Sir Bandelot

They they were not athiests, secular nor commies. They are Anglicans, protestants. So that is christians killing christians. Ahh the religion of love...

Ahmadinejad- "We do not have such problems." - riiight... The problem is simply that they are in denial. And I don't mean the river.

When in Rome Bro, hahaha

Alright, try this- click on "My Controls", then look... left

No

How do you spell signature?

We don't have nukes.

I don't believe this has anything to do with communism or socialist ideology, nor is there a specific plan to kill the friends of Jesus. The killer is in us, and has been there all along.

Very sad to hear that those fine people lost their lives Seems to me there is a government already in place. But their committment to this "war" is dubious as well. So it raises doubts as to the wisdom of putting our troops in harms way when efforts are undermined from the get-go.. Is it Europe who is cowardly or we who are stupid to go in there under these circumstances? I say let them fight their own war

I know that JBG, I was referring to the post immediately above mine... guess I shoulda QUOTED it!

Now theres a great opening post... all jews guilty by association. So what do you conclude, mein Herr, shall we start rounding them all up?

I posted about it yesterday in Khadr should make us ashamed Smetimes the CTV.ca links don't copy well. Here's a link from the CBC- http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/12/12/khadr-trial.html

There's nothing wrong with having spiritual beliefs per se. The problem is fundamentalism... in any religion.

I hope this whole sad debacle will come to an end soon and gitmo will be closed. I have no "opinion" about Khadrs guilt, just want the real truth to come out. Evidence shows Khadr couldn't have thrown grenade in firefight: lawyer A photograph and a U.S. soldier's testimony prove Canadian Omar Khadr could not have killed a U.S. soldier in 2002 firefight in Afghanistan, the terror suspect's military-appointed lawyer said on Friday. Lt.-Cmdr. Bill Kuebler told the hearing that the photograph shows Khadr buried under the rubble of a collapsed building at the time the grenade that killed Sgt. Christopher Speer was thrown, proving he could not have thrown it. Kuebler said he wants the soldier who gave a similar account — identified in court documents only as "Soldier No. 2" — to testify at Khadr's Jan. 26 trial. That account differs widely from another report from a soldier that says Khadr was sitting up and moving when the soldier, believing Khadr threw the grenade, shot him twice in the back. The commission's military prosecutors have disputed the defence's claims that Khadr, the only westerner remaining in detention in Guantanamo Bay, is a child soldier deserving leniency. --- We should be ashamed alright, that we are the only country who didn't negotiate to have this prisoner removed and brought to actual justice.

"Humbug! Humbug, I say!"

Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?

I fail to see what this has to do with jews per se. If he were a christian, would this thread be called "christian frauds"? I doubt it. Or is the guilt complex another manifest of jewish neurosis?

More important, how to get those stains off the white carpets! lol

I told you guys this would be next... when we argued about the "un-bailout" in Canada, I told you it was a pre-emptive bailout becuase they know whats coming. Once again our government makes darn sure the bankers and the elite class is protected, before the first sign of trouble even shows itself. This is a transfer of money and land wealth, increasing the separation of rich and poor. They will get your real estate for dirt cheap when the market collapses... then all we can do is rent, if you're lucky. The rest can live in parks and in cardboard boxes under bridges. This is the transfer of federal money and credit ratings, values based on the government and the people of Canada, to banks and big businesses, who can spend frivolously without any concern because we the people are a bottomless pit of tax money and labour to prop them up. The thin end of the wedge is in... bend over

I think its just because many other cultures have their own celebrations around the same time as christmas. On the other hand some people I know who are muslim or hindu or jew do acknowedge that it is christmas for us and are thoughtful enough to wish others "Merry Christmas". I try to do likewise, by learning when their major holidays are.

Hypocrisy: Conservative saying he would never do what the Liberals do! And on it goes...

I heard tonight that Harper is planning to fill up to 20 vacant senate seats with conservative partisans between now and December 22. So much for reform, eh?

Yes, being empire means you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. Get used to it

Some people just hit the Reply button and start typing, which ends up quoting everything. Why not make it just a little more difficult to quote, so that you have to intentionally want to quote the message, rather than the default behaviour which automatically quotes everything. There is a Reply and a Quote button, as well as an "Add Reply" button further below. This one probably gets overlooked by people in their haste to reply. The purpose of the "Quote" button is somewhat obscure... I don't see the need for it. How about just having one Reply button, which does not quote the message at all, just sets you up to reply in a blank window, and another button that lets you reply with a quote. In other words, remove the Quote button from the form, move "Add Reply" further up so its easier to click, and change the text on the "Reply" button to "Quote", which is what it really does. That would eliminate at least some of the excess quoting going on. You don't really need to write much software to do that.

Part of the problem besides Mugabe himself is, the colonialists take revenge on the people for becoming independent. They seek to undermine the success of independence. Don't deny thats true... sanctions have little if any effect on the leadership, as has been evidenced many times before. See Iraq for example- up to one million people died, including hundreds of thousands of children. Yet Saddam remained and was fat and healthy. The hope is that sanctions will either persuade the government to change, or force the people to remove their own government. But that can't be done when the government has full military control. Besides, what is better, a swift and effective takeover by foreign invaders or a prolonged bloody civil war? I would support the first option. But if its not in the interest of the global community, meaning for themselves economically and politically, it doesn't happen. Instead they wash their hands of the affair and put in sanctions- let them sort out there own problems and devil may care. Therefore one can only conclude, there is no real interest in creating humanitarian democracies.