Huston

They are harmless, when left to their own resources. I think you need to learn how to read, and not selectively pick text, for your misconstrued strawmen.

I know all about Islam, and Islam was a threat before the Nazis (oh, by the way, you are a Nazi, National Socialist - for the Nation of Canada and it's people, whom you create a hasty generalization about). However, you are still creating a double standard. Islam was on the fall untill the West decided to interfer with them and partitioned their lands and make deals inorder to strip them of their resources. Why do you think they hate us, outside of the religious rhetoric. the religious rhetoric was dying, but the western states rejuventated it with an additional bonus. Now stop with your ignorant double standard. The west is just like Islam. Islam with it's power became complacent, because anything big is inefficinet and unsustainable, so di the west. You say slamming planes into a buldings. There was planty of warning and information to stop it, but what did the state decide to do.. ignore it. You are a slave and a fool to play this game.

Corrupt countries like China... hmmm.. Canda and the U.S. are corrupt as well. Why did China live off American consumption. Oh yeah.. Walmart.. Zellers, you name it. Canada is just a big part of it as China.

Well, you are obliged to decline.. unfortunately, you have put your power into the state. Oh poor you. The mighty have gotten even more powerful.

I fail to see how Islam threatens us. If they impose their will on us.. well.. they are no different than you trying to impose your will on them. What do you mean by our? I think it is quite obvious that my tradition and culture is not the same as your hateful and ironic stance. Then again, by saying what you have said, you are trying to puch your will onto me as well. The religion of the state is no different then the religion of Islam or Christianity. Anarchy doesn't work, not because of disorganization and lack of cooperation. It doesn't work because people are neurotic idealists like yourself who wish to impose rules onto other people.

Why do you need to be so agressive? It is like you know you are wrong, you you have to resort to bullying to create a red herring. The U.S. automakers are not in trouble because of Toyota, they are trouble because money is worthless!

Agareed, people could barely afford cars when things where at their economic peak.. of course, inflation was improperly recorded, along with the GDP, well actually GDP is a red herring for NDP; where consumption is not factored in as a negative. Somehow consuption was deemed productive. This of course is a fraudulant market, and doomed to it obvious failure today.

Going back to another reason people need jobs, is that their money is worhtless. And a loan needs to be guaranteed. Money need to become available, and so the government has to borrow the money, like they do with student loans, or print more money. What if the auto industry cannot pay off the loans? Or goes back to the exact same problem. It doesn't matter what the auto-industry does, their problems are financial, not evirnmental. People are not buying them because they cannot afford them, and even more today than ever. What market are they going to make this money from? it is like in highschool, they encourgae you to go to university, of course, the student is never educated on the matter and they spend their money on worthless liberal art degrees.. or well their debt. They then go into the market and.. oh there is not market for this. Should we then make a fake market for this? Well.. yes, that is point of schooling. It create oppotunities to give these people, who have no practical knowledge, to work for large corporations that are wastefull with money, because it is the corportion who are employeed by the government, who wastefully spends money, which in turn increases inflation, thus effecting the poor, or those who have no work. Ah, capitalism has been dead for quite sometime. It has been hijacked by the state for a corpocracy. A feudal state where people are dependant, utterly, on the corporate lords. And of course, there is no opportunity for self-reliance because regulations are for the corporations and against those who bring affordable, efficient, and new products to the market.

A retooling of the economy that will actually work.. but of course they won't work, because it is regulated against the small business. It is small business that creates real jobs, that way massive job loses would not occur in the first place. Why should we keep this flawed system together. What did people do with all their money? Oh that's right, they want people to keep spending, because they think that is what creates jobs. To keep these jobs, they must keep producing. I am sorry but the current sysent system is wasteful, it doesn't matter if they are fuel efficient cars, they will still be evironmentally, economically and socially unsustainable, all because they need people working their entire lives because they are wastefully consuming, supporting these unsustainable nationalized corporations.

In what exactly do you mean by your people? Such a large community cannot exist socially. It will never will. This archaic sense needs to go... actually it needs to get back to the literal archaic.. small! Families and relationships create society, not the state. Top down will never work. God does not exist and the state's is not divine right, and self-righteousness is a disease of the mind. Reliance on some state cripples charity because it removes the incentives, by making it an impossibility or a passe (oh the state will do it), or more importantly, NO TIME! They are working for or are infleunced by the governments form of charity. Bureaucracy!

Yeah, they are strawmen.

I know it shows gold. BUT, here is the point that you are missing, it is being compared with MONEY! Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, Max Keiser, and the Austrian economists know this. Are they wrong?

But how will it be managed different than the U.S. dollar? Will Canada be the Gernamy of NA?

My links to the housing industry must be different than yours.

Don't worry, the U.S. will collapse soon, and then we will see who has cheaper garbage. Unfortunately, I think the Amero will come in at that point.

Whatever it means by comfortable. A lot of people live comfortable, even though they are in massive debt. A lot of poor people live in comfort, of course that all comes down to content levels.

Umm yeah.. if other people have known this, then why are the current U.S. Bankers getting bailed out for their fraud. It wasn't just Lehman Brothers.

LOL! For the rich!

I don't understand what you are trying to show here. This shows the instability of money as the money inflates and deflates.

One dip? You haven't paid attention to history. The economy is mainly flawed along the financial market, and the financial market has botten away with some bogus fraud right now and in the past.

Gee, architects are liable for false information on services rendered. Why not bankers? Such flawed reasoning is behind corporation running away with corruption.. just like the banks.

Umm.. that is ideology... keeping the economy moving. FFS! This is the perfect opportunity to restructure the economy... i guess none of the experts actually have any solutions.

Are you actually serious?

That is because the economy is controlled by those in power, not individuals. Right now with the technology, it is totally possible to get rid of large state funded corporations and go small scale. It will be cheaper, it will show individual responsibility (that fights against complacency). more people can farm for a living. People like to eat, and if they love their food, they will help grow it. I don't understand how the power of Monsanto on almost eveything would not result in massive deaths like state run communal farms of the Soviet Union. If their product fails, the world starves, or is terribly unhealthy.

It is? What does Quebec produce that is so essential to Canada? We import U.S. hollywood movies, British music bands, and what not, why not Quebec culture? Or is it just some made up image that does not really exist. The Bloc is legitimate. I don’t agree with them on everything, like how Duceppe call Harper a Laissez-faire capitalist.. or he just called him Laissez-faire. Harper is not let be, not with bills like C-51 and C-61.