Shakeyhands

Not sure on that, I have an H1 outdoors card (fishing & hunting w/ gun) you used to get a sticker to affix to the back of the card, now you get these big yellow tickets, which I'm told are the same material as the new $100 bill, for each of your licenses. You have to carry them PLUS the outdoors card with you when out. I won't even get going on the new computer system to issue them. Most retailers are giving up on selling licenses because of the hassle. Silly waste of money.

Whoops... sorry. You should see the new system for the outdoors (hunting & fishing) card. It was fine before, but I bet the licenses cost 10X what the old system was. Talk about a waste.

Why not have a little respect for Chas? It's a thankless job that he volunteers to do. Don't post crap and you won/t have a problem. I'd ban you just for starting this thread.

Plus the boater card....

Not enough details to comment, after all... they could be criminals doing the shooting!

ok, I now know we're never going to agree on anything.......... unless that's a loose "likely"?

ONE TRICK!!!!!!!!!

Love the analogy!

I say put us down for some A-10's.... Braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap!

Your assume that all criminals are born that way or that a legal gun owner wouldn't commit a crime? That's a big assumption. Well that would be you becoming a criminal, wouldn't it? I don't see it that way at all, they've said it was a useful tool and I even laid out a couple reasons why it was a good idea too. Ok. Retired. Retired. Retired. Still retired.

My support for rebuilding the LGR is non-existent. My support for the existing LGR is tempered, by cost and usefulness, the first point I made is one that I believe is used by the police, though to be honest i am not sure it is. If that is what we are using it for, and to give the EXTRA EXTRA bit of protection and foresight to the police as they execute their duties... great. The creation was a bit of boondoggle and it cost us too much. Why destroy it now that it is here? I bought a new shotgun just before Christmas and the LGR portion of the purchase took 2 mins max. Whats the big deal? Why is there such reluctance to registering lg's? Unless you are living in the Red Dawn dream, there is really no reason not to. And how anyone thinks it makes hunters/farmers/collectors out to be criminals is beyond me, just register the damn things. If you aren't doing anything wrong who the hell cares?

Yes, because again... we've already paid (through the nose) for it. I think scrapping it is a stupid idea.

Nope, Why spend the money twice?

There is a pretty thorough process in order to possess and purchase firearms already. I still support the registry though because: 1 - In cases of domestic abuse, assault against another member of the general pub or mental issue investigations, the police know there are firearms registered to the person and they can be confiscated while the process plays out and a decision can be made by the courts as to return them or not. 2 - I'm not a crazy person who thinks that the Russians are going to invade and look up what is our equivalent to the ATF Form 4473. 3 - I also think it does no harm, and any extra tool that we can have that forces responsibility on gun owners is good.

You really should educate yourself on Islam before you spout off. You'd be able to make yourself look a lot more intelligent, and less like a crazy person.

Ewww... an 870??? Invest in a real gun.

Really?

Totally different situation Shady, Reagan wrote that as a past President and a private citizen, not as the leader of a political party that had just been elected Leader of the Opposition. And certainly not as his final statement to the Country. LDS I suppose on your part. Keep being classy bud.

and?

What is the purpose of the MEP tool then?

You know that NOTHING happens with anything to do with this Gov't that hasn't been vetted by, at the very, very least, the Ministers office. Let's not forget their little MEP tool, I have no doubt that the PMO knew about the event taking place, if not the stand ins.

Whatever. Mmmmm'k. They're being persecuted right!!!

I'll take a stab. The poster was referring to it being banned from schools, not banned all together which is what you were implying, as you are quoted as saying below: "The idea of banning a book is ridiculous to me." if you weren't implying you would have said: "The idea of banning a book from a school is ridiculous to me."

You're playing silly bugger now. You know full well that banning a book from a certain place is not banning a book all together.

I just reread the letter (thanks for posting the link) and I'm not seeing where you are getting your panties in a wad? Which part (aside from the restoring Canada's name) was so objectionable?