naomiglover

In my Goldstone thread title, it was mentioned that both Israel and Hamas committed war crimes. But yeah, side-tracking aside, what is your reason for taking the charge to protect international war laws while justifying the violations of international humanitarian laws and laws of war?

My comments in regards to Israel's violations of international law are not my opinion. These alleged violations have been investigated and confirmed by these organizations. So take those organization's words for it. Then there are the ongoing international law violations, like the settlements and land annexations. So why are you so eager for everyone to pay attention to and follow international water laws, but when it comes to human rights laws and the laws of war, you try to justify the violations?

I don't think you believe that Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Richard Goldstone have ignored violations around the world. So what now? What's your excuse for being all for international water laws but not for international human rights laws?

How come you are all for international waters laws but when it comes to international human rights laws, you're okay with defecating on them?

You are morally and ethically corrupt.

How do you know Hamas will not seize the diapers and create a rocket out of them? Israel needs to defend itself from those who spit sesame seeds out of a straws.

Goldstone Human Rights Watch Amnesty International B'Tselem Those are not Pallywood.

It's a humanitarian convoy.

No food, medicine, shelter for you Gazans! This is what the apologists like Dancer, Dogonporch and American Woman are supporting.

First the carnage in Gaza and now this. When these extremists feel that they can get away with what they did in Gaza, why not this? Since the people killed are not Gazans, perhaps there will be more pressure on governments around the world to respond to what majority of the people around the world feel about Israel's continuous despicable actions. Only morally and ethically corrupt people would make excuses for Israel's actions.

But that sort of thing never happens in New Jersey.

I would vote for Rand Paul, over majority of Democrats and Republicans.

You are confused and don't really know what you're trying to debate. I'm not sure why you're posting links that do not support any of your previous gaffes. Link 1 - Even if it's true (you never know when it comes to Israeli "evidence") that Hamas is giving Islamic Jihad "Russian-made Grad rockets with a range of 16 kilometers, and which were used to target Ashkelon on June 18, 2006.", it doesn't make what you said about Hamas being a proxy of Islamic Jihad true. Link 2 - Just because Iran says it supports the resistance of Hamas and Hezbollah against Israel, it still doesn't make your uneducated comments true. Link 3 - Nobody has said anything about Hezbollah not receiving support from Iran. Much like no one argues that Israel is not receiving about $3 billion a year in financial support for its military from the U.S. This link also does not support the error you made.

You were wrong. Time to stop embarrassing yourself. If you can't admit that you're wrong then the least you can do is do what Dancer does when he realizes that he's been caught making a false claim; just go away and pretend it didn't happen. Hezbollah are not a middle man for Hamas.

You are a hateful racist bigot. I feel sorry for you and your family.

Uhm. I'm not going to hold my breath for you to admit that you're wrong. I'll just let you battle it out with yourself. Maybe in your own head you'll accept that because you can put together a few phrases like "islamofascist, islamic jihad, proxy", it does not mean that you have any idea what you're talking about. Me: You: You (a couple of days before):

Your own post indicates that you are wrong and I am correct. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=16055&view=findpost&p=541587

As you can see above, this news piece is not only in the Guardian. This is not the first time you've come out with a post that displays your lack of understanding of anything. Didn't you claim Hamas is a proxy of Islamic Jihad?

Costello was scheduled to perform on June 30 and July 1 in the amphitheatre in Caesarea. Tickets for his first show were sold out, and many have been sold for the second one. http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3891133,00.html Do you always attack people that criticize Israeli policy? I guess you're not trying to put down an achieved person like Justice Richard Goldstone.. oh. wait. Okay, okay. I guess you're not trying to put down a person like Gandhi.. oh. wait.

As of when did standing up for human rights and international law become Jew-baiting? Why are you so against following international and humanitarian laws?

The hatred is for the Israeli policy towards the Palestinians which has resulted in violations of international and humanitarian laws. You may be okay with breaking international and humanitarian laws, but I'm not.

Not responding does not change reality that you have said the following people are wrong and you and your link are right: Peter Spiro, law professor at Temple University Kevin Johnson, dean of the law school at the University of California-Davis Laura A. Hernandez, law professor at Baylor University Judith Gans, program manager for immigration policy at the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy at the University of Arizona Stephen W. Yale-Loehr, adjunct law professor at Cornell University Gabriel (Jack) Chin, University of Arizona law professor Jennifer Chacon, law professor at the University of California (Irvine) In discussing these questions with legal experts, we found that everyone agreed that there's some gray area that will need to be sorted out in future court decisions. That said, the general consensus was that police could indeed stop someone even in the absence of suspicion that a crime was being committed. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/apr/28/john-huppenthal/arizona-immigration-law-requires-police-see-crime-/

What about the millions of dollars that goes from AIPAC to American politicians? Does that suggest an agenda as well?

Haha sharkman. I really did laugh out loud.

Did you start boycotting Costello and Santana as well?