CANADIEN

Obviously, you do not realize that the "immigration is a conspiracy by corporate Canada line" is so incrediby moronic that laughter is the only suitable reply. You might as well come here and state that 1 plus 1 equals 4. Valuing cattle more than people... :angry: :angry: :angry:

:lol:

Actually, I am a Republican. We should have our own Head of State. But even if Monarchy was gone tomorrow, I'd still celebrate this day.

This is merely the usual clueless comedic relief I expect from you. :lol: That's low even by your standard. :angry: :angry: :angry:

And you call yourself a Catholic :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

I was mostly talking about the wait to be allowed in.

And it still violates the fundamental principle of people being able to access and address Parliament in the language of their choice.

In a time of hardship, we should limit the number of immigrants. At any time, who we take should be dictted by our economic needs. BTW, if unskilled labourers came in from Manchaster, and they had no jobs, they would end up in housing projects too. Same here. And guess what, I don't believe for one second that I would have grown up that much differently if that had not been the case. Nor do i believe for one second that my life would be that different now if I wasn't living across the street from a non-white immigrant family and two blocks from a mosque. So what. And last time I checked, if you don't like the government policies, vote against it or form your own party. Bizarre, i still have the same culture, still have the same beliefs, still have the same values. Actually, contact with other cultures have given me a better understand and appreciation of my own. And then we have the mostly white Hell's Angels.... The nature of crime has changed. The incidence of violent crime has not changed significantly. We ought to keep foreign criminals out of the country. Some though will use this as an excuse to keep people out of the country even when they have not committed any crime, because of where they're from. Shame. Language requirements appropriate for the jobs the immigrant is coming here to do, Fluency in English or French as a condition to obtain citizenship. Focus immigration on the economic needs of the country. Basic criteria: you have not committed crimes, you have a skill and knowledge that is needed, there is a reasonable chance there will be a job.. You know enough English or French to do it. You will abide by the laws of this country. Where you're from, the colour of your skin, your personal beliefs, your religion are your own business, and will not be a barrier. With a better system for assessing skills and education. Seven years Plus... No family reunification program. You come with your spouse, and your minor children. You get a spouse, you can bring her. The other family members can visit, then go home after the vacation. Streamlined processes. It should not take years to know if you meet the criteria. Streamlined refugee processes. You come here as a refugee claimant, we'll give you a ankle bracelet, meal voucher for a week, a temporary work permit for six months. We will make sure you have a fair hearing, and possibility for one appeal during that time. You don't meet the criteria to qualify as a refugee, here's the door.

Our connexion to the U.K. is part of the foundations of our country, one of the best on Earth. On this day, let's remember and celebrate it.

The foolishness is to argue that we as human being are unable to move beyond animal instinct. When applied to human beings, "natural selection" is nothing more than a code word for hatred, racism and barbarism. And yes, there is something patently idiotic, that is foolish, in any opinion based on the assumption that skin colour is a measure of intelligence.

The only ironclad fact is that your argument becomes weaker and weaker by the posting.

There have never been any French-speaker in Ottawa. Right.

Here we have the "noble defender of the English language" saying that Quebec's langyage laws are smart, while the "hater of everything English" objects to the violation of the rights of English-speaking Quebecers.

Actually, the capacity to distinguish between fact and fiction is not exclusive to French-Canadians.

Good thing for them, considering who they'd be stuck with as a member.

In other words, something that is only a figment of your imagination.

Stop insulting Anakin

Yawnnnnn...

Never mind the fact that the policy of the Indonesian government from Independence day to fairly recent has been to supress as much as possible any sign of diversity.

That explains why you admire QQQQuenbec's language laws so much that you want to adopt them. Aand after that you claim I hate English-speakers because I call Quebec language laws m*nure. :lol: :lol:

And once again, you are wrong in your assumption that any culture is being destroyed through equality. There is representation, and if you are not happy with your MP, vote for someone else next time or even better, run yourself. That's how representative democracy works. Actually, i was comparing the hysterical clueless reaction of bigots then with yours now. As for your falsecontention that Francophone Canadians have always had the same rights as other Canadians... Ever heard of this? You're free to make a fool of yourself by claiming it did not exist or even better (from a comedic point of view) aaarguing that this gave Ontario's Francophones the same rights.

Yet, you would have Canadians learn a language constructed from scatch, only to lose it down the road. Unless of course t is mandated that government services be offered mostly or exclusively in that language, there is widepread availability of that language on TV, radio, newspapers, the nets, and people use it often enough to actually remember it. The use they found for esperento is what it is good for: learning of esperento makes it easier to learn other languages. Interestingly enough, none of the country you cited as adopted esperento as an actual language of public services. Says a lot. The fact is simple. Building a new language and saying to people: "well, it has nothing to do with who you are, your history, your culture, but hey! thanks to it you will be able to communicate with each other, so from now on you'll have to learn it and use it even though simple logic tells you it makes no sense" is a pie-in-the-sky dream. That's not what they did in Indonesia, that's not what they did in Korea, no matter how you misinterpret the facts. When you have something that makes sense to suggest, please let me know will you?

Unlike you, I KNOW it's about individual Canadians and their rights. Fixed it for you. We have someone from France on this site? :lol: :lol: Of course, being the man of principles that you are, you wil denounce the violation of the rule that has been committed.

We're not talking about a fist fight here. We're talking about a simple logical fact. If it's wrong when the Quebec government does it, it is wrong if other provincial governments do it. Besides, we both know that Quebec's language policies are a little more than an excuse for Leafless. If all of Quebec language laws disappeared Tuesday morning, he'd still argue for the same kind of laws to apply to Ontario, and we both know it.

Since no government in this country is doing that, you have no point. Again. Will you manage to grasp how parliamentary democracy works one day? Interesting, the same type of cr*p was spewed when the U.S. Supreme Court dared to order de-segregation. They were wrong, and so are you.