dub

here is the video of the shooting.

Haaretz who cares about the law?

there you have it. you have zero integrity. 3 reputable rights organizations have been called liars by dancer. this, after their investigations and reports. why? because their reports criticize israel. you are a dishonest person and i'm sure anyone who reads your posts realizes this.

why not abandon the lame "i know you are, but what am i" zingers for the pre-school kids. you are a dishonest person. the red cross, amnesty and HRW are not discredited. no one likes a war crimes apologist.

you're posting the same thing krusty already did. opinions from the pro-israeli fanboys. alan dershowitz is a person that is not taken seriously by anyone who is interested in facts. also, those are comments about the lebanon war. there have been investigations done by 3 major human rights organizations and the proof is on the table. proof that you rather not talk about.

i disagree. facts have been presented by human rights organizations and israel wants no part of it. if israel could prove that they have not committed war crimes, they would have cooperated with all of these organizations during the investigations instead of making any excuse possible not to.

when did i say 'jews' are a cancer? why are you lying?

okay. it's one thing to try to create a fictional history of the world, but to sit here and act like a spazzing lunatic and fire off nonsensical accusations about posters with their posts right here to prove you're a liar, is another. you are officially on the ignore list.

it's like when sony used a fake critic to praise its movies. when you are condoning a government paying money in order to manufacture consent, you're in good company like the supporters of china, iran and north korea.

everyone, including the red cross, amnesty and HRW are making shit up and the IDF has done no wrong. would you like to go on record with that? i can go on record as saying that israel and the IDF has made stuff up numerous times.

okay. the grand mufti was a general in the SS and hamas and hezbollah are all nazis. why do you have the attention span of a guppy? how about the global language dictionary that this thread is about?

you're losing it and are not making sense. you accused kuzadd of posting something about 'jews controlling the media' but were not able to provide proof of this. you lied about it and tried to defame a poster with those lies. now you're crying about hamas paying me? wtf are you talking about? get yourself together and stop being such a retard.

it's good that you're finally admitting that israel has "broken some rules in the process". you realize that many regimes, including the nazis, have used 'self defense' as justification to do some pretty shitty things. these rockets killed a total number of 3 israeli civilians during the conflict. you just cannot, in any way, justify israel's heavy handed attack. you can try, but no one is going to accept it. especially not with the mounting evidence of illegal tactics by israel by more than 1 human rights organization. this is why we have the geneva convention and international law, which we are all signatories to. it is to distinguish between what is permitted and what is not. all western countries and israel have signed onto it and must abide by it. if a group of people start throwing rocks at your house (for a second, lets pretend it's unprovoked), and you reply by throwing a bomb onto the building where the rock throwers might be and killing everyone in the building (including bystanders) and also people around it, you cannot justify your action. all of these rights organizations' cornerstone is the geneva convention. they're experts at what they do and have not limited their criticism of human rights violations. they've criticized every country from iran to israel to the US to congo, to russia and china and many more. they have no reason to be biased about their reporting and are recognized for its reliability. their research and information have been used by governments, intergovernmental organizations, journalists, scholars and other human rights organizations.

hamas has done some pretty stupid things. it's good that you're here watching out for hamas' outrageous allegations that they're feeding their girls ecstasy gums. by the way, are these 'alleged' lies about the gum or has it been proven in court that they're lies?

eh? i still don't see kuzadd saying anything about 'jews controlling the media'. you should apologize for lying and trying to defame kuzadd.

just like using other countries' level of war crimes is neither a necessary nor a sufficient premise for justification of israel's war crimes.

lols i don't know, do they? are they nazis? did the nazis patent the salut? what does that have to do with Global language dictionary? is this another diversion with one of your failed attempts at a nazi/arab connection?

don't be so angry at a human rights organization. apparently the UK cares because they agreed to do something about after receiving complaints from MP's and AI. many others care about AI as well. they've accomplished a lot. if you don't believe it, google it.

just as i thought. you've lied. where has kuzadd made any comments about 'jews control of media'?

then he's an idiot. zionism does suck though.

amnesty has. it's in the article. the title of the thread is "UK cuts Israel weapons contracts".

i wonder if i can find a comment by an israeli soldier or police officer and say that it's the official statement of the israeli government. unless you think a comment by a police officer is the official statement of a group, then fix your post Dancer.

israel has decided not to cooperate with any of the investigations. sounds like they already accept that they're guilty.

why do you quote me if you're not going to respond to my comments? it doesn't make sense. i haven't seen kuzadd make any mention about 'jews control the media'. are you being dishonest again?

it's possible that belgium will be the next government to take action. even though this will not effect israel militarily (as they receive most of the weapon imports from the U.S.) these actions by the governments send out a strong political message.