Huston

Well, nationalization would be Facism... Nazi, where nazi is the short form of National Socialism. So to answer the question, yes!

We actually do. 50.58% "No" to 49.42% "Yes".in 1995. Of course it was. Do you agree that Québec should become sovereign after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership within the scope of the bill respecting the future of Québec and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995? http://207.61.100.164/cantext/modpolit/1995pqbq.html

Yes, concentrations. Considering they turn the monkeys brain to mush (slurry), how can they tell what damage may have occured? All you're article pinpoint the expulsion rates of the compound. So? This is interesting, and the point I am trying to indicate: Hmm, contamination. Which could be through many ways. Since they turn the brain to slurry, there would be no way to figure what this monkey would turn out to be. no investigation on why it had higher level. A mistake? Or some other reason. But since it doesn't fit the satistics, it will not be analyze. It is strange they want to compare thimerosal with MeHg. What about the ethylmercury, that is derived from the thimerosal. All I see is the inorganic, Hg with only one of the organic compounds MeHg. Where is the ethylmercury? Article claims it breaks down faster than MeHg, but it doesn' t give nay parameters, nor does it even record it consentrations. if ethylmercury break down to organic mercury a lot quicker then methylmercury, that should prove to be more dangerous. Concentrations are all good and well, but the damage is still done. I guess your neurons are not that important. it doesn;t matter if the mercury is expelled quickly or not. It is still exposed to the brain as indicated by this study. 1988-1997. How about older. Alzheimer's disease with continual influenza vaccinations? Oh, and this article is still under peer review. As for cigarettes, who said it is parallel to it? I thought the cigarette argument was just about the lobbying?

Time gives you a problem. It existed at one point. I never gave a date for that number.

Well if you want to use the word America. That is why it is only 8 states. While in Canada, it is only one province. Almost 50% from one province. Yep, fringe alright, when compared to the rest of the country.

Nice strawman. Oh science is not evil. However, you don't what science is. I haven't found an article because there is no information out there. I can't find this god, but I can find the Bibles. Like your CTV article. The facts are elusive though. So if you say that for ciggarrettes, why not Thiomersal? As far as a I know, Thiomersal is used by those huge rich organizations which the government and scientists are in bed with. It is all big pharma, and it is a lot more powerful than measily tabocco companies. Okay. I'll find some more CTV articles. There is this: http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/conte...stract/74/2/361 You want to know why it is an antisceptic. This article describes. But is it discriminatory like way your immune system is at rupturing bacterial and fungal cell membranes and DNA? All the CTV test include is how fast it is removed from the body. And? What about what it is doing as it passes through. maybe it is nothing. But 10 years after use. How about like most DNA damaging toxins. 50 years. But, thats just too much. No body monitors their life like that. this is the flaw of the study. The fact for god still have not arrived, so why should I take the Bibles word for it. You are, I am not. Of course it is there for a reason. Then again, how would the vaccine come into contact with dangerous micro-organism. They need to get more kosher. They are pharma, so they do work with dangerous virus, bacteria and fungi. You would think they would be kosher with the risk of contamination. Oh well, as I said, it is a cheap solution. The poor people get cheap things. Like mercury fillings. Does it matter? I made a separate comment of Obama in this thread, and it was not linked to this.

Oh? I would consider taking the word of media or monolithic institutions the same as the Bible or catholic church. you have not seen the study, just you have not seen hell. I'm not going to believe them. So who really has the blind belief? I am being sceptical, I am being safe, unlike you. What if you are outside the statistical average. Remember they are averages. We are products of evolution and nature, there is no such thing as standards in nature. It doesn't really matter. The word is mercury is bad for you, why intentionally add it when you don't need to. Where is the choice. That is the argument. they use mercury because it is cheap. Remember the car commercial. ''It's not cheap, it is inexpensive. You cut your own hair. That's cheap.'' no different than McDonalds.

You have not seen the proof either. You have read an article. You have no clue how the tests were even done. Where are the sceptics?

So I guess you will just accept that, without thinking these global organizations or centralized institutions. If the finacials who graduated from top schoold like harvard can mess up, so can scientists. If politicians can mess up, so can scientists. Are there options. Oh wait, that would be a free-market and that is bad.

What does science say. Well it depends. How were the test done? They were most likely done in a bubble. If it is a preservative, than it is not essential. Preserve what? Well, concerning the Canadian Action Party, their new leader is campaigning about vaccines and what they do, and that doesn't even mention the mercury in them. Dental amalgams are still mostly mercury.

Oh yes, that is better than Obama who pushed a 1000 page bill without any time for even a group of people to read it. Almost no one has read these 1000 pages. What is so fucking stupid is that the politicians passed it anyways. Obama is not intelligent. he has said nothing of content. His words are empty. Pretty yes. Sparkle Sparkle. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwH52CC4YF8 FAIL!

No because big-agri has taken over. And with their genetically modified seeds, they have patents on them and cause trouble for other farmers if the randomnly cross-breed. Look up the Monsanto (the terminator seed). Agriculture has become unfeasible, and the subsidies make the matters worse. Another problem is growing the world food. Most of Canada food is cereal grains (one of which, corn is going to be used for ethanol), this does not require much labour anymore. And the grains are not even that healthy, that is why they are cheap and not economically sustainable and needs to be subsidize. It is weird. Agriculture mainly benifets large corporations, and they still get the subsidies.

Finally a good regulation. I assume the mechanic will still have to pay for the software. If you can't trust GoldmanSachs employess in central banks, you shouldn't really trust large automakers either. Unless.. you are a friend of a friend and just drops his car off at some random out of the way mechanic and can't get it back easily. What a moron. The software for the mechanic should be like that of computers. You work on cars and you can get a cheaper OEM version of the software. Just like computer. You build computers from scratch and you can buy the OEM OS. It should be good competitively. Ah, capitalism will solve this.. no way. We don't want competition. We like our junk from too supposed too big to fails.

Switch clauses.. oops. I meant the stimulus will not stimulate anything. Neo-liberalism is a political tool for a global consumerism. Providing products through cheap labour. Central banks made cheap money with artificially low interest rate levels. this is not corporate greed, it is state corruption. It is big, inefficient, ideaological. Fiat money is a terribly flaw concept. It is debt, and certainly does not trickle down. giving tax breaks achieves nothing, especially when there is a silly little home renovation rebate. So let met get this straight you take out a loan to do a home reno, you know have to start paying that off, and you get a small amount form the government. this sounds like the Bush stimulus, where people got 500-700 dollar checks, nd it achieved nothing. However, this is worse than that, and I don't know the details of the US stimulus under Obama, but it will also achieve nothing. The government is only capable of threough money around. It's education system fails at creating ideas, that is why everyone is dependant on the state or their corporate tentacles, which has been privatized in most countries, not sure of the extent in this country, but it is still the same flawed structure that made the welfare state go broke that lead up to neo-liberalism. The fault should never be pinned on the average consumer. How about big projects not back by much like the ROM building, or fancy expensive post-secondary institutions, and other constructions projects backed by municipal, provincial and federal levels.

No stimulus will actually stimulate anything; only make the matter worse further down the line. He is, as always, a fool. The collapse of neo-liberalism (globalism) caused it. I am looking for less spending and deregulation (or re-regulating) certain laws that make it hard for people to be less reliant on the failed corporate structure through neo-liberalism, also known as corporate protectionism. Guaranteeing them money for their flaky products. Ah, the wonders of a service based economy.

It is the government fault, because it is regulated in such a manner now, that any options are standardize. So if you are not in a standard situation, tough luck. Government enforces positive liberty and it is far too limited in its scope. Parents cannot provide, nor can the education system, both ultimately stymie options.

Huh? If you are not going to say anything, why post?

Economic Left/Right: -0.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.03 Right where I thought I would be.

Very trivial indeed. Mr.Canada need to get a grip that people don't have much choice in where they live, and have little options in moving to places. Forcing them to move over such a thing is economically unsound. Nationalist should be under the same category as racist, sexist, etc.

I always found the interesting, and so hypocritical. Beleiving in a Free market, yet artificially adjusting interest rates.

Yes.... lets think short term... and only covering the surface. :rolleyes

Hahaha.. the Second Bank of the United States allowed unregulated speculation that lead to a to fiat devaluation, do not think that things became unregulated afterwards. If anything, they became accountable, which is regulation. It was the central bank that caused the speculation and fraud. Just like today. The same thing all central banks do. Jackson was right to implement Specie Circular, and closing the central bank. I need a new keyboard. Delete give me this: (]\), enter gives me this' (=) and this (') moves the cusor up a line. Is Max Keiser, Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers, and Ron Paul wrong? That is the question. The sentence about Obama, wrong word, know should be now. As much deflation as possible, unfortunatley not all the deflation is real, like oil prices. They are also trying to keep house prices artificially high. It is not going to happen. Inflation will skyrocket. I don't know how you expect delfation to occur of the year when they are increasing the money supply in order to increase credit so they keep the 'party' going. Umm, inflation. You know, what I have been talking about, but then you mention deflation.. a little weird.

Of course, because capitalism and socialism are not important in this example. That is, is leeches. It is all Ayn Rand.

The blame goes to globalization; neoliberalism

There is no magic hand of the market.. unless you are primitive and don't know that lightning is not caused by god, but by other reasons. The market is determined by the countless people who buy goods. I guess consumers or producers are magical. One would think, but obviously such people have never heard of a boycott. A company is still vulnerable to individuals. Try boycotting a government. Strategically voting for a party you agree with that will never see a single seat ever. Oh yes. Looks like I have more power over Coca-Cola than a government. Because you have no choice, individually boycotting a government, they will go after you, because, well, they own the money, and they want their cut. Oh, well go to another country..