kimmy Posted October 23, 2009 Author Report Posted October 23, 2009 Well Kwon seemed to be saying it would threaten others lives. The things you list mostly threaten the person doing it's life and I'm pretty sure most safety regulations now wouldn't let people do any of that while wearing a burka anyway. Somebody driving a car while wearing a burqa would be a hazard to other people on the road. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
Guest TrueMetis Posted October 23, 2009 Report Posted October 23, 2009 (edited) Somebody driving a car while wearing a burqa would be a hazard to other people on the road. -k Don't current laws make it illegal to wear something that will hamper your view? I was thinking more about terrorists disguising themselves with burkas... Then we'd have to ban ski masks and a dozen other things. Edited October 23, 2009 by TrueMetis Quote
lictor616 Posted October 24, 2009 Report Posted October 24, 2009 Don't current laws make it illegal to wear something that will hamper your view?Then we'd have to ban ski masks and a dozen other things. no only liberals... Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
Oleg Bach Posted October 24, 2009 Report Posted October 24, 2009 no only liberals... Not liberals, Liars! Don't care if you are left or right - Just tell me the truth. First start by telling yourself the truth. Quote
Thomas Kwon Posted November 1, 2009 Report Posted November 1, 2009 Then we'd have to ban ski masks and a dozen other things. When someone comes in to a convinience store in ski masks and beaner hats wearing a black haed to toe ski suit in middle of july, people will take notice and prepare themselves for what might or might not happen. But when someone comes into a convinience store wearing all black, covering all the body parts except the eyes... the burka.. no one will suspect a robbery (thanks to the liberal brainwashing). Also, it's a lot easier to hide a bomb underneath your burka as compared to underneath a ski mask... Quote
Argus Posted November 2, 2009 Report Posted November 2, 2009 Also, it's a lot easier to hide a bomb underneath your burka as compared to underneath a ski mask... A bomb? You could hide six midgets and a rocket launcher under those things. I understand American soldiers refer to Afghani women as UMOs. (Unidentified Moving Object) Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
jbg Posted November 4, 2009 Report Posted November 4, 2009 The Muslim Canadian Congress contends that the burqa is not required by Islam and is not a religious practice, so not protected by the freedom of religion.It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with sticking their finger in our eyes. Unfortunately the Muslim Canadian Congress here is aping an Egyptian law. I wish this was a trend towards moderation but it does not seem to be one.The Muslim Canadian Congress is the group Tarek Fatah is associated with; he's a Muslim known for speaking out against Sharia law in Ontario, and against restrictive interpretations of Islam in general. Some Muslims pretty much hate the guy, and view him as a traitor... I recall one guy on Rabble saying that he and Irshad Manji are traitors who've figured out that the western press loves Muslims who beat down other Muslims. Tarek Fatah on one occasion made headlines when the RCMP investigated death-threats left on his answering machine by an angry conservative Muslim.Don't get me going on Rabble. I was banned there for being too far to the left.Personally, I think the world needs more Muslims like Fatah and Manji, people who show that modern secular society and Islam aren't incompatible. I just mention all of this because there are a number of Muslim groups in Canada, and I'm not sure how "legit" any of them are when it comes to viewing their comments as representative of the Muslim community as a whole.Definitely more moderate Muslims are needed, even if Fatah isn't one of them. Anyway, as much as I feel the burqa is ridiculous and retarded, I don't personally support a ban on it. I feel that someone should be free to walk around wearing a tent and a bag over her head, just as I feel that someone should be free to walk around wearing a chicken-suit if they so desire. Agreed. But not as RCMP officers. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
DogOnPorch Posted November 4, 2009 Report Posted November 4, 2009 Don't get me going on Rabble. I was banned there for being too far to the left. Yeah...the mods tossed your azz before you could say Jack Robinson. Like you, I'd last about 2-3 posts before the rabb-tards were onto the iconoclast in their midst and got the hangin' rope set-up over yon tree branch. Funny...you'd think they'd welcome a few folks to vent at; but, they seem perfectly alright agreeing with each other on each delicate issue. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.