Jump to content

Huston

Member
  • Posts

    192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Huston

  1. But we have to educate them on the real terrorists, like the U.S. or well Anglo-Saxon banking system. These peple have commiting crimes, and they are being bailed out.. I don't know about the Canadian banks.. it is hard to find such coverage, unlike the UK and U.S.. instead, Canadians would rather keep their jobs, because they don't own anything, like food stocks, so that they and fight to fix the system and get their freedom back from expensive state intervention. Instead, we have a red herring in Parliament instead. This is why I have never like the state. If it fails, a lot of people suffer. Anything big is bad. It carries too much risk. People's health is at stake, but they would rather focus on another red herring, Islamic Terrorism. I fell for that red herring. I don;t know Stephan Dion's background, but he has been attack constantly. Who knows, he would probably be a real person for the people, not Harper, not Layton, or Rae or Ignatieff. Oh, there was bad video and poor timing... so? But I guess it does have to do with party funding and not "stimulus" packages. I am not for any stimulus package, I prefer a complete restructuring of the economy, that puts power back into individuals and out of the hands of the corporate hand of the state. And they wonder why only 60% of voters voted.
  2. Oh yes, poverty of chemical, biological and nuclear terrorism of corporate hegemony. Much better than the non-existent chemical, biological, and nuclear terrorism of Saddam.
  3. People are starving in Africa because their crops have been destroyed because of corporate agriculture that was brought in to pay off loans they got from the world bank. Canada supports these global institutions.
  4. Oh, and it more than just that. But these Canadians are safe in their cities, not exposed to anything real, and how peoples freedom has been stymied by the state. Because god-like-control is so much better then personal responsibility.
  5. Yep, terrorism indeed. now Afghanistan and Iraq are part of the corporatocracy. Iraqis had to destroy their seeds, and buy non renewable (as all seeds should be, since they are seeds) seed from big pharma/agri/biochema/etc. Nice corporate terrorism. They are now free. Free being slaves to another state, run by corporations.
  6. You must be one of them, since ad hominem is a sign of bad critical thinking. Oh, and according to Alex Jones, the NWO order is not some sercet, they are quite open about it. i think you need to follow Alex Jones some more before you construct more strawmen about his views. But hey, you have critical thinking. You do solid research on these people that you put down.
  7. Why would i need to do that. I don't believe in a military to impose any self-righteous behaviour on others. Why don't you go to a starving African nation and tell them, Canada will help you out. I'm sorry they are in the mess because of western imperialism.
  8. Umm.. that is a pretty bad way to fight a war on terrorism. Where was the security? The U.S. government was given all the warning they needed. Why did they not prepare? What about all the U.S. and UN terorism against those countires. Imposing puppet dictators, training Al-Qaeda. Western imperialism created these people.
  9. Nice strawman.
  10. You are ignoring the state.. oh that's right, you want the military. It is okay for the state to be a terrorist.
  11. No, we (apparently, we are part of the government.. you know, we "we" say our military.) are just shooting people in other countries by UN edict. You are self-righeous and are no different than those terrorists. What gives you the moral authority?
  12. And this is a problem how?
  13. OMG! it is ok for Canada or the U.S. or the UK to terrorize, though? These so called terrorists exist because of the west intervening on their lives. But somehow Canada is "different" than the U.S...
  14. No, it just means the conservatives can screw this country. We the people need to reorganize the state, and stay far away from the SPP.
  15. Yeah, it is a red herring. A shame there is no real difference in the end. Both Canada and U.S. are corporate whores, and they are sustained by the very population that hate them. Haha. Funny.
  16. But it has been for some time now. If it wasn;'t for government intervention, those companies would not exist or hold that power. They would have had to work for it. It would be a lot cheaper. By removing government, what would you then impose so that they do not gain anymore power then they do have.. they will just end up at world agencies instead, and the people are helpless to get real choice back. But people are too concerned that people jobs are at stake. Is this totalitarian, or just terrible management that things have gone so far, because of neocon and neolib movements of progress, that failure will cause terrible problems like starvation.
  17. Yeah, the don't understand that is it controlled by questionable U.S. corporations or industries (controlled by limited number of larger corporations) in pharmacology and agriculture is supported by the government.
  18. The thing is, is that the conservatives destroy rural areas just as much as Liberal do. It is either corporate hegemony with the conservative, or the academic hegemony of the liberals. Both sides are for cities (that are only possible because of corporations) and destroying of individual freedom by homogenizing agriculture, health, and education. Why is it always democratic systems that create this boom, but massive busts in poverty and death. Maybe becaue it doesn't work, since individuals have no real choice. The corporations are just like religions, they take over, all in a manner that hides the true individuals seeking power. These are selfish individuals who think they are right, and try to socially engineer a world in their image. This has always been the problem with democracy. It has a tendecy to give too much power to the state that things cannot not be managed, and always affects the rural areas.
  19. The rhetoric is a little too strong for Jack, but it is representative.
  20. It is about corporations. If it is connected to Bill C-51, from what I have heard or proclaimed, that it would make it even easier for food and health rehulation favouring big pharma, big agri, big biochema, and some more bigs that have help impoverish farmers, and consumers. Poverty is created from limited choice.
  21. That is one way.
  22. That just does not make any sense. What is the province suppose to do for a federal issue? Can you at least explain?
  23. It makes perfect sense since it is at the federal level that any separation or sovereignty could happen.
  24. Because they are part of the liberals who do not like Dion?
  25. This is your second post in this thread... have you lived your life yet? This sounds like public school propaganda. Rights cannot be guaruanteed. It is an impossibility unless you want to be a part of the borg collective, a Alex Jones New World Order dystopia, or some other dystopia's found in the cyber punk genre. George's Lucas' THX 1138 sounds like a possible future with Bill C-51. Some rights, huh?
×
×
  • Create New...