A New Low

[wulf42]

These Taliban animals have to be killed at all cost's.........no discussion,no debate just absolute wiped out!..............these animals must be proud to do this to little girls! Maybe its time to use bio and nerve agents against them inside their caves.... :angry:

http://thechronicleherald.ca/World/1121654.html

Edited May 14, 2009 by wulf42

[Sir Bandelot]

These Taliban animals have to be killed at all cost's.........no discussion,no debate just absolute wiped out!..............these animals must be proud to do this to little girls! Maybe its time to use bio and nerve agents against them inside their caves.... :angry:

http://thechronicleherald.ca/World/1121654.html

It is horrific. At the very least, post troops and guards in areas that are known to be targeted.

Or is that effort only reserved for pipelines

[M.Dancer]

Or is that effort only reserved for pipelines

Ah yes, The Pipeline.....

In your own words, please tell us about the progress of, The Pipeline.

[wulf42]

I have heard people call them freedon fighters...........what kind of so called freedom fighter gases their own kids................if anybody had any doubt why we fight these maggots it should be gone now, the only policy Nato should follow is find em and kill em.....all of them! and use what ever means is available conventional weapons and non conventional weapons such as (Nerve agents,bio weapons...etc). They don't play by rules we shouldn't either!

[Muddy]

NATO made a great mistake when entering this fray. Martial law should have gone into effect and anyone carrying arms or explosives or other ordinance of war should have been shot post haste.

Now what pipeline are discussing? First I have heard of it. Please elaborate Sir Bandelot

[Sir Bandelot]

use what ever means is available conventional weapons and non conventional weapons such as (Nerve agents,bio weapons...etc). They don't play by rules we shouldn't either!

I disagree. There are probably other ways to deal with it than going to the most savage level. I'm sure if our troops get them in the line of sight they will kill them, with conventional weapons. When they hide amongst the people, or when they ARE the people, it gets tough to kill with impunity as you suggest without killing scores of others, women and children too. What have you gained then... in the process you kill the very same people these animals would kill.

But I don't understand our strategy, if this has been happening several times in the past, why do they not place armed guards at the girls schools? Our troops are on a mission to hunt the Taliban in the lawless areas, but who is responsible for guarding the developed areas?

Wouldn't it make sense to protect development which gives the people a better life, so that they will support the work our troops are doing. Whats it all about, Alfie?

[Sir Bandelot]

NATO made a great mistake when entering this fray. Martial law should have gone into effect and anyone carrying arms or explosives or other ordinance of war should have been shot post haste.

Now what pipeline are discussing? First I have heard of it. Please elaborate Sir Bandelot

The pipeline they want to build so badly, but the gosh darn Taliban keep interfering with their plans.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...21?hub=Specials

"The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline is strongly supported by the U.S. because it would block a competing pipeline from Iran that would bring oil to India and Pakistan. It would also reduce Russia's dominance of the energy sector in Central Asia."

Edited May 14, 2009 by Sir Bandelot

[wulf42]

I disagree. There are probably other ways to deal with it than going to the most savage level. I'm sure if our troops get them in the line of sight they will kill them, with conventional weapons. When they hide amongst the people, or when they ARE the people, it gets tough to kill with impunity as you suggest without killing scores of others, women and children too. What have you gained then... in the process you kill the very same people these animals would kill.

But I don't understand our strategy, if this has been happening several times in the past, why do they not place armed guards at the girls schools? Our troops are on a mission to hunt the Taliban in the lawless areas, but who is responsible for guarding the developed areas?

Wouldn't it make sense to protect development which gives the people a better life, so that they will support the work our troops are doing. Whats it all about, Alfie?

i agree these cowards hide among the population but they also train and have to organize into groups.......it is when they are in these training camps we should strike and strike hard..........they travel in pick up trucks, with all the tech Nato has we should be able to find them easily! We do need to protect civilians better but we also need to hunt them down and kill them in mass! we have have to hurt them so bad it will not be worth it for them to continue! The Nazis were fanatics and were a hell of alot stronger and smarter than these fanatical goat herders and we defeated them, surely we can destroy the Taliban.

[Muddy]

After the surrender of Germany and Japan the victors declared martial law. Thar curtailed future terrorism by the hard liners who did not want to quit. The same should have happened in Iraq and Afganistan.

[Muddy]

Mean while we get off subject by those who find reason to dislike NATO`s mission. Throwing acid in the faces and gasing little girls should not find anything but disgust and anger towards the Taliban no matter ones feelings toward this war.

[wulf42]

Mean while we get off subject by those who find reason to dislike NATO`s mission. Throwing acid in the faces and gasing little girls should not find anything but disgust and anger towards the Taliban no matter ones feelings toward this war.

Exactly..............why the Muslim world doesn't seem to react to this act of horror??? but boy drop a bomb in the wrong place and its death to the west!!

[Sir Bandelot]

Exactly..............why the Muslim world doesn't seem to react to this act of horror??? but boy drop a bomb in the wrong place and its death to the west!!

That is a good point, and I think its because they too are in a war of ideology. Fundamentalists don't really care if someone gets killed, because of "heaven".

[DogOnPorch]

"The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline is strongly supported by the U.S. because it would block a competing pipeline from Iran that would bring oil to India and Pakistan. It would also reduce Russia's dominance of the energy sector in Central Asia."

This is a bad thing...why??

[Sir Bandelot]

This is a bad thing...why??

Its not a bad thing, if you're getting rich off it.

[DogOnPorch]

Its not a bad thing, if you're getting rich off it.

You'd prefer Iran, then?

[Sir Bandelot]

You'd prefer Iran, then?

Whenever did I say that, Joebob?

Are you a fisherman?

Or just trollin...

[Sir Bandelot]

You'd prefer Iran, then?

I prefer, that whatever we do we don't BECOME Iran

[DogOnPorch]

Whenever did I say that, Joebob?

Are you a fisherman?

Or just trollin...

I must have misunderstood you, then, Clem. Seemed like you had something against India getting natural gas or something from 'Western interests'. You're other option was Iran...

It just seemed typically leftardy.

America bad! Let's burn a flag.

[DogOnPorch]

I prefer, that whatever we do we don't BECOME Iran

We'd have to start stoning the women...not the 4:20 type either, eh, Tim Leary?

[Sir Bandelot]

Wait, lemme get my US flag rollies out, and we'll burn a fat one

Edited May 15, 2009 by Sir Bandelot

[Moonlight Graham]

I have heard people call them freedon fighters.......

Our own governments called these people "freedom fighters" in the 1980's during the Soviet invasion. I guess they are only "freedom fighters" when they are killing the people we want them to.

If you want to kill all the Taliban, might as well put a gun to our own heads too. We've done far worse to a far greater number of innocents. But i guess the difference between us and them is "why" we've killed children and why have they? We've done it for oil and military contracts. We win!

What's funny is that your article doesn't even report that any of the girls were killed, only fell sick & taken to hospital. WE WIN! WE WIN!

[myata]

We had to come up with something, anything, after scores of civilians, with women and children, actually died in the recent airstrikes. If only to dispel doubts about who's being the good guy here. Anything is excused, and permitted, as long as you know that you're on the good side.

[Muddy]

The difference is we do not deliberately target women and children. Colateral damage is a terrible thing and one of the failures of war. We have remorse for our mistakes. These bastard Talibans are deliberately targeting little girls who dare to become educated. And they do it proudly.

[myata]

"Deliberately" and "remorse" would certainly make all the difference, for those dead. And of course, we'll be the masters of interpretation, for both. We'll call firing a rocket, dropping a bomb into a building, a village "unfortunate". Say words of remorse. And voila - did you notice the change in the world? The sun is smiling. Birds sing. Liberty advances.

[Muddy]

"Deliberately" and "remorse" would certainly make all the difference, for those dead. And of course, we'll be the masters of interpretation, for both. We'll call firing a rocket, dropping a bomb into a building, a village "unfortunate". Say words of remorse. And voila - did you notice the change in the world? The sun is smiling. Birds sing. Liberty advances.

War is a terrible failure, but when war is prosecuted it is incumbent on civilized nations not to deliberately target civilians. The Taliban are terrorists and deliberately target the innocent to inforce terrorism. If you can`t see the difference you must be blinded by your own prejudice.