Guthrie

It's not "allowed". It has nothing to do with "the empire". Stop lying. and he attacks me saying I am quick to call people liars, my what hypocrisy. If it isn't allowed, what has happened to those contractors ???

Another reason Bush had to start a campaign of lies to get America into war.

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson both have come out condemning rap lyrics which demean women, so this: "... not going after the rappers and the like that they have ignored in the past..." - is out of place

you make up quotes for everyone who shows you up Skippy - have you finally passed that remedial English Word Meanings Class yet? Or at least gotten past, 'hegemony?'

Link

By the way you did not make a rebuttal against a Professor in the field.Dr. Heinz Hug The way you guys shuffle and duck and change subjects, it's easy to overlook one of the clowns you present - here's Hug's debunking:

When people like you resort to smearing someone.It is a sign that people like you are not a honest debator. John Daly was a good skeptic. Your anger against oil companies is off base. Try making a better argument will ya? Daly was a crook. It isn't a smear Oil companies are spending millions spreading the lies you believe I don't need a better argument than this: Environmental Protection Agency

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/1588/ http://dede.essortment.com/canadasvietnam_rgwv.htm you'll have to do better than this - do you have something official - or even real?

Ann Coulter certainly believed it: You are away in over your head. Canada didn't send the troops, they went and joined the American military. What Canada did was to supply billions of dollars worth of munitions to the US. prove it

So you admit you were wrong, that's good. Now you are still wrong. Daly got them from reputable scientists and numbers don't change, 2+2 always makes four just as an example. I see you still can't resist using smear as a substitute for science. wow, you are so deep into your cognitive dissonance that when I say "I am right," you think I am saying, "I was wrong." That is not just sad, it is pathological.

Ann Coulter certainly believed it: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/sticksandstones.html

Yes, I am right John Daly died 3 years ago - and I don't care to figure out how old or flawed the numbers your biologist got from him are but I do know the guy was involved in land frauds somewhere in Australia or New Zealand maybe. so you and John Daly and Gary Novak can take your land swindles and your insults to Einstein and your mushroom studies and pile them up in the middle of the room and they won't amount to a dustpile in the EPA's broom closet, let alone the scientific fact that the EPA was forced to admit to despite their dedication to the Buschistas disdain for science --- if the EPA has lied at all it they have done so on the side of Global Warming denials and the oil company clowns who peddle them get over it - you've lost

no, you never proved I was wrong

Yes, really. He's a flake. ergo, so is anyone who believes him

No, they aren't looking for, 'Mr Right.' The Republicans are still looking for, 'Mr Goodbar.'

He hasn't attacked anyone. He has put forword the numbers. That's what science is about, unfortunately you don't understand that. You and the Hansen crowd seem to think it's about smear and politics. he attacked Einstein and every physicist who accepts the Big Bang Theory -- and the source of his numbers (and you know, he doesn't really use numbers, not the way you seem to claim) seems to be relationships he has made up in his own head - moreover, he claims to be a disabled scientist and I am wondering what it takes for a scientist to be disabled -- I mean, Stephen Hawking (another genuine scientist he attacks) never sought disability checks - What terrible and pathetic disability inflicts your biologist?

You have failed to prove anything wrong that he says, and much of what he says is the work of others which he credits for it. This is certainly true and he has not been the only one saying it, and it is because of the Hansen's of the world that it is true, and outfits like the corrupt IPCC. 1. Science is in a state of decay due to corruption. Science sets the standards of rationality for society. What happens to science will happen to all of society. he doesn't need to be refuted, his outlandish and megalomaniacal attacks on the giants of physics single him out as a misdirected nutcase --- all he needs is a soapbox and a bottle of thunderbird in a brown paper bag

and you are, it seems, unable to defend that handicapped biology moron and yet, he is the FIRST source you cite --- that says it all

of course, the way to "deal with it" is to expose the murderers and make them answer for their crimes in a court of law

I am assuming, naturally, that you are NOT the disabled biologist who runs that site. If you are him, I am sorry for the insults but, no, I won't be cutting you a check for $150K. Not even to change your mind.

some of the other brilliant concepts of your source: http://www.nov55.com/index.html The guy has an MS in biology but he wants to correct Physicists on the nature of energy - he wants to correct the CDC on the dangers of Anthrax - he wants to correct EINSTEIN on the nature of the universe :lol: This is also from your source, how sad: http://www.nov55.com/index.html

Not true. I've been doing this for years and have looked at just about everything there is, and there is no evidence yet that CO2 causes any meaningful temperature rise. Only evidence that suggests it doesn't. http://www.nov55.com/crunch.html you want to call the EPA propagandists and liars and at the same time, you offer as evidence evidence that pile of crap????

you have yet to even take an honest look but it's nice to see you label Bush administration as outright liars and propagandists Environmental Protection Agency

Graphic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/s...fknowledge.html like I said, just open your eyes --- No one can help you if you remain in that state of cognitive dissonance.