Shakeyhands

Kimmy I can see your ankles.... Silly eh.. echoes of June Rowlands barring The Bare Naked Ladies from playing a New Years show waaaaay back.

be still my heart....

Well now.. let the semantics begin... I do hope that this 'flip flop' further exposes how this administration truley works... http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...ol=968350060724

Glad you did Greg cause it really wasn't the point. I feel the same as Mirror to be sure and I wonder what drives others opinions. I have had this discussion with Kimmy before and there were some good points brought up. However I still don't understand the majority of it. McQueen states above that Ontario drives the federal agenda, but to be honest I really don't see it that way. Ontario contains the greatest numbers of Canadians so.. thoughts?

I keep hearing that people from this province are biased against people from that province and so on, well I call BS with one exception. Before I joined this forum (and I have said this before) I never associated myself with one province or another, I was simply Canadian and never knew there was such animosity against Ontario in particular. I really am unsure, and I know I worded the poll clumsily and tongue in cheek, of why this is? What are your thoughts?

Could be that he's an admitted and unapologetic former terrorist. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What? Can you please provide a link or a book title where I can read more on this? I must admit I have never heard this about Mandela....

Geldof deserves better than being put in with likes of Mandela and Arafat. He's not too bright either. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> IMR, I can uderstand Arafat but please to explain the issue with Mandela? (a little Don & Mike reference for anyone who knows the show... sorry) What is it that Mandela did to earn your condemnation?

Can you really put a dollar amount on this? In terms of terminal diseases and afflications I think the limit should be whatever it takes to keep the person in relative comfort. If we put a specific amount on something like this we are playing corporate healthcare, and to be honest I don't think any of us want anything like that.

Well, the SPIN machine has started in earnest.. Now the claim is that it was the media that told Rove about Plame..... it really is disgusting, my money says that within the next 6 hours every Bush supporter will be towing this latest lie. http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/15/cia...e.ap/index.html

You think BBM? I think he has done a pretty good job so far (fair to midland really I guess) He certainly isn't a Chretien type, more like a Mulroney dare I say it. However having said all that, I think he will be around for quite a while. I certainly wouldn't say that about some of the other party leaders though.

LOL! Yeah, Harper is just like Trudeau...

I do hope it is not a permanent ban, Sweals posts are always a pleasure to read.

Typical I fear... Where are you from Jerry?

'FlipFlop' may have fooled the people south of the border but I don't think it will play here... you may want to stick to 'Ditherer'... it already has momentum that you want.

I find your statement above very interesting... Does the idea of this please you? Perhaps you should join the Bloc? Or am I misreading?

its mostly my fault. I should not have named anyone. Its pretty obvious who the group of people was that I was refering to. My apologies.

what a conservative circle jerk this topic has become... keep posting that link kids... whaaaaaa... slime ball..... whaaaaa...flipflopper (my fav! you're like Faux News Jerry!!!) whaaaa.... crooks Again, for there to be a viable alternate the Conservatives need to start adopting the values that the majority of Canadians do, things like equality and tolerance of different groups, not just the whacko religious types that feel the need to push their beliefs on everyone else. Until then, the Liberals with PM PM at the helm makes the most sense for ALL Canadians. And you should probably give the Sponsorship stuff a rest, until we hear that there was direct involvment by actual Members it will be confined to a few bad apples that have no bearing on the actual Gov't.

I don't recall ever even having discussed this issue with you. As far as I'm concerned you are, to be as polite as I can, a nonentity. Have you ever posted anything of note? Apparently not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ummmm first off, **DELETED.** secondly, the more posts of yours that I read the more I think you may be a close relative of RightWingers or worse. You spew hate around this board continuoulsy. Sorry if I touched a nerve big boy. Carry on with the Hate. The Simpleton Nonentity,

It is a fantastic day! I wish the haters like Argus could relax a little though... this legislation will have absolutely no effect on anyone who isn't gay! Congrats to all that it does affect though!!!!

darned Liberal Discussion board eh BannedHarper!!!!!! Get a grip.

I am agrieved by this epiphany that the erudition of my diction is vexatious to your sensibilities. I deeply regret the (apparently pernicious) super-sufficiency of my rebarbative armamentarium. Please accept my condolences for the insuffiency of your vocabulary. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> wots thet use speakin aboot Sweeel?

my guess is after Mr Harpers assinine comments attempting to tie the seperatists to the SSM issue that this will be what finishes him... what an arse. What is this guy thinking??? Or is he even doing that? http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...72154&t=TS_Home

I find this very interesting. This is a very similar situation as the budget debate, with agreement between the Liberals, NDP and Bloc does that not represent a fair majority of Canadians represented? Limiting debate that amounts to a fillibuster is ok in my books... http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...72154&t=TS_Home

You righties are missing the point... what better way to soften his image than to take in the parade... geesh

This is my favourite paragraph and especially this line.... Wow.