lictor616

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/12/death-threats-rattle-everybody-draw-muhammad-day-advocate/ "The creator of a now-defunct “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” page on Facebook fears she may be targeted for death now that the cartoonist who launched the online campaign has been placed on an execution list by a radical Yemeni-American cleric. The 27-year-old Facebook page creator—a Canadian woman who asked not to be identified due to fears of reprisal—told FoxNews.com that she was visited at her home last week by Royal Canadian Mounted Police officials who advised her to remove her page and not to talk to reporters. {snip} The woman created her version of “Everybody Draw Muhammad” in late April, days after a Seattle cartoonist launched the online campaign to protest Comedy Central’s censoring of an episode of “South Park,” in which the Prophet Muhammad was depicted wearing a bear costume. The Canadian woman said she will no longer act as the administrator of such a page." so much for the apogee of liberal resistance! hey so where are all the liberals who assured us that Muslim extremism was under control thanks to this? I remember participating in a thread on this topic 3 months ago..

The Department of Homeland Security currently is auditing employment records of many companies suspected of hiring undocumented workers. Yet in an emerging paradox for businesses, the Justice Department and other agencies have stepped up probes of employers—including restaurant groups, factories and retailers—for allegedly violating anti-discrimination laws by demanding too many identity documents from applicants who aren’t U.S. citizens. To fend off lawsuits or enforcement actions, several companies have recently reached out-of-court settlements with the government; in some instances they paid fines. “The message is: Employers beware. You need to worry just as much about asking for too many immigration documents as you do about not asking for enough,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration-law scholar at Cornell University. {snip} Anti-discrimination protections in the INA, meanwhile, guarantee “all individuals authorized to work in the U.S. have the right to seek employment without the added burden of special rules or document demands based on their citizenship status or national origin,” said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights. He said his unit is prioritizing enforcement of the INA provisions. “The monkey is on the back of employers to make the call,” said Mary Pivec, a Washington, D.C., attorney who is defending several companies with immigration-related problems. {snip} By the end of 2010, the Justice Department will have boosted by 25% the total number of attorneys and investigators in its Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-related Unfair Employment Practices. {snip}

well I'm going to go out on a limb and presume im not the only one who noticed it.... either way, please stay on topic

http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/07/how_diversity_punishes_asians.html Poor Non-White Students: “Counting Twice” {snip} Private institutions, Espenshade and Radford suggest, “intentionally save their scarce financial aid dollars for students who will help them look good on their numbers of minority students.” Quoting a study by NYU researcher Mitchell Stevens, they write: “ultimate evaluative preference for members of disadvantaged groups was reserved for applicants who could be counted in the college’s multicultural statistics. This caused some admissions officers no small amount of ethical dismay.” {snip} The ugly truth is that most colleges, especially the more competitive private ones, are fiercely concerned with their ratings by rating organizations like U.S. News & World Report. And an important part of those ratings consist of a numerical acceptance rate (the ratio of applicants received to those accepted) and a yield score (the ratio of those accepted to those who enroll). The lower the acceptance rate and the higher the yield score the more favorably colleges are looked upon. In extending admissions to well-qualified but financially strapped whites who are unlikely to enroll, a college would be driving both its acceptance rate and its yield score in the wrong direction. Academic bureaucrats rarely act against either their own or their organization’s best interests (as they perceive them), and while their treatment of lower-class whites may for some be a source of “no small amount of ethical dismay,” that’s just how it goes. Some of the private colleges Espenshade and Radford describe would do well to come clean with their act and admit the truth: “Poor Whites Need Not Apply!”

http://www.westernyouth.org/articles/the-true-face-of-campus-progress/ "This last week, Youth for Western Civilization dropped by the left-wing "Campus Progress" conference here in Washington D.C. It was held in the Omni Shoreham hotel, with the main portion of the conference taking place in an ornate ballroom filled with a massive stereo system and two giant projection screens. The conference was headlined by big name speakers like Samantha Powers, John Podesta, Van Jones, and dozens of other presenters and panelists flown in with all expenses paid for the weekend. At least George Soros isn’t lacking for money in the Obama Recession. All our favorite leftist archetypes were in attendance: The advocates for the re-distribution of wealth – You know the type. The angry scowlers of the Al Sharpton strain who demand affirmative action and blame white people for black and Hispanic economic disparities, directing a constant barrage of eye-daggers at anyone who appeared to represent "the man". Illegal aliens and their apologists – They were there in force. Their main objective is the so-called DREAM Act which would give illegal alien minors the ability to become permanent residents if they go to college. According to these law breakers, borders and sovereignty are a thing of the past... for Western countries. It's of course essential that Mexico, Honduras, Vietnam and all the other places these illegals hail from maintain their sovereignty, culture, and identity, while the United States is transformed from a “melting pot” into a “tossed salad” in the never ending pursuit for diversity and inclusion. The LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender advocate) legions – These were the most prominent groups there. We were unable to guess the gender of many of them. A number of them were wearing shirts advocating a "marriage boycott" until all states begin issuing "gay marriages". Good luck with that." the insanity which will engulf us in the next 20 years. even with instructions to be as "low key" and "obfuscating" as possible... some communist agitators were incapable of camouflaging their own insanity.

no the IQ test measures intelligence relevant to our culture... and is still the most widely accepted means of measuring intelligence... despite what sociologists, and other non-scientists say to justify their BS ideology. and congo pygmies were studied at length from the 60's to the late 80's and were consistently found to have IQ's around 60... http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/2010%20PAID%20(Brain%20size%20and%20national%20IQ).pdf

let me try to play the liberal angle on this one... hmmm this reeks of discrimination... and racism on the part of water and pools... maybe its our fault for being so culturally insensitive, pools are a product of our racist, exlusionnist culture... maybe we could institute affirmative action type programs.. where minorieties who want to learn to swim get a free pool and swimming lessons and gets payed for it too... all at the expense of the tax paying animals of this country who aren't minorities. and if anyone dares to articulate the fact thta blacks are poor swimmers... I might call the ADL...

mistook you for wild bill...: "Nature WANTS us to mix our gene pool! It means healthier kids with more likelihood of POSITIVE traits cropping up! Like it or not, we are heading towards a 'Star Trek' population of mixed parenthood. What's more, our race will be much the better for it!" but I suspect you have similar leanings.

why bring up stormfront? you advocate similar ideas on race... the only difference is you attribute superiority to a different race... its all the same... presumably you can relate to stormfront then?

frightning... what an ignominious and INSANE retreat for a nation that used to be the brighter beacon for freedom in the world... The French have proved that they are unfit for civilized life and therefore must abandon the priviledges of civilization... they did this all so that they could have lots and lotsa "social justice" and crime... May they reap the consequences of their atrocious treason of their ancestors. I will not mourn the inevitable chaos and suffering which awaits them.

hahaha put your money where your mouth is if you dare... if you're going to spout anecdotal refuse could you at least TRY to back it up. And stop with the jungle fever nonsense, its clear you think highly of yourself for having a non-white wife... we know... we know.,... move on... we know people who think like you brandish nonwhite partners as baubles, to show how politically correct you are...

not at all, there are many subcline in sub saharan africa... from the pygmies (pint sized creatures with IQ's in the low 60's, to the Dinka- tall and thin as a rail... there are many variations... but it is accurate to generally describe all of them as sub saharan african , which situates them.

hmmm kinky hair is now a nordic european trait youre saying Jack...?? yeah... k whatever.

ahagahhhahahaahahaahh!!! woow, thank you, disqualified, next

evidence? link? educate me... the only aqueducts I know of are Roman... and chinese... I know of the pathetically overblown "Great" Zimbabwe ruins... heaps of haphazard rocks... but that's not anything impressive.

wow swing and a miss... you should feel bad about yourself http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Sub-Saharan-Africa.png&imgrefurl=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sub-Saharan-Africa.png&usg=__DhTu2G_BHCd34PR5Ujj3gyx6dRQ=&h=341&w=341&sz=4&hl=en&start=2&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=9-BOpRYHOoCUwM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsubsaharan%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbs%3Disch:1

I know this goes against internet guidelines and rules... but I'd swap a picture of me and my lady vs you and yours... I'm curious to see what you two look like... are you game?

I knew I wasn't going to get a serious attempt! she is mediocre at best and is definitely not pure blooded black... its a fair bet she has some "racial mixtures" not sure how she compares to say: Joanna Kruppa http://www.listown.com/images/celebrity/200902/Joanna-Krupa-20090204063644.jpg but hey! knock yourself out if you like afro bushe(S)

i'll quote you directly again: Wild Bill: "Nature WANTS us to mix our gene pool! It means healthier kids with more likelihood of POSITIVE traits cropping up! Like it or not, we are heading towards a 'Star Trek' population of mixed parenthood. What's more, our race will be much the better for it!" so you`re saying that nature wants us to eliminate non-mixed races, and that since this is what nature wants: its better! (superior) you`re saying that mixed raced children derive advantages from being racially mixed... what you`re saying pretty unambiguously is that blacks and whites for instance are inferior to mixed race people... which is of course racism in the most basic form...

no, certain fields involved in Psychology (such as pharmacology) are scientific, but the process fo analysing a patients thoughts and deriving scientific conclusion from them, is hogwash... nobody in the academic world would support the theory that psychotherapy is a science... Psychotherapy is often revered as a science however many well renowned scientists and hard science associations describe Psychotherapy in the most contumelious terms, sometimes saying of the practice that it amounts at best to a descriptive taxonomy and schematics- not a science. The skeptical reader may wonder what psychologists and psychiatrists have to say about the scientific standing of their own field. As it turns out, the more perceptive among mental health professionals freely admit their field is not based in science. In the 1950s the American Psychological Association (hereafter APA) commissioned a study of the scientific standing of psychology. In 1963 the result was published in six volumes as "Psychology: A Study Of a Science" (Koch, S. (Ed.). (1959-1963). New York: McGraw-Hill). Sigmund Koch, the director of the study, came to these conclusions: "The truth is that psychological statements which describe human behavior or which report results from tested research can be scientific. However, when there is a move from describing human behavior to explaining it there is also a move from science to opinion." "The hope of a psychological science became indistinguishable from the fact of psychological science. The entire subsequent history of psychology can be seen as a ritualistic endeavor to emulate the forms of science in order to sustain the delusion that it already is a science." “At this point it must be clear to the intelligent reader that clinical psychology can make virtually any claim and offer any kind of therapy, because there is no practical likelihood of refutation – no clear criteria to invalidate a claim. This, in turn, is because human psychology is not a science, it is very largely a belief system similar to religion.... In the final analysis, the present state of psychology is the best answer to the original inquiry about whether it is scientific, because if human psychology were as grounded in science as many people believe, many of its historical and contemporary assertions would have been falsified by its own theoretical and clinical failures, and it would be either replaced by something more scientifically rigorous, or simply cast aside for now. Psychology and psychiatry have never been based in science, and therefore are free of the constraints placed on scientific theories. This means these fields will prevail far beyond their last shred of credibility, just as religions do, and they will be propelled by the same energy source — belief. That pure, old-fashioned fervent variety of belief, unsullied by reason or evidence”. (http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/)

thank you for frankly conceding that Natives are a dependency race... who must be fed and maintained by other races... because of their simpering helplessness... you`re making my point for me charter... thank you!

that very concept would have made OUR ancestors of just 65 years ago react similarly. Incredible what a few decades of nonstop TV brainwashing and the occupation of our universities by revolutionary Bolsheviks can do to a nation! then again its easy to destroy, difficult to create... multiculturalists and liberals today are destroyers (who pride themselves on how quickly things are changing...)

that`s a weak comparison. Psychology isn`t science to begin with. And also no geneticist would ever argue your ridiculous point. Ernst Mayr, "perhaps the greatest evolutionary scientist of the twentieth century", might be called the Linnaeus of the Modern Synthesis {neo-Darwinism}, his Systematics and the Origin of Species set forth the biological species concept still in use today, with large utility for explaining speciation. Recently, while thumbing through some archived issues of the AAAS' Daedalus I found this amazing essay of his {Winter 2002. Vol. 131, pg. 89}, which I've published below, in which he suffers no fools from the "race does not exist" camp {all emphasis and what-not mine}: The Biology of Race and the Concept of Equality. Ernst Mayr "There are words in our language that seem to lead inevitably to controversy. This is surely true for the words "equality" and "race." And yet among well informed people, there is little disagreement as to what these words should mean, in part because various advances in biological science have produced a better understanding of the human condition. Let me begin with race. There is a widespread feeling that the word "race" indicates something undesirable and that it should be left out of all discussions. This leads to such statements as "there are no human races." Those who subscribe to this opinion are obviously ignorant of modern biology. Races are not something specifically human; races occur in a large percentage of species of animals. You can read in every textbook on evolution that geographic races of animals, when isolated from other races of their species, may in due time become new species. The terms 11 subspecies" and "geographic race" are used interchangeably in this taxonomic literature." go ahead and remedy the deficiencies of your liberal education: read the whole text: http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001951.html

essentially what you`re saying is that there is such a thing as a superior race... interesting and i`d challenge you to find me a pure blooded african woman that would rival Nordic Europeans in attractiveness... and also the big problem is found in intermarriage stats. Black women are by far the most celibate group in America, 70 to 75% of black women i the states aged between 23 to 55 are single. that`s about 8 times the celibacy rate as white women (who typically seek marriage less then blacks!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvQel-sIKwM but even still mix raced couplings occur only about 7% of the time for whites (usually the underclass part too). and this is despite 25+ years of intensive brainwashing to promote the idea that the only way to not be racist is to bed down with non-whites. I`d say darker races tend to want to breed LIGHTER, in nearly every culture (india, China, Japan, Persia, the Muslim world) white skin is considered superior in ways that would astonish most liberal imbeciles living in north america today. In certain portions of africa, skin lightening creams are everywhere, and are very hazardous to the blacks who use them: many creams contain mercury even! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_whitening Its only in north america that we take the opposite view: that blacks are more attractive then whites (becasue our mass media is busily engaged in ethnic genocide), it is consistent with the way we portray minorities as blameless, more intelligent, more sensitive, superior morally, in our selection of news stories (interracial crime: how we give star billing to white on non-white crime, and how we ignore anti-white hatecrimes), it is also reflected in how we oversaturate our programs and advertisements with blacks... in canada 34% of the actor roll cast in commercials are minorities despite the fact that they represent an 8% minority,... and lets not forget how Hollywood portrays blacks, Will Smith, Jaimie Fox movies, the scientist and president in 2012, morgan freeman! really without this artificial manufactured media oversaturation, (knowing what we know about the power of TV) minorities would be where they are in the 50`s... looked at as swarthy, ugly and illegitimate aliens.

good luck proving that blacks are the same genetically as asians or whites is what shoudl come to mind... but hey!