B. Max

Just like a right winger. Kill the innocent while trying to do the right thing. Not trying, succeeding.

Ever, you know, been there? I wouldn't be caught dead there.

And my view was that the lynch mob is likely to kill someone like a firefighter. You see okay with that though. Just like a liberal, try and save a drug house by putting out the fire.

I'll leave you alone when conservatives leave me alone to smoke pot, leave homosexuals alone to get married and leave women alone to choose what to do with their bodies. Deal? Sounds like you'd be better off in some sodom and gomorrah cesspool like Europe.

More scientists claim kyoto is a farce. http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.ph...global-warming/ Their conclusions with respect to potential policy will more than raise some eyebrows as well as they write “Any attempts to mitigate undesirable climatic changes using restrictive regulations are condemned to failure, because the global natural forces are at least 4–5 orders of magnitude greater than available human controls.” They show that the climatic effects of the Kyoto Protocol would be negligible, leading them to state “Thus, the Kyoto Protocol is a good example of how to achieve the minimum results with the maximum efforts (and sacrifices). Impact of available human controls will be negligible in comparison with the global forces of nature. Thus, the attempts to alter the occurring global climatic changes (and drastic measures prescribed by the Kyoto Protocol) have to be abandoned as meaningless and harmful.”

Why wait for spring, do it now.

He is a graduate of the U of A. He's not a complete backwoods hick. Being said, Morton was a prof for 20 years at the U of C. So maybe education has little to do with hick-ed-ness. Is he Dion or Chretien?? Tough. He's got the quiet, unconfident feeling of Dion with the common-ness of Chretien. As I said before I don't think he'll do any damage. Lets see if he can grow into the job and do the right thing before we burn the capital building down.

name='Black Dog' date='Dec 2 2006, 12:16 AM' post='159763'] Whether it does or doesn't, that's all there is. Except for the ten or eleven billion a year the feds extort from Albertans and then hand over to Quebec. Which Morton plans to go after. Then you won't be any worse off that you are now. Unless you can show that someone is forcing them to live in tents then they choosing to do so. There are camps up there they can live in them. Some business wanted to put up a big camp right in Macmurry but I believe the town turned them down. There is nothing wrong with RCMP. But if we are forced to separate we will want our police force. Ottawa has been saying FU to Alberta for years. It's long past time we turned the tables on them. If it were protected there would be no need.

Then you will be happy to know Morton plans royalty sharing with municipalities. Morton also plans to make access to health care a reality, where Dinning offers what we have now, access to a waiting list. If someone chooses to live in pup tent that is there decision, it's not up to the government to build them a house. The government never built my house. In some respects we already have the beginnings of our own police force with the sherif's that already patrol some highways. Morton would only expand on that. The pension plan is very important. We are pouring money into the CPP and getting little in return. It's not jack ass in any sense . Morton is constitutional expert. I suspect it is well thought as far as any court challenge goes and the court of public opinion as well. Still wrong. "Caught" implies he was, urm, caught. But, as the article says: Time to look up the word "caught." And probably the word "evidence." And, while you've got the ol' dictionary cracked, you might want to flip over to "rumour", the mosey on by to "conjecture". I'd also suggest that you look up the word "gullible", but I bet a man of the world like yourself knows full well that the word "gullible" isn't in no dictionary. You should look up the word duped.

We want Ted Morton. Someone who will defend Alberta, not sell us down the road to Ottawa.

Perhaps I should have said: caught with red hands.

Where to start? The provincial police force/pension plan. Getting into the gay marriage thing even though Alberta has no say in it. His bold "democratic reform" initiatives which are neither bold nor reforms. His reckless devotion to private health care. And so on. Why is a provincial police force a bad idea. Why is an Alberta pension plan a bad idea along with his plan to protect traditional marriage and free speech. Morton's democratic reform ideas are good, as are his health care reforms. Democratic Reform Part of Alberta’s strength comes from the involvement of its people in the decision making processes fundamental to running a Government and a Party. That involvement has been diminished and needs to be opened up. Giving Albertans the chance to initiate important discussions and decisions, and Party members full control of the policy process will benefit us all. A Morton Government will… Establish fixed election dates and term limits Embrace citizen initiative and referendums Create a lobbyist registry Strengthen the powers of the Auditor-General Engage party members in Policy Book development Health Care How much longer will the debate rage? How much longer will people sit on waiting lists, hoping for a solution? Sure, it takes money to make the system work, but it also takes a courageous approach to innovation to explore new ideas and approaches. We can argue, or we can act. A Morton Government will… Supplement existing universal system with private insurance Reduce wait times; allow private clinics to deliver some services Ensure Emergency Room accountability A Morton Government will… Guide and manage Alberta’s full growth potential with our own pension plan and police force and made-in-Alberta immigration priorities Defend non-renewable resource revenues from federal raids Place curbs on harmful judicial activism Protect freedom of speech and religion via Bill 208 for those who support traditional marriage

Dinning caught red handed. His backroom boys are busy going over lists of known liberals and selling them PC memberships. If Dinning isn't a liberal what are his handlers doing with lists of liberals. http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...044e6fb&k=89258

Chavez is a real piece of communist work. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...1804.shtml?s=os

What bad ideas. On the other hand Dinning is just another song and dance man for the federal liberals. Who would sell Albertans down the road to Ottawa at the drop of a hat.

oooh a scary liberal! Oooh! If U vote Dinning then Jean Poutine will totally steel yr guns and make you marry another d00d. and a dingbat to boot.

What nonsense. I remember after the last provincial election some urban leftist from Edmonton on the Rutherford show saying the same type of thing. He was all ready to leave also if the government didn't raid the oil companies with taxes and create government jobs for him and his ilk. A government job doing what, I don't know. Probably didn't matter, they just wanted the money. The guy made it quite clear he wouldn't work for an oil company. The translation is, he had no intentions of working at a real job that creates wealth, he wanted the wealth. On the other hand the cities have done well as a result of the oil boom. Servicing the oil sector with all the materials it needs. The growth in the cities is the proof of that.

Did you put that little ad together by yourself? No I had nothing to do with it. Nor did I have anything to do with Annie get your guns kiss of death. http://www.stephentaylor.ca/archives/000725.html

You better re think that. Dinning is a federal liberal. I will be voting for Morton, and Stelmack as a second. Not that I think Stelmack is all that great, but I see him as doing less damge or perhaps none.

Yes they are, and that is because the royaltiy rates are lower until an oilsands plant has recovered its building costs. After that the royality rate goes up. Well of course the costs are a concern. Each plant has the same building costs. There is nothing in place. Each plant starts from scratch. Just what infrastructure is in place on chuck of land that is covered with bush. They're looking at around three to five billion and three or four years of construction to build a plant depending on its size, before it produces the first barrel of oil.

I was implying I would prefer the gun makers come here rather than the thugs the multi cults have been letting into the country. When the folly of it all can no longer be ignored they try to blame the gun manufactures to deflect the spot light away from themselves.

Tom Brake, the Liberal Democrats spokesman, said: "We see it as far fairer. It taxes car usage, not car ownership." Yes by all means buy one to keep the econmy going but don't dare drive it.

Do you have a real question.

Is there any body else you'd like to let into the country so we can trash some more of our culture. Who am I letting in to the country? I don't know that you personally let any body in, but the government certainly has and you want to blame US gun makers because these foreign thugs run around with guns. I say through the thugs out and entice the US gun makers to set up shop here.

I don't think it's obvious at all. Nor can you compare one country with another, or conventional oil with oil sands. With conventional oil the flow rates of different wells in different countries makes a huge difference. Even in Alberta their are fields that oil companies won't drill in anymore or produce them because it's not worth it. Oil sands have many years of huge capital cost before you produce the first barrel of oil that's why their rate is lower until they recover their start up costs. The ones who started to make the fuss are the pembina institute, a left wing tree huger outfit who wants to stop the oil sands plants. In fact they are the ones who want to shut down all of the boreal forest to mining logging and all oil and gas.