Mr.Canada Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 Here's and article in the T.O Star showing Ignatieff going to Charest asking him what he can do to buy Quebec support. Quebec seems to go to the highest bidder. Well the Ignatieff era will more Liberal pandering while ignoring the rest of the country. The butt kissing has begun. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Topaz Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 Here's and article in the T.O Star showing Ignatieff going to Charest asking him what he can do to buy Quebec support. Quebec seems to go to the highest bidder.Well the Ignatieff era will more Liberal pandering while ignoring the rest of the country. The butt kissing has begun. Sorry Mr Canada Jr., the Conservative kiss Quebec's butt thousand time over already. Baird announced in Parliament to shut the Bloc up that Quebec had gotten more money than they asked for!! Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 What - they got more than what they asked for yet ask for more? Looks like it will be never ending - is anyone starting to feel like a cow with sore tits? Quote
Moonbox Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 Everyone wastes money on Quebec. Every party is guilty for it. It sickens me whatever party is doing it. There's a reason the province is a have-not, despite their immense resources and ideally located population..... Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Oleg Bach Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 Everyone wastes money on Quebec. Every party is guilty for it.It sickens me whatever party is doing it. There's a reason the province is a have-not, despite their immense resources and ideally located population..... Look at the first demands of the Block - tons of cash for post secondary Quebec students and univeristies - mean while we have York U shut down. Maybe they are looking forward into the future were French Quebec will be educated and the rest of the nation will not be - that could be a long term power move. Quote
Canadian Blue Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 I can only hope with an additional 30 seats going to Ontario, Alberta, and BC, fewer and fewer politicians will continue this experiment in sado-masochism. Quite frankly Quebec will never separate, not necessarily because they love Canada, but because the province has unfortunately become completely dependent on the rest of Canada economically. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
ThatGuy Posted December 19, 2008 Report Posted December 19, 2008 I can only hope with an additional 30 seats going to Ontario, Alberta, and BC, fewer and fewer politicians will continue this experiment in sado-masochism. Quite frankly Quebec will never separate, not necessarily because they love Canada, but because the province has unfortunately become completely dependent on the rest of Canada economically. It is nice to see a well balanced statement. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted December 20, 2008 Author Report Posted December 20, 2008 Everyone wastes money on Quebec. Every party is guilty for it.It sickens me whatever party is doing it. There's a reason the province is a have-not, despite their immense resources and ideally located population..... Yes but only Harper has the courage to take away it's public funding which would crush them. However the three parties banded together to save the separatists. This is unacceptable. IF they want to separate why should it be financed by the Canadian Taxpayer? Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
jdobbin Posted December 20, 2008 Report Posted December 20, 2008 Yes but only Harper has the courage to take away it's public funding which would crush them. Really? When did that happen? However the three parties banded together to save the separatists. This is unacceptable. IF they want to separate why should it be financed by the Canadian Taxpayer? So you are against western separatists too? Quote
Mr.Canada Posted December 20, 2008 Author Report Posted December 20, 2008 Really? When did that happen?So you are against western separatists too? Yes, really. I'm sure you remember the Fiscal statement made by the Minister. After that the coalition was born because Mr. Harper was going to cut public funding for ALL parties including his own. In fact, the Tories would take the biggest hit. Yes, I'm against all separatists. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
gordiecanuk Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Yes but only Harper has the courage to take away it's public funding which would crush them. However the three parties banded together to save the separatists. This is unacceptable. IF they want to separate why should it be financed by the Canadian Taxpayer? Harper wasn't trying to crush the Bloc...he was trying to crush all his political opposition, so he can finally win a majority and not have to worry about a troublesome opposition so he can follow an ideological agenda....which I'm sure would make the Regressive Religious Right in the country very happy....all 10 or 15% of them. Quote You're welcome to visit my blog: Canadian Soapbox
Mr.Canada Posted December 23, 2008 Author Report Posted December 23, 2008 Harper wasn't trying to crush the Bloc...he was trying to crush all his political opposition, so he can finally win a majority and not have to worry about a troublesome opposition so he can follow an ideological agenda....which I'm sure would make the Regressive Religious Right in the country very happy....all 10 or 15% of them. Ok then, why should tax dollars go toward funding any political parties including the Tories? Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Ok then, why should tax dollars go toward funding any political parties including the Tories? How about that Separatist that Harper Appointed to the Senate. There is no other way for a Separatist to get to the Senate unless the Prime Minister appoints. Kissy Kissy. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted December 23, 2008 Author Report Posted December 23, 2008 That's what I thought. No answer and deflection. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 That's what I thought. No answer and deflection. Its you that are deflecting. My position of political party funding is on record since November the 6th. That is you directing your own thread away from Quebec Butt Kissing as you put it. KISSY KISSY HOW ABOUT THAT PATRONAGE APPOINTMENT FOR THE SEPARTIST? Good Eh Quote
Mr.Canada Posted December 23, 2008 Author Report Posted December 23, 2008 Try to be mature please ad answer the original question or you may refrain from posting in my topic. Thank you for being Canadian, God Bless Canada! Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Try to be mature please ad answer the original question or you may refrain from posting in my topic. Thank you for being Canadian, God Bless Canada! Iggy has his work cut out for him now that Harper has APPOINTED A SEPARTIST TO THE SENATE. Harper has just scored HUGE in the Quebec Butt Kissing Contest. KISSY KISSY. CPC= SEPARTISTS SENATE APPOINTMENT Quote
punked Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Iggy has his work cut out for him now that Harper has APPOINTED A SEPARTIST TO THE SENATE. Harper has just scored HUGE in the Quebec Butt Kissing Contest. KISSY KISSY. CPC= SEPARTISTS SENATE APPOINTMENT No to the rest of Canada he is a Separatist in Quebec he a double crosser who ran for the Reform in 2000. It was just not a great appointment. Quote
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 No to the rest of Canada he is a Separatist in Quebec he a double crosser who ran for the Reform in 2000. It was just not a great appointment. Campaigned for Separation..... But Separtists have ties to the Conservatives so this isn't shocking. Quote
wulf42 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 What need really need to do is tell Quebec "you don't get anymore than the rest of the country if you don 't like it...then get out!! France will have you" Quote
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 What need really need to do is tell Quebec "you don't get anymore than the rest of the country if you don 't like it...then get out!! France will have you" Harpers choice was to give Quebec Separtists a SENATE SEAT. Something a Separtist couldn't receive without his Blessing and Support. Quote
gordiecanuk Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Ok then, why should tax dollars go toward funding any political parties including the Tories? Why should funding be given to political parties? 1) With funding being provided it dimishes the influence of special interests and lobbyists. 2) It opens up the democratic process to those less afluent. Now...you don't have to agree with those points, but those are 2 key reasons. Obviously the Conservatives under Harper don't agree with them...or with providing funding for things like court challenges on Charter Rights issues, or women's groups. Only those with $$$ should be able to participate fully. Quote You're welcome to visit my blog: Canadian Soapbox
M.Dancer Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 2) It opens up the democratic process to those less afluent. How? I don't see it have any effect on the less affluent one way or another. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Why should funding be given to political parties? Because it dimishes the need for parties to actualy engage the general public and to listen to them. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
madmax Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Why should funding be given to political parties? 1) With funding being provided it dimishes the influence of special interests and lobbyists. 2) It opens up the democratic process to those less afluent. Now...you don't have to agree with those points, but those are 2 key reasons. Obviously the Conservatives under Harper don't agree with them...or with providing funding for things like court challenges on Charter Rights issues, or women's groups. Only those with $$$ should be able to participate fully. Read thread and Vote HERE Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.