newbie

Dinosaurs on the Ark? Apparently so: http://www.answersingenesis.org/museum/

A fetus is not human. A convicted murderer is human and could be wrongly convicted. And yet there have been cases where a pregnant woman has been charged with murdering her unborn child (fetus)? One case: http://www.talkleft.com/new_archives/007837.html

Seems to me this so called war on terror has turned into a full blown misadventure. This isn't just about American and coalition troops anymore. Sectarian violence in Iraq is just a nice name for what is really happening - Civil War. http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2006/s1683117.htm

You may be heading there in this forum. With free speech comes responsibility. Do you really think you're contributing to the spirit of debate with your Liberal bashing poetry?

Feel free to rebut the information. Polls indicate most disapprove of Bush's overall job performance as well.

Apparently your own people don't think so. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

Link please?

And let's not forget Saddam's wife and daughter who are on the "most wanted" list.

Actually, it's electoral votes, not population that Kerry would have won if not for voter fraud. We also know that Bush "won" Ohio by 51-48%, but statewide results were not matched by the court-supervised hand count of the 147,400 absentee and provisional ballots in which Kerry received 54.46% of the vote. In Cuyahoga County, Ohio the number of recorded votes was more than 93,000 greater than the number of registered voters. More importantly national exit polls showed Kerry winning in 2004. However, It was only in precincts where there were no paper trails on the voting machines that the exit polls ended up being different from the final count. According to Dr. Steve Freeman, a statistician at the University of Pennsylvania, the odds are 250 million to one that the exit polls were wrong by chance. In fact, where the exit polls disagreed with the computerized outcomes the results always favored Bush - another statistical impossibility. . http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0813-29.htm

Right on. And for those that didn't partake, I hope they had on very large flag lapels and said "God Bless Canada" a lot.

Until you read Argus' posts: the grinch out to steal the celebration of Canada.

Real Canadians don't engage in silly, phony sentiment. They have a quiet dignity which scorns obnoxious flag waving and horn blowing nationalism. We used to say that sort of thing was for the yanks. Well, most folks were busy in communities across this great land celebrating our country. And yes, there were fireworks and some silly phony sentiment as you like to call it. I had a great day with my grandsons, faces painted and all. That's what "real" Canadians do on Canada Day Argus - ought to try it sometime.

How sad, so much anger on our Nation's holiday. Well, at least I'm not afraid to say "I love Canada."

And then there's Gitmo.

Actually Canada Day means little to me as far as tradition goes. Previously since 1985 Canada Day was Dominion Day. Dominion Day used to celebrate the anniversary of the Dominion of Canada when the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick formed under one Dominion under the name of Canada. I like Dominion Day rather than Canada Day as it did reflect our history and did traditionally reflect annually ( July 1st ) Canada's initial formation as a Dominion. Yes, but the liberals have worked to destroy everything about Canada's history - while at the same time doing everything they can to memorialize Quebec's. Canada's flag, it's national anthem and its national holiday were all removed for fear of giving offense to Quebec. It's royal symbols were denigrated and removed, its status as a dominion downplayed and rejected, its history ignored, its traditions dismissed and replaced. In that sense, the very blandness of the term "Canada Day" is symbolic of the whey faced dullards, cretins and venal, self serving fools who have come to represent our elites over the last half century. I see these idiots with their faces painted wrapped in flags, their eyes wide and blank, as victims of two decades of propaganda which have turned a quiet national holiday into an loud, obnoxious, American style exercise in flag-waving and national arrogance. Twenty five years ago such people would have been looked at as though they'd just dropped off the moon. Canadians would have been embarrassed by such crude, American style crowing about a simple holiday. But I guess doing their best to Americanize English Canada was part of the plan to downplay our British heritage. And then, of course, they take up anti-Americanism! How symbolic of the dislike liberals have for our society. God, what a whiner! People like you are the only bane of our Canada Day celebration. People I see are having fun and delighting in this holiday. This is 2006, not 1966. We've had our flag for many years now, our very own flag, our very own charter, and I personally would never live anywhere else.

How about just being bloody glad you live in this country.

Given the terrible intel CIA and others had, which intel are you using to believe this? Why should anyone trust this info after the fact? The 911 commission totally denied any link existed, and any "meetings" Saddam would have had have been exaggerated to the extreme to forge a link and make the administation's case for war. There was no meaningful relationship.

Interesting comments by the big hypocrite himself: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1159 He'll probably just end up with a "stiff" fine. Rimshot?

The authorites detained him. It's news. And I hope he's embarrassed: the King of smear slighted. It's called karma.

And those steps being...???

Why does it matter if the Vietnam Vet is disabled? Actually, why does it matter that it was a Vietnam Vet? The only thing that should matter is what he had to say, which was what exactly? This is a classic example of what Ann Coulter has been rallying against. Liberal human shields.Anyways, on to the bigger issue. When will you people stop posting the same Ann Coulter quotes? These same quotes must have been posted a hundred times in numerous other threads. I'm sick of discussing them, I'm sick of having to waste my time typing out the same defenses. Do us all a favour. Go back, do a little research, write down the replies to previous posts so that we never have to answer for the same quotes again. It's ridiculous. Then don't read them. I'm just pointing out her "ridiculous" and ludicrious statments. She's in the one in the attack mode, not the 911 widows or Vietnam vets. Plus what she says should be bothersome to most of us, but apparently not.

Yeah, like these little jems of hatred: To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."---MSNBC "If you don't hate Clinton and the people who labored to keep him in office, you don't love your country."---George, 7/99 "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity What bothers me more than her verbal diarrhea is that people enjoy and support her negative personal attacks.

Yeah, 'cause when you do she calls you "testy" or claims you're lying (re the Fifth Estate interview). She is pure mean-spirit entertainment for the right, nothing more.

Wow, who better to know this info than a Catholic publication, given that their organization is one of the biggest contributers to homosexual pedophilia.

I guess you missed this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200590,00.html