Bryan

YOU are the one who (falsely as usual) claimed no one would volunteer.

There's no peg to square, you brought up a different completely unrelated topic, AND projected an answer to that which I also never said.

I've yet to be given the opportunity to cleanse the planet of a monster.

Yes, DNA evidence is the safe guard we have now that we didn't have before. The reason to NOT execute has been removed. If we had the death penalty here, I'd volunteer right away. I'd consider it an honor and a duty to remove these monsters from the planet.

Interesting. I've got no dog in the fight in Ontario, so I've got no reason to defend or attack anyone, I was just going by what I read. I guess I should know better by now than to accept what I read in the mainstream media at face value. I was going by this article: http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/05/01/ontario-budget-2014-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-budget-from-higher-taxes-a-new-pension-plan/ …that stated revenues were down by $1.2 billion. Now that I re-read it though, it seems like it's actually saying revenues were down from what was projected, not what was collected.

Past mistakes are not a good reason to stop doing the right thing. That's why we have more due diligence. That's why death row inmates get a series of appeals. That's why we have DNA evidence. When you have the right guy, all the excuses are gone -- remove the monster from society.

By all means, PLEASE keep it up. It's helping tremendously with both financial and voter support.

1) Killing innocent people is wrong. Executing people who do that is right. 2) Not executing those who murder others cheapens the lives of their victims.

Relate to what? Your nonsense that has nothing to do with what I said?

Yes they are. That's why continuing to harp on those non-issues is going to backfire for the opposition. They've cried "wolf" about five times too many.

Now you're just being ridiculous. People change teams all the time. I know several people who have done so, in both directions.

Don't be so harsh, Justin and Mulcair haven't been THAT bad. They'll take some damage in 2015, but it won't be as bad.

Doesn't relate to my statement or position in anyway, but hey, thanks for the feeble attempt at moving the goal posts -- it's cute.

It sets a very good precedent: if you act like a jackass in parliament, the voters will punish you for it.

A ridiculous stunt that only proves my point. Irrational opposition only interested in gotchas, not interested in taking the governance of the country seriously.

In Manitoba at least, the bars already are expected to take far too much responsibility. They are a legal business selling a legal product. The responsibility for consuming it, and what happens after that, should be entirely on the consumer. It's completely ridiculous to expect the bar staff to be responsible for someone else's actions, and it's offensive that people are so ready to deflect personal responsibility onto someone else.

"Parliament". You mean the opposition wanted the numbers presented that way specifically because they knew they were misleading. It had nothing to do with Parliament needing the information, and everything to do with opposition members trying to pull another fake "gotcha".

The Liberals simply don't understand that increasing taxes hurts the overall economy, thereby reducing the revenue they are going to take in. They keep going in an endless circle of seeing revenues go down, increasing the taxes more, seeing revenues drop even more, rinse and repeat. It's the old saying about the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result. When you explain the problem to them, all you get back is them sticking their fingers in their ears and claiming "trickle down doesn't work". You can even show them how well it is working for the federal government right now, and they still insist "nope, doesn't work".

Now you're starting to understand. "Enforcement" has no part in the policy. The point is, the University is looking for students who already agree with the covenant, and WANT to sign it. The students who go there are doing so specifically because of that charter -- it's the environment that they WANT to study in.

Calling them anti-homosexual is bigotry.

You have not in any way demonstrated that there is any bigotry at TWU. Just because people want to live their lives a certain way, does not mean they expect anyone else to follow it.

The only bigotry I see is coming from those who are casting aspersions on the school. They have a constitutionally protected right to their religion, and that includes living by a moral code, Those who disagree with that code are not being forced to go there, they have many other options. As the courts have already ruled many times, employers do NOT have the right to discriminate against the students based on their religion, or the fact that they chose to get their education in such an environment. Ask the BC teachers how it went for them when they tried not to recognize education degrees from trinity -- religious discrimination is against the law.

You might want to look up the definitions of words before you post them. The execution took longer than planned, that's all. Lockett raped his victims and buried one of them alive -- THAT is torture.

Yeah, so?

If someone does that, kill them too.