Guthrie

and yet you cite them all -- no, "methinks he doth protesteth too much" and yes, I agree, it does not make up your entire list - nor do I care what magazines you stack under your bed but I do have an idea of what you read -- contrary to your original claim

lott/lott30.htm -- John Lott is an exposed fraud - please don't ask me to address him Scott McPherson is using Lott for his argument - so it's exposed fraud once removed Sydney's buy back policy is nothing I'm familiar with nor do I see how it fits this particular argument -- especially if they found themselves buying 80% non-functioning guns - as has happened with other buy back efforts

You do cherry pick dont you? Never mind. ok, tell me that salient point you really wanted me to address -- true, I do ignore some part of lot's of posts, usually because I don't consider them fair sport -- you know, as a fisherman, I know it's important to sometimes just remove a hook and let one go

Fact=cite. Or just ask Australia since they banned many guns. Ask the State of Florida and the Castle Doctrine laws. Remove guns, violence goes up. Expand the laws allowing, and murders go down. Damn how that works huh? Thats what you want to believe, absent of any rational thought on the matter. Stop think please. It would not be the TV version of the wild west with everyone pulling out a gun and shooting it in the air. Likelihood...? he would have had one shot and then met some fine metal jackets in a hurry. And if no one had access to..................... 1) cars no one would die of auto accidents 2) pills no one would OD 3) booze no one would get killed driving drunk. 4)knives no one would get stabbed 5) internet then "some" people might read more. "Thats what you want to believe, absent of any rational thought on the matter. " -- no, not absent rational thought It would not be the TV version of the wild west with everyone pulling out a gun and shooting it in the air. - yes, it would, in fact in those places in the world where gun ownership is that common, it is exactly what you have and not for defense but to celebrate weddings or even new cars - he would have had one shot and then met some fine metal jackets in a hurry. - hahahaha - now your contradicting yourself, what you describe here is nothing but a wild west quick draw contest -- no, kids sitting at desks cannot draw weapons, turn and fire before a man with a semi-auto hand gun fires his second round, that is just laughable

Umm...shall we look at this again then? You said "Al Sharpton has never made any division among people using offensive language" That says that Al has in fact made divisions, but never using offensive language. Had you left that last part out, then you would be at least grammitically correct. You qualified it not me Guthrie. But then again, Al has made it his life to be offensive. Do you know anything about the Tawana Brawley case? He was as bad if not worse than that idiotic DA in the Duke Lacrosse rape case. Knowingly implicating a innocent person is the evil of all evils. Al is one of the evils of life. Actually your point about me "killing anyone elses mother" does not imply anything. Should you add a qualifier on the back end, as you did earlier, and it read like this..... "You've never killed anyone elses mother....while using offensive language." That would mean I have in fact killed, just not while swearing. "That says that Al has in fact made divisions" - No, it doesn't in fact, it doesn't say he made any divisions at all??? you're pulling this out of, well let's say, a hat -- because it isn't there

actually, the more heavily armed a population is, the MORE gun violence there is if every VA Tech student had a gun, there would have been perhaps only a single room shot up but part of the death toll would have been crossfire among the defenders however, had the VA Tech killer been denied access to guns, no one would have been injured at all once again, door number two is the only logical choice

sorry - that's a mistake - especially for fruitarians

Didn't you write a week or so ago that races don't exist? yes, and? surely, you don't suggest that since, 'races,' don't exist that neither do, 'racists?' fairies don't exist but fairytales do --- oops, maybe that wasn't the best example

Bingo! yes, they share a history - fellow travellers (so to speak)

every racist remark I've ever heard is dimwitted - doesn't mean every non-racist remark is profound nor does it necessarily mean every dimwit is a racist - just that every racist is a dimwit

So your qualifier is "offensive language" is that correct? Therefore, Sharpton has caused "divisions among people" but didnt swear whilst doing it. Oh in that case, all is well then? Nonsense - If I said you've never killed anyone else's mother - it wouldn't mean you've killed your own mother - that is the worst kind of backward effort at logic no, "offensive language" was not a qualifier - it is the subject of the thread

I noted earlier the guy has a history of getting banned from forums

The usual nonsense from an alarmist. C02 is not pollution and destroying economies is what is all about. Just ask these people who do want to work and produce something of value that somebody actually wants but the I got mine jack crowd won't let them. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...icle1655188.ece CO2 is a greenhouse gas - deniers can say anything they want but they can't change the truth anyone who thinks that destroying the Amazon will, "produce something of value" are no different than the short sighted bad guys, in the kids story, who kill the golden goose - greedy, foolish and ultimately, causing their own downfall

just dealt with that - it simply is a mistaken view. Al Sharpton has never made any division among people using offensive language

from 2005 Link

I don't think so. They have never threatened boycotts against businesses supporting these rappers. No protest marches. It is simple black racism until proven otherwise, ie like condemnation. Yes they have threatened boycotts against record companies -- it isn't their fault that you don't know what their doing nor is it anybody here's duty to prove anything about them - and your willingness to judge without knowing the facts is just the absolute definition of, 'prejudice.' NO, it isn't them, it's you.

Of course there is no truth to that. This is just more propaganda. Doing something as they put it would mean the destruction of our economy with the end result being war. Makes these complainers complaints trivial at best. These people have been sucking millions and millions of dollars extorted from the people they blame, for a lot longer than ten years. There is about twenty four thousand of these people in the entire area with half of them that work for the phony Nunavut government and the other half on welfare. I would say it's ground zero for a useless race of people. it isn't surprising to see this kind of racist remark from GW deniers - nor is it surprising for GW deniers to make the false claim that dealing with pollution is going to destroy an economy the first case just shows the mindset of these guys, the second shows their ignorance -- the facts are, 1) there is no such thing as a "a useless race of people" - and 2) cleaning up the environment will greatly invigorate our economy

They might give a mild reprimand but they don't go after them with the same zeal as they do Imus and others like him. Heck, if they really wanted to condemn the worst of the rap crap, they would demand that the producers and record company owners resign and or quit producing that stuff. Better still demand that the rappers quit and or be fired for demeaning their own race and all. Doubt that'll ever happen, besides Sharpton has a pretty good rap sheet himself . It isn't whether or not Sharpton et al go after someone with, 'zeal phasers,' set on kill - it only matters what the media does with the effort. Rapper sins go on Entertainment Tonight, shock jock sins go on 60 Minutes -- Al Sharpton is not in charge of programming for any network.

I've heard lots of women demeaning other women's, "body parts" -- but for men, it doesn't surprise me that a majority of subjects have a sexual slang attached - I mean, we men have this testosterone issue to deal with

The effects of Global Warming will affect those closest to the ocean first - flooded coasts and of course, failure of millennia old technology -- like igloos Will they listen? - Yes, a majority of Americans (at least) know it's real and perhaps the single most important issue our posterity will face for a long long time. Link

You forgot climate alarmists. yes, I forgot, fascists are quite willing to consider scientists enemies - hence the Buschistas attempts to suppress science in the name of political expediency and loyalty to deep pocket supporters

Thanks, the article adds quite an interesting perspective on today's Iraq.

Fascists love to peddle fear. Fear of Jews, fear of Blacks, fear of commies, fear of Arabs or fear of anyone they consider an enemy. Making enemies is the second love of fascists.

I'm not one to tattle, but I think ScottSA should be removed from this forum. He is obviously a psyc - op officer. No one could be this stupid for real and still be able to type. He is here to use nonsense and stupidity to generate frustration IMO. wouldn't be the first time he was bounced from a forum for such antics -

Guys who pay attention to crap like Fox, Washington Times, Drudge, Frontpage or Axis Annie shouldn't start comparing reading materials. You have no idea what I read. Good try though. quit kidding yourself, you're transparent and anybody on this board can look up where you get your information http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....ndpost&p=171287 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....ndpost&p=141599 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....ndpost&p=141599 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....ndpost&p=205745 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....indpost&p=98777 So, yes I do have an idea what you read.