lictor616

actually Rome fell because of the nationalization of hundreds of thousands of north africans... or at lest the downfall followed the same time frame....

along with an allegiance with the forces of communism in the second world war...

that's actually closer to national syndicalism, or Italian Fascism

Northern French Britanny, is Celtic in origin... that you are English Norther French Irish is like saying, youre a mix of celtic and celtic and gealic. And race loyalty is a biological imperative... even animals have it, two different species of tigers (bengal and siberian) will fight to the death if competing on the same territory. The "in vs out" mentality is a survival trait that originated in millenias of human evolution, and millions of years of biological evolution before that. Studies on children and face recognition all concede that babies have a harder time trusting or indeed recognizing a face from a different race: http://www.newsweek.com/2009/09/04/see-baby-discriminate.html What you're saying is this: It’s horrifying to imagine kids being “proud to be white.” It’s horrifying to think that many white people will continue to subscribe to Newsweek even after they publish anti-white hatred like this. After the two-week history class, the children were surveyed on their racial attitudes. White children who got the full story about historical discrimination had significantly better attitudes toward blacks than those who got the neutered version. Explicitness works. “It also made them feel some guilt,” Bigler adds. “It knocked down their glorified view of white people.” They couldn’t justify in-group superiority. The reality is that racial blindness and poltiical correcntess IS THE LEARNED BEHAVIOUR... it is a product of the classrooms, I still remeber taking morality classes all through primary and secondary, every single class had components teaching us how we're all the same and that blacks are victims of white racism even today etc... I actually used to believe this myself until the gap between observable reality and my learned political correctness became intolerably too great. yes bloodyminded! Yes, you’ve got to teach white kids to be guilty as early as possible. Another excellent reason to home school your kids, and keep them away from the “professionals”. You’d better not tell the kids about Volta, Franklin, Faraday, Maxwell, Tesla, Galileo, Newton, Gauss, Planck, Bohr, Einstein, Schroedinger, Heisenberg, Darwin, Watson, Crick, etc., etc. because each of those men did things far more important than hit a ball with a bat and they’re all white. We wouldn’t want those white kids getting any sense of pride about the accomplishments of their people. no of course not!

again biometric studies carried out over a period of 40 years corroborate this. and centuries before that craniometry and similar studies also Furthermore, evidence of different mental aptitudes are obvious looking at the countries from which certain clines or races sprang. The Congo is pretty much a non-state, with all the technological knowhow of a stone age culture, and a chaos that is as complete as any known in the primitive world..., while Japan shows a different level of statecraft. To explain away such monumental differences, one must look at the PEOPLE who built such vastly different cultures.

exactly right,

unfortunately the overwhelming majority of these are european or Asian...

Chomsky isn`t crazy, while I agree with some of his anarchist leanings (namely the goal of creating a society completely free from government regimentation) I doubt that his socialist leanings are the way from here to there. ANd sometimes you do see him get all glassy eyed about world peace and McCarthyism (even if McCarthy was largely correct)... He is BY FAR the most honest (perhaps the only honest) speaker left of center... He is owed credit... no matter where you are on the political spectrum...

oh please shut up, look at you dicing the future of tens of thousands of children to prop up your failed ideology! you should be ashamed of yourself..

using the term "creature" makes me a sub human... fair enough, i'll be more careful in the future...

Noam Chomsky is beloved by many to the right, the supremely erudite Professor Revilo Pendleton Oliver, once wrote this about him in the 80's, http://www.revilo-oliver.com/rpo/chomsky.htm Doctor William luther Pierce, leader of the National Alliance (a hard right organization) promoted his books on many issues concerning propaganda and Israel, he spoke well of him and cited him often... Chomsky after all is one of the most honest academics alive today, he isn't perfect, he gets a bit kooky at times, but he encourages debate with anyone and opposes censorship. The only groups that I could see hating him, are Zionist... or maybe crazed evangelical christians... (who are more left wing authoritarian then right) I happen to think that Chomsky`s real value is as a professor in Linguistics, but even I cannot bring myself to feel any antipathy towards the man despite my comparatively right wing leanings.

israelo palestinian conflict... proof that diversity is a strength! right guys!!? oh right what do I know I'm just a vile fascist...

ahahhha! what a joke, I got left of center authoritarian, while I didnt select any strongly agree option for ANY question pertaining to government power! and this is clearly a biased source, they place the BNP in exactly the same square as HItler's national socialist, and even bother writing such barefaced biased nonsense such as: "British National Party as "extreme right". The truth is that on issues like health, transport, housing, protectionism and globalisation, their economics are left of Labour, let alone the Conservatives. It's in areas like police power, military power, school discipline, law and order, race and nationalism that the BNP's real extremism - as authoritarians - is clear. It's easy to see how the term national socialism came into being. The uncomfortable reality is that much of their support comes from former Labour voters." uncomfortable?!? but communist groups are all A-OK... ! of course junk this!

the pyramids in terms of engineering marvels far... far FAR exceed that heap of garbage that is in ZImbabwe, the fact that the pyramids are still standing after 5000+ years is far more a feat then a mere 500... i mean really are you serious to compare the Structures of Ancient Egypt to this? 500 years ago, the sistine chapel was being built... how does that compare to a stack of half collapsed rocks?!?! puhlease this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zimbabwe_wall.jpg equal to this?!!! http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p259/j_locknload/Collection/Egypt/Giza_Sphinx_Kheops.jpg http://www.machine-herodote.com/uploads/images/550px/kh%C3%A9ops%20r%C3%A9duite%20550%20copie.jpg what is wrong with you? loool!!

I`d really appreciate you bringing up specifically what I said that was disgusting to you, the fact that I like traits such as light colored eyes, fair skin, light hair? really what did I say that makes me such an ogre in your eyes?

rolfcopter

you need only to look at beauty competitions in Estonia to see... and also such recording artists as kerli http://freshnerd.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/853.jpg http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/13483147/Kerli.jpg such breathtaking "Finno-Ugric" traits... its almost painful to look at... WOW!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU9W7Qo1T6M&feature=player_embedded#! notice the black Jamaican rooster... lol

I think you missed his sarcasm... lol this heap of rocks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zimbabwe_wall.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zimbabwe_wall.jpg as impressive as the GIzeh Pyramids!!?! lolsies!

neither situation is ideal of course. and I would not approve of one or the other. (despite how unlikely this scenario would be if we are to look at the average social status of blacks vs white) I like the way I look, in fact I like the way "my people look"... and I don't understand why you think it should be illegal for me to frankly state my preference to my daughter that my traits, and my ancestors traits be carried forward. Without this, no blond hair, no green eyes, no fair skin, if my hypothetical daughter looked like heidi klum and married someone like Seal for instance: my grandkid would look this ugschmo baby on the left you see here: http://lh4.ggpht.com/_ZZ-CqtHjAnk/R_F51np8s5I/AAAAAAAAMU4/LLDSfzIAjlw/HEIDI+KLUM+WITH+CHILDREN+KIDS.jpg an aberration, between the creature on the left and the child on the right... i,d much rather have the white child on the right. Because by doing this: MILLENNIAS of biological evolution that began in Europe would continue.,.. I have no inclination to make that stop for the sake of PC platitudes. as I said I see nothing wrong with the way white people look, I see nothing wrong with my traits or that of my "race"... why would I have a reason to want to efface them? I don't understand why this would be a moral thing to do for me... Why would I want my daughter to appear as if she was babysitting for some black couple`s baby? Does heidi`s black baby look ANYTHING like her? no! it might as well be adopted! Why would I want a brown dot in my family pictures... an embarrassing question mark? If my daughter is too pig headed to understand that she would be cutting herself away from her roots, and opting for what amounts to a evolutionary dead end or suicide, then id rather she stay childless. What kind of mother could tolerate bearing children who will look nothing like her? What a sick scenario! no no, there's nothing WRONG with the way WE (whites) look, only WE CAN BE US, and NOBODY ELSE CAN BE US. I have no desire to efface our identity, in fact, i`d like us to stick around for a few more decades. To me, my race is my nation in a way. Race is more primitive, more deeply seated in men, it is all encompassing, it is a uniform, much more immediate then language, much more meaningful then nationality. Its in our GENES. IT IS OUR GENES. Its who we are. It is the link with thousands of generations of evolution that originated in our northlands. The instinct of Racial loyalty lies deep in men. And though it may be crushed over with sophistic blabber, although it may seem to have disappeared under the powder of words sprinkled over it, it remains dormant in the flesh, dormant in the soul. Beyond that, the child would in a way signify the self hatred she harbors in her own being, why select black over white? its as if she would renounce her own biology. Its unhealthy and unnatural.

WHY IS IT GOOD? answer please! ANd how is it inevitable... if even with desperate attempts from the govermedia has still not made the number of interracial marriage increase substantially!? you would have a point if the media and government were not busily engaged in the PROMOTION of this... if it were natural.. there`d be no need for it! and please show us how nature programmed whites for instance to prefer "exotics" (whatever the hell that means) over people of the same race? actually the opposite is true: nature made us to prefer our own clines SINCE of course geographical contiguity would have made it impossible for widely different races to interact for 99.999999% of our evolution... but please show me the science behind why scottish redheaded males for instance prefer congo pygmies.... i`d love to see this

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2663638 @Rose Lee, the city’s co-ordinator of diversity management, says one in every two Torontonians speaks a language other than English or French. The city does not see this linguistic challenge as a burden, she says, but rather as an opportunity. “We see racial minorities as a potential talent pool, and we have to tap into that talent pool,” says Ms. Lee. “We have policies in place to provide the best quality of life for all residents regardless of background and to foster a sense of identity.” In practical terms, what that means is multiple translations. The city’s Multilingual Services division processed 1,629 translations in 41 languages in 2007. In 2008, the division processed 1,716 translations in 40 languages. This could offer a glimpse of the future for Canada. According to projections by Statistics Canada, Canada’s population will become increasingly diverse by 2031, with nearly half of Canadians aged 15 and over either foreign born or with at least one foreign-born parent (up to 46% from 39% in 2006.) About 55% of this foreign-born population would be born in Asia. Under the range of growth scenarios predicted by the statisticians, between 11.4 million and 14.4 million people could belong to visible minority groups by 20131, more than double the 5.3 million visible minorities in 2006. The projections also suggest that more than three-quarters of the population will have a mother tongue that is neither French nor English—a further challenge to the country’s official languages policies, which funds those languages at the expense of multilingual needs. Immigrant children learn one of the country’s two official languages relatively easily as children, says Henry Yu, an associate history professor at the University of British Columbia, but then they’re effectively rendered monolingual by years of English- or French-only schooling and the encouragement to leave their mother tongue behind. Ms. Rose said the city’s multilingual services are a model for other jurisdictions. “We have delegations coming every year from different parts of Canada and all over the world,” to see how the city grapples with its multicultural face, she said. But the path to that laudable goal is not without its challenges. A “Google Translate” button on the City of Toronto web site allows users to translate city information into 51 languages. This mechanical translation can, however, be imprecise. For example, Google translated the English phrase, “Feel at home,” into French as “N’hesitez pas à la maison” which means, roughly, “Don’t stay home.” A comments section on the city’s web site includes this complaint: “Toronto being the multicultural city, I am surprised to see that among 51 languages Bengali was one of the languages not provided in the website as an option. I know many immigrants from Bangladesh who come and find themselves isolated in the Toronto website, so adding Bengali language option would be of a great help.” Another user writes, “Why not in Tamil language? You are providing services for very less population than Tamils but not in Tamil where as more than 300,000 Tamils live in Toronto.” Toronto has not measured satisfaction with its translation efforts, but Ms. Lee suggested that more recent immigrants may have less need for translation. “More than half the immigrants arriving in the City of Toronto are foreign-trained professionals,” she said. “They bring with them language skills.”" wait a minute?!???!: "The city does not see this linguistic challenge as a burden, she says, but rather as an opportunity." (LOL!) Does Tonronto remember the two Quebec referendums for sovereignty? you’d think they’d realize that linguistic diversity does not unify a country but leave it to near-do-well liberals! I have a better solution… insist that immigrants to Canada learn and become proficient in either English or French, depending on where they settle. Whoops, sorry, that’s racist, isn’t it? We can’t possibly demand anything FROM third-world immigrants, can we?

do you agree with this statement?: "There is no such thing as “reverse” racism. Racism is racism, period. To call anti-White discrimination “reverse” racism is to subtly imply that only discrimination against non-Whites is real racism. Which, of course, is precisely what the governmedia want us to believe."

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/ "Despite the refusal of the Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, to release any DNA results which might indicate the racial ancestry of Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the leaked results reveal that King Tut’s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y chromosomes. The DNA test results were inadvertently revealed on a Discovery Channel TV documentary filmed with Hawass’s permission—but it seems as if the Egyptian failed to spot the giveaway part of the documentary which revealed the test results. Hawass previously announced that he would not release the racial DNA results of Egyptian mummies—obviously because he feared the consequences of such a revelation. On the Discovery Channel broadcast, which can be seen on the Discovery Channel website here.here, or if they pull it, on YouTube here.here, at approximately 1:53 into the video, the camera pans over a printout of DNA test results from King Tut. Firstly, here is a brief explanation of the results visible in the video. It is a list of what is called Short Tandem Repeats (STRs). STRs are repeated DNA sequences which are “short repeat units” whose characteristics make them especially suitable for human identification. These STR values for 17 markers visible in the video are as follows: DYS 19—14 (? not clear) DYS 385a—11 DYS 385b—14 DYS 389i—13 DYS 389ii—30 DYS 390—24 DYS 391—11 DYS 392—13 DYS 393—13 DYS 437—14 (? not clear) DYS 438—12 DYS 439—10 DYS 448—19 DYS 456—15 DYS 458—16 DYS 635—23 YGATAH4—11 What does this mean? Fortunately, a genius by the name of Whit Athey provides the key to this list. Mr Athey is a retired physicist whose working career was primarily at the Food and Drug Administration where he was chief of one of the medical device labs."

If the American Indian nations are not sovereign nations, they certainly ought to be. The principles of nationhood and sovereignty must begin somewhere. Let the American Indian show Whites the true meaning of nation-states! They have retained what most Whites have sadly lost — a strong and abiding sense of ethnic-national identity.