CANADIEN

For what... not telling non-Whites thhey're only allowed in some areas?

I thought about the possibility I was not the only typonese writer here. And you are right, the "Obama is a racist" thing has been debunked. Don't blame me for insisting that he is.

On the contrary, the MP might get some brownie points for common sense by just laughing at the idea.

And perhaps the Earth is flat. A bad one.

Change mentor then. You change all right. But that's not evolution.

Of course, there are some who will see "Only those who have done something wwrong have to fear this new procedure". Of course, they will be willing to match their actions and their words and voluntarily go to the police and submit their fingerprints.

That's it. Let microchip people, like animals...

I confess. I am clueless about that. And the Loch Ness Monster, Jewish plots for World domination, last year's Maple Leaf Stanley Cup parade... You know, things that actually do not exist. Apt description of your postings. You forget to add hilarious.

If you are talking about my typonese, it's not a trick, it's a bad trait of mine. :lol: Frankly, I have better things to do than spending my time misspelling just for the sake of it.

edited to correct typos You've got my answer, and I won't waste my time repeating it again and again and again. You want to throw a tamper tantrum because I "fall short" of "how does that half Black mongrel dare being the President of the United States instead of a White"? You problem, not mine.

Yeah right. It would sure be news to Northern Ireland readical Protestants that they have the same religious backgroun as the Catholics. Portuguese and Russian cultures, to take two examples, speak very different languages and are different cultures. And of course there is that European culture that gave us Einstein, Spinoza, Freud...

Like I think that would be a perfect world. :lol: :lol: But your statement certainly prove what for you the very presence of non-white is dangerous. And I am still waiting to know what you would do to remove the threat. No surprise, since one is a figment of your deranged imagination.

You know of course that one of definition of the word idocy Merriam-Webster dictionnary is "something notably foolish".

It existed. It was used. In something that had to do with real daily life. And it was adopted before independence as a nationalist symbol against the Dutch colonial power. They chose a language of their country. They did not create one out of thin air. They didn't chose esperanto. And no government, here or elsewhere, would consider the idea of doing something like that worth even thinking about.

And that's what you call equality. Clueless. Still as nonsensical no matter how often you tell it. Coming from you, sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. The difference is, your iiiinsults are merely laughable.

At least, you are not denying the fact that there was no access to French language schools in most provinces outside Quebec until the 1960's, if not later. We've established that Quebec's language laws are m*nure, and that all Canadian parents should send their children to an English and French school, as the choose. You of course do not want that choice to exist except in Quebec. You pot, them kettle. You're prejdiced because you refuse to accept the democratic rights of others. And none og you rights, not a single on, is being violated because Canada has two official languages or because the Government of Ontario provides its services in English and French. Not even that right you hold so dear and exercise so often... the right to make a fool of yourself. I thought I was not a Francophone. Well, not the first time you can't even follow your own nonsense.

I thought I have seen the worse that someone could write in here. You proved me wrong. By far. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Just plain common sense. Esperento has no used in daily life. We are not talking about intellectuals exchanging two or three notions and then translating it the moment they're back home because they know full well virtually nobody uses it in the real world. We are talking about the language to be used to communicate with the government, buy stamps, access employment insurance, get medicial treatment. If we go outside of the government sphere, we talking about the language on cereal boxes, business signs, the one you use when asking for direction. Nobody uses it ffor that purpose, because it has no connection with the real world, where languages are anchored in culture and identity. The "let's adopt esperanto as our common second language" will not work, because it is the first language of virtually nobody.

Too bad for you that this is not my vision at all. But at least, it confirms one thing In your "perfect world", non-whites are not welcomed. Don't stop, mein herr. What else do you have planned?

My point is that racism and bigotry existed then, and it exists now. The bigots, the racists and the other idiots were proven wrong then, and you will be proven wrong.

Feel free to call it sarcasm, or lack of rationality as much as you want. One does not need to look further than the case of esperanto to know that constructed languages do not work. Less than two million people over the plantet, and no country or major international institutions. Nowhere in the world will you find any society where it is commonly used in daily life, or even as a second language. There is a fundamental reason for this, the same why the idea that all we need to do is to find a language "easy to use" and adopt it as the "second language for all" usually does not work - retention of a second language is not function of how "simple" or "easy" it is, but of how much exposure, how much practice one has. You claim you want rationality. It begins with offering ideas that are actually based in reality.

And we come back to "let's create a language out of nnnowhere that nobody has even spoken or written in, that has neither a written litterature or an oral tadition, just because most people do not speak both national languages". Perhaps we should adopt klingon. At least it has been spoken and written somewhere.

This was not about Mayor Miller. It was about you ignoring yet one of the fundamental teeachings of Our Lord and Saviour "I was naked and you clothed me... I was hungry and you fed me... i was a foreigner and you welcoomed me". BTW, landloards in Toronto and everywhere are more than happy to include the tax payment in what they charge their tenants... and the rental unit rate in Toronto is about twice that of condos and houses.

Imagine the parent's audacity. They forget the important rule of Mr. C's Canada. "You must talk like us, dress like us, think like us. More importantly, know your place and stay there". And you wonder why I have lost any illusion I had about you being a racist.

Once again, what should we do lictor? Enlighten us.