bjre

Europe to Investigate WHO 'False Pandemic' Scandal The resolution to launch the emergency inquiry was approved by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) and passed through the health committee unanimously. It states in part that “in order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies, and needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines.”

I guess so, because it was too dramatic and it happened just in the time when the machine company need it.

Your link From your other link Your link No evidence that they have use scientific methods such as statistics that can prove their opinions. That is because it is the critical time to develop children's cognitive ability when they are at small age, and proper corporal punishment at that time is significantly helpful for the development of children's cognitive ability. That will be helpful in long time to children and to the entire nation. This method is not for adults because The effect was somewhat negated if the spanking continued beyond 12. On the other hand, for police who charges adult for corporal punishment of children, In my opinion, I think "smack an adult" will be better than send him to jail and let him lost his job and the ability to feed his family.

Video: Study: Spanking not all bad for children http://www.wzzm13.com/video/default.aspx?bctid=60353230001#/Study%3A+Spanking+not+all+bad+for+children/60353230001

It is clear that CAS is the evil, not the parents that practice physical discipline.

Spare the rod and spoil the child? Well, it's not that simple anymore Irish Examiner, 1 hour 33 minutes ago / HE WAS only little – about two, I would say – and a bit scruffy, his feet barely touching the floor as he was dragged along the Tesco aisle by his mother who was carrying a shopping basket and also pushing a buggy containing a younger brother or sister. Is spanking children OK? Calvin College professor's research shows adults who remember being spanked are more well-adjusted Kalamazoo Gazette - Kalamazoo MI, 8 hours 5 minutes ago / Spanking children has fallen out of favor for many parents. Is spanking children OK? Calvin College professor's research shows adults who remember being spanked are more well-adjusted Muskegon Chronicle - Muskegon MI, 13 hours 43 minutes ago / Spanking children has fallen out of favor for many parents. Smacked children more successful later in life, study finds Irish Newspaper, 15 hours 7 minutes ago / Children who are smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those spared physical discipline, research suggests. Study: Spanking may not be all bad for children ABC - WZZM 13 - Grand Rapids MI, 15 hours 38 minutes ago / Many experts advise against physical discipline, but Calvin College Psychology professor Marjorie Gunnoe says her research shows spanking may not be all bad. “Smacking” Your Kids Leads To Better Discipline Say Anything, 23 hours 43 minutes ago / It found that children who are smacked before the age of six perform better at school when they are teenagers. Latest News : A smacked child ‘is a successful child’ Tehran Times - Iran, Jan 04, 2010 / Young children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. Science: Actually, you can beat sense into your kids Hot Air, Jan 04, 2010 / It found that children who are smacked before the age of six perform better at school when they are teenagers. Spare the Rod -- By: Jonah Goldberg The Corner on National Review Online, Jan 04, 2010 / Young children spanked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. Smacked children 'more successful' Ruby Room, Jan 04, 2010 / These days, smacking children is very much frowned upon. Smacking guarantees child's success: Study PressTV, Jan 04, 2010 / A new study finds that despite the general belief, smacking can be beneficial for young children, helping them to grow into happier and more successful adults. Latest Smacking Research Shows Benefits New Zealand News, Jan 04, 2010 / Family First NZ is welcoming the latest research showing that light and reasonable smacking is beneficial to children in their development, and despite claims by government funded groups, kids aren't damaged by its occasional use. Study: Spanked Kids May Grow Up to Be Happier, Successful FOX - KDSM 17 - Des Moines IA, Jan 04, 2010 / Young children spanked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. Join the online debate. The Advertiser, Jan 04, 2010 / SMACKING is good for children new research has found, and the practice has overwhelming support from AdelaideNow readers. Smacked children hit their straps Herald Sun, Jan 04, 2010 / The Christian Calvin College in Michigan quizzed 2600 teens and found the 75 per cent who were smacked at ages 2-6 performed better on measures such as academic and volunteer work, college aspirations, hope and confidence than those who weren't. DEBATE: Can smacking be good for your children Express.co.uk, Jan 04, 2010 / Researchers have discovered that youngsters who were physically ­disciplined by their parents grew up with better prospects than others. Young children who are smacked 'go on to be more successful' Daily Mail - London - UK, Jan 04, 2010 / Young children who are smacked by their parents grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, research shows. Family First: Latest Smacking Research Shows Benefits New Zealand City, Jan 03, 2010 / Family First NZ is welcoming the latest research showing that light and reasonable smacking is beneficial to children in their development, and despite claims by government funded groups, kids aren't damaged by its occasional use. Smacked children hit their straps The Daily Telegraph - Australia, Jan 03, 2010 / YOUNG children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. Smacked children hit their straps The Australian, Jan 03, 2010 / YOUNG children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. Smacked kids more successful The West Australian, Jan 03, 2010 / Children who are smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those spared physical discipline, US research suggests. Smacking 'is good for your child' Daily Express - London - UK, Jan 03, 2010 / Researchers have discovered that youngsters who were physically ­disciplined by their parents grew up with better prospects than others. Study Finds Children That Are Spanked Become More Successful Than Non-Spanked Peers ThisIs50.com, Jan 03, 2010 / Here's a shocker: Young kids who are smacked by their parents grow up to be more successful than children who're never spanked at all, claims a new study. Do smacked kids grow up happier? Sydney News, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. Smacking 'is good for your child' Express.co.uk, Jan 03, 2010 / Researchers have discovered that youngsters who were physically ­disciplined by their parents grew up with better prospects than others. Spank your children Tinkerty Tonk, Jan 03, 2010 / Children who are smacked by parents often turn out more successful than those who have not, research has found. Do smacked kids grow up happier? The Daily Telegraph - Australia, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child 'is a successful child' Vietnam Tribune, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child 'is a successful child' PerthNow - Australia, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child is a successful child Herald Sun, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child is a successful child AdelaideNow - Australia, Jan 03, 2010 / YOUNG children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. A smacked child is a successful child The Advertiser, Jan 03, 2010 / YOUNG children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. A smacked child ‘is a successful child’ The Daily Telegraph - Australia, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child is a successful child The Courier-Mail, Jan 03, 2010 / YOUNG children smacked by their parents may grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, a study has found. A smacked child is a successful child news.com.au, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. A smacked child ‘is a successful child’ The Australian, Jan 03, 2010 / According to the research, children smacked up to the age of six were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to university than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. Smacked children more successful later in life, study finds Telegraph - London - UK, Jan 03, 2010 / A study found that youngsters smacked up to the age of six did better at school and were more optimistic about their lives than those never hit by their parents. Children who are smacked when young are more likely to be successful, study finds Daily Mail - London - UK, Jan 03, 2010 / Children who are smacked by parents often turn out more successful than those who have not, research has found. A smacked child 'is a successful child' Hindustan Times - India, Jan 03, 2010 / For long, it has been a divisive debate -- is smacking your child right?

Spare the rod and spoil the child? Well, it’s not that simple anymore Read more: http://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/stephen-king/spare-the-rod-and-spoil-the-child-well-its-not-that-simple-anymore-109052.html#ixzz0bnJhr6oX Twenty or 30 years ago few would have blinked an eye: walloping kids was "normal". Nowadays, though, smacking in the interests of discipline and good behaviour is a practice many parents would defend but fewer and fewer actually practice, least of all in a busy supermarket. In some European countries that mother could have been up on an assault charge. Even those Irish parents who do still smack admit to feeling guilty afterwards. But a new study, published last week, has found that youngsters smacked up to the age of six actually do better at school and are more optimistic about their lives than those never hit by their parents. They are also more likely to undertake voluntary work and are keener to attend university, experts discovered. This story appeared in the printed version of the Irish Examiner Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Smacked children hit their straps in teens http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/smacked-children-hit-their-straps-in-teens/story-e6frf7jo-1225816065473 CHILDREN smacked by their parents may become more successful as teens than those who weren't, according to recent US research. The Christian Calvin College in Michigan quizzed 2600 teens and found the 75 per cent who were smacked at ages 2-6 performed better on measures such as academic and volunteer work, college aspirations, hope and confidence than those who weren't. The effect was somewhat negated if the spanking continued beyond 12. Smacking isn't banned in Victoria but parents risk being reported to police for abuse.

I think if it is for protecting US, US should pay for it. And with the privacy lost cost as well.

Body scanners coming to Canadian airports: reports Body scanners coming to Canadian airports CBC has confirmed that the machines, which can scan through clothing, be installed in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax. The Canadian Press reported that 45 scanners will be installed in 11 airports over the next two months. Airport Body Scanners 'Break Child Porn Laws' Campaigners have claimed the images taken by the controversial machines could breach legislation making it illegal to create indecent images of children, as well as threatening the privacy of other passengers. Guess the "Plane attack story" is just another pre-designed event for big company to sell their security machines. Questions and answers about full-body scanners In U.S. airports, the Transportation Security Administration has begun expanding the use of full-body scanning machines, although passengers can opt for a physical pat-down instead. The TSA has 40 in place, just bought 150 and plans to buy 300 more. At the moment, that's probably not realistic _ in the U.S. alone, there are 730 checkpoints with 2,100 security lanes at the nation's 450 airports, and there are thousands more lanes at airports around the world. Cost may be an issue _ the machines can be $130,000 to $200,000 each.

Guess this is another pre-designed event for big company to sell their security machines. Body scanners coming to Canadian airports

Should all Canadians move to Banff National Park and Hamber Provincial Park?

It is always nice to have positive hopes. I remember before Iraq war, politicians were in their daytime dreaming that Iraqi would welcome Americans bring "freedom" to them. And on the media, there were people welcome US marines, although some people found same people in different places did the same welcomes. And later, the welcome became endless suicide bombings. If you like to understand what they think, it is better let them have the freedom speech in the media here, so that they can talk in their own voice, in stead of attacking journalists like what US tank did in Iraqi. Actually the freedom speech is too limited here so that people like you can only enjoy in their hopes that can be totally different from the reality.

Historically, lots of those terrorists were started with groups that supported by the United States for fighting Soviet Union in Afghanistan. They were not created by Afghanistan government. They were created by US itself.

No NATO country was attacked by Afghanistan or Iraq. NATO counties are attacking those 2 countries for profit of oil companies and weapon companies.

Western politicians love to use its powerful jail, police, court, inspection methods to deal with crimes. They can not solve the problem, look at the crime rate of the States. They don't want to find the reason and use kindness and fairness to make people happy so that less and less people want to crime because of anger, grief, despair, and other mental problems caused by bully or unfair treatment. That is because all they want to do is take money even if it will cause damage to others.

Research always need money. Business can give money. Election need money. Business can give money. If Politician work for Large Business, they are more likely get more money for election. If Research work for Large Business, they are more likely get more money for research. So that more and more politicians work for large business people. So that more and more research work for large business and try to prove result business people want. I am not sure which science is scientific enough without ignore the evidences that may not good to the result business people like.

Merry Christmas to the children that lost mom and/or daddy due to CAS. Merry Christmas to the parents that lost their children due to CAS. Merry Christmas to those who suffered a lot from CAS. Merry Christmas to those whose life become a mess because of CAS. Merry Christmas to those whose lost too much because of CAS in Canada, the United States, United Kingdom, and wherever there are similar kind of organizations. Specially Merry Christmas to bluelove's husband, once he had a happy family, and his wife suicide 8 months ago because of CAS. Wish you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Hope at least Canadians can get rid of CAS and have a little while peaceful life in the holiday season.

'The global-warmers were bound to attack, but why are they so feeble?'

Yes there are criticism in the web, some of which are from those people who have built their careers and reputations on it. There are lots of opinion on the web support it as well, which makes me think lots of that in the film maybe true. I have no idea how can isotope signature tell CO2 is out of your nose or from a monkey's nose. And I don't know what is difference between CO2 from your nephew's nose with those produce by a car as a greenhouse gas. :-) It will take lots of time to reply this. I don't want to take that much time now... I guess there are posts exist from others that may helpful for you to understand it although I did not read it all...

List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita United States : 19.1 ton per capita 2007 Canada : 17.4 ton per capita 2007 Denmark : 9.2 ton per capita 2007 China : 4.6 ton per capita 2007 For China, there are 9% GDP is from export, so, at least 9% of CO2 is for other countries.

It is not the film alone, there are other studies, like this from NASA: NASA Goddard study suggests solar variation plays a role in our current climate The inconvertible fact, here is that even NASA’s own study acknowledges that solar variation has caused climate change in the past. And even the study’s members, mostly ardent supports of AGW theory, acknowledge that the sun may play a significant role in future climate changes. Is NASA fraud too? And this one: Global Warming 'Science' However, as the work of McIntyre, McKitrick, Wegman, Carter and others has spread, scientific "consensus" in recent years has begun collapsing. A detailed review of 539 technical papers about climate change published between 2004 and 2007 found no evidence -- none --supporting specific "catastrophic" climate change due to man. In March 2009, a petition signed by over 31,000 scientists stated in part: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." ... What is becoming clearer is that the concept of "manmade global warming" may be one of the greatest hoaxes in world history. How soon this will become generally known will depend on how forcefully the political effort seeking both national and international control of industry and wealth redistribution can keep the hoax hidden by intimidation and forcefully amplified rhetoric while systematically jeopardizing the economies of America and other developed nations.

proof? (BTW, I have a master's degree in Engineering, I ask for proof in case I am stupid than a high school grad ) proof?

How much CO2 emissions from China for every person, How much for each Canadian? How much for each American? Did your system tell each human being has same human right? Why you forget now? How much CO2 emissions from volcanoes? How much from the oceans? How much other green house gas like water vapor generate from the oceans? Is the green house gas the main reason that cause global warming? No, the solar activity is the reason that men can do nothing on that: The Great Global Warming Swindle It is a only a political game that US don't want others to develop.

Tibet was never a nation. Before 638AD, there are many tribes there, the first king of Tibet conquer most land there and try to fight Tang Dynasty (Ancient China) in year 638, he was failed, so he negotiated with Chinese Emperor, The Emperor assigned him as King of Tibet and married him with one of the Emperor's daughter in year 641AD, since then Tibet is part of China. Chinese army did not enter there kill native people as Europeans enter North America and killing native people. Current DaLai Lama was assigned by Chinese government in the February 1940. It is British entered Tibet and killing people there at year 1888 and year 1903, after that, British try to separate Tibet out of China since 1907, in 1942, they try to make Tibet "independent" so that they can control it. And in 1940s, US started try to do the same work. in year 1950, US send many weapons to Tibet. In the year 1957, US trained 170 oversea Tibetan and send them back to Tibet try to separate Tibet from China and persuade DaLai Lama. In the year 1959, DaLai Lama start to fight and failed and flee to India. So Tibet was never a nation, from 641AD it is a part of China. If you want Tibet separate, you'd better ask all those whose ancestors are Europeans get out of North and South America and return the land to the native people.