III...one of the final Russian tanks from WW2. You can easily tell it from JS-II and JS-I tanks by the 'cowcatcher' front armor glacis plate.

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted (edited)

Here's what drives a Panther. The Maybach transmission.

...and the engine.

Defects with early versions of both led to huge problems with them during the Battle of Kursk. Many Panther D models simply broke down on the battlefield...then were pummeled by artillery and Katushyas until destroyed. That or swarmed by Russian infantry.

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted

Russian anti-tank weapons suffered from poor ammunition...though very reliable. A brittle steel was the result of the Soviet hardening process which often shattered on impact with a German tank. German anti-tank ammo on the other hand often came in different types depending on the situation. Tungstun core ammo or tungsten slug with discarding sabot for really hard targets. Plus the usual compliment of solid Krupp steel AP shot...much less brittle than the Russian's. Thus the Russian 76mm cannon used on the early T-34s and KV-1s didn't have nearly the killing power of the German 75mm KwK 42 L/48 cannon used on the Panther.

T-34/76 probably a 1942 model

Posted
Defects with early versions of both led to huge problems with them during the Battle of Kursk. Many Panther D models simply broke down on the battlefield...then were pummeled by artillery and Katushyas until destroyed. That or swarmed by Russian infantry.

A result of trying to rush in new tanks before thier time, It's been mentioned by serveral historians that it was these types of errors that kept germany from producing the numbers needed to keep it's tank fleets in par with it's enemies...Yes they produced a superior product , but lack the numbers to make a difference...They also produced to many model types, each model type had nummerous changes to it, which must have caused a logistical nightmare....This problem is reflected in all thier armour...Panthers, tigers, everything.

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted (edited)

A result of trying to rush in new tanks before thier time, It's been mentioned by serveral historians that it was these types of errors that kept germany from producing the numbers needed to keep it's tank fleets in par with it's enemies...Yes they produced a superior product , but lack the numbers to make a difference...They also produced to many model types, each model type had nummerous changes to it, which must have caused a logistical nightmare....This problem is reflected in all thier armour...Panthers, tigers, everything.

Correct on all counts.

The Elephant was the other classic Kursk disaster. Too big...too few...no MGs. It was however nearly indestructable from the front...the T-34s needing to get behind it much like M4 Shermans had to do out West vs Tigers and Panthers.

A better use of steel was the Nashorn (Rhino) which mounted the same 88mm gun but on a much lighter open-top frame.

(Looks like an Italian Semovente 75/18 in the background)

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted

Flying airliners isn't one of them.

Well, his stupidity merely manifests itself in other ways. For example, his preposterous lack of talent as a lyricist.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...