shortlived

No if it is government, public interest should be in mind, public interest is not only money but the economy in general. One must remember buy america. sending $250,000 to the us is stilll 250k less for Canadians to spend. The expansion is 150% unneeded, they are already paying 250million for parliament upgrades. Including two new chambers. It is just senseless spending. What they need to do is get better use of the land they already have. They are just spending money to spend money, there are government buildings that arn't even being used.

The commons has been given too much authority. The commons MPs should be representing their ridings. The senate MPs should be coming from a background of government administration, yet how many deputy ministers end up in the senate, or as ministers? Simply put a power vacuum has been supported in the commons which has led to greedy partisan control of government funds, resulting in a debtor state. There are no MP mistakes other than a vote in the wrong direction. Unfortunately, parliament has just become an elite club that fails to craft law to make it accessible or to benefit the common citizen. Unfortunately the public elects incompetent people, if being a amateur means not being a professional crook, we need more amateurs.

No I would say that no, altering the interpretation of constitutional documents cannot be done by parliament. The amending formula is listed in the constitution 1982. No law inconsistent with the constitution has force. The interpretation act violates the ammending formula restrictions and so has no force. http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/index.asp?lang=eng&page=information⊂=publications&doc=legislation/chap1.2-eng.htm

Its hard enough finding even one candidate I'd vote for let alone 2.

I don't believe this bs it is all paraphilia. People can fk pussy if they get around to it. Same goes for but and small stuff. Its all just fancy. Tons of lamers out there (no offence to people I know) will settle for polyurethane and those synthoskins. Its just pervsion man, gay and pedo illnesses are just made up. Its just preference. People just need to learn to like it. Its like having sex with a fat woman and not liking fat women. Lots of people end up with "less than optimal mates" Thats what bags and porn are for in the first place. You can look to nature and figure out that this is all just culture or a non specific sexual lust that is behaviourally programmed. It is just feeble mindedness and preference, even macaques seem to molest children.. http://factsanddetails.com/japan.php?itemid=887

Maybe he was just assembling a list of people to save, you know get a good look so he can recognize them if he spots them somewhere, so he knows to get into salvation delivery mode. Or he felt he had failed and so saved them. Cause preists are always accepting of people who really are without all the makeup and style, always out there to save people and protect them from abuse. Sorry.

Partially, some seek to share, this is the pedoring problem. It isn't just about self gratification but sharing the experience with others so it exists. That is part of the voyeuristic issue. People people don't just want the act but be glorified by the act. It may not be overt but the effect is much the same. It is to engineer a subculture where they are advantaged by interaction relating to the pedophilic acts. Some people in both straight and alternate sexualities get off on being watched or people watching them do sexual acts. It is called exhibitionism. Some of these groups may be more motivated by satanistic ritualization and tantric inculturalizaiton.

Yes and violent TV shows don't instill violence in people either. Culture is culture, people are effected by culture. For you to deny that is just out of touch. People exposed to violence are desensitized to its actual effects. Potrayals of sexual violence as acceptable, instills the notion that sexual violence is acceptable. Are you refuting that? "idolization" is a real thing. mimicry and copycating is also "real" denying these things is simply ignorant. While not all porn is depicting violence, porn that depicts violence as acceptable or mundane is very much encouraging sexual violence. media is a form of indoctrination and as such programming which does have social effects. People are programmed by what they view. It works as a subcultural notion and the microscale too.

whatever, hopefully you learned something out of it.

Hey atleast she wasn't 5 years younger than him, just think if he was 19 he would have contracted a psychiatric illness. as opposed to breaking social taboo.

He said the military is dishonourable and wants to torture civillians who fight them because it makes their job of killing people in camouflage harder. (even though the US and other western countries use non uniformed armed combatants as part of their operations contrary to the rules of war) "Resistors to Occupation" arn't breaking "their country's law" so the occupying military force needs to subject them to their law, because if they arn't just killed, they don't want people to think it is ok to fight them and for nothing to happen as a result. As their acts arn't a violation of domestic law, so the military needs to invent their own code that insures civillians can be treated anyway they want for the psyops factor, and inhumanity. As opposed to people who are easy to pick off because they are easily identifiable in standard miltiary gear. Militaries hate guerilla war because they are often effective against technologically superior forces like the west and nato.

If you pay for porn then it promotes the porn industry, so you can take you no evidence to support this elsewhere, because you are wrong. Secondarily people jerking off to porn encourages sexual drive to what they are jerking off to, it is behavioral psychology. Keep fooling yourself. There is money in these sorts of activities, likewise people don't have paraphilic tendencies fueled unless they are reinforced. It is a gateway to those people who get off on the stuff, you fuel their addiction it builds their addiction. So while not everyone is counseled or counselling some people are, even inadvertently. Some pedos are also voyeuristic or want their exploits shared as a way of building their fetish. As such in viewing that porn, you are encouraging them to perform other acts which will build their voyeurism further. Why do you think they are sharing it in the first place? To not get found out? If it isn't money, it is to enhance their thrill via voyeurism. If you know how things work you will see you are supporting the acts by viewing, and if deemed sexual content by the viewer, it is as psychologically destructive as viewing anal sex, and building that as "sexually stimulating" activity. They are all paraphilias. While I don't think there is a standard norm, having sex or performing sexual acts with anyone who does have the ability for informed consent or doesn't grant it is a self destruction of the mind to form your psychology to accepting those acts.. supporting any sort of victimization on the auspice of perversion is definitely a form of abetting a victimization, and thus criminal in conduct. Is that common sense evidence enough for you?

What does Islam have to do with the war in Afghanistan? They are all Muslims, what is your point, it is the tribes that matter, not the religion. The tribal areas in Northern Pakistan and Afghanistan are Pashtun tribal regions.. and they have remained semi autonomous forever. You seem to just be bringing in the stupid factor and saying because they are Muslims there are no autonomous areas. Quick mention some terrorists to further validate your nonsensical statements You should see why this is important given the next Afghan election, which will be problematic to have karzai a virtual dictator for over 10 years.... (Regardless of the real story) That time around there should only be around 15,000 nato troops ensuring the elections are undemocratic and rigged. Even a woman is running this time, imagine if she were to win.......... http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/02/20/afghanistans_fawzia_koofi_will_stand_in_presidential_elections.html (if you have any clue what is really going on... you will see how greatly this is from the real story)

If this were the |US capital we all know it would be coming from Indiana.

NO. I'm going to have to say that physical and immaterial are two different things. One is a violation of the person the other is violation of materials that are freely distributed. It is notions like this that remind how fouled capitalism is. molesting a child is a crime, taking something that is free that has nothing to do with them is not. IP isn't owed, it is reserved. using IP for non commercial purposes should not be illegal, molesting children should. Comparing the two is like comparing theft and murder. They aren't the same. The stuff costs absolutely nothing to reproduce. it is forcing a medium for reproduction, forcing it to cost money, when it doesn't. This is just a legal corruption. people shouldn't get into IP for money, IP only makes money because of oppression of freedom. Attacking people and violating people (which the government does) is not moral as an offensive action, that is initiating the attack without grounds of self preservation. The world is evil. IP law is unethical. God is the creator not some douchebag who wants to hold the world up and restrict other peoples freedoms, they are the criminal. If their art is so popular people should be wiling to pay for their time in other ways. I can make an electronic image too.. look its called copy and paste.. look I made it myself .. I had to pay for a computer though.. so what now everyone has to pay me? IT Is FREE To DUPLICATE ELECTRONIC FILES.. no money is being deprived. Nothing is being stolden, digital data is being reproduced, there is a difference between making something and steeling something. When you steel something you deprive it from the rightful owner. Reproduction is not deprivation therefore is not theft. There is no victimization, I wouldn't buy your crap if I had to pay for it anyway. The thing that makes pedoporn criminal is if it serves to counsel the offence. Much like depicting rape real or re-enacted or snuff films. (although pedoporn seems to be one of the remaining bastions of this.. ... imo pedo porn is no different then rape porn or snuffs, and other extremely criminal porn, which can be next to imposible to determine if it is real or a production. This is very 'questionable' content areas to say the least right alongside teen porn etc... there is a real difference between reproducing items that encourage support for these types of heinous crimes as opposed to distributing something which in itself does not represent criminality. (although ripped music to a lesser extent may) but authentic productions would not so much. (That is because ripped productions (content stolen from the creator but passed off as their own work, are a type of fraud) Money really has nothing to do with victimization if it already wasn't existing. Saying money was taken that could have existed is a nonexistent crime. Sure it is great to dream but there is absolutely no substance to that.

No actually I'm fine, I share my opinion, your are clearly prone to being obtuse. As stated your opening statements were either intentional deception or out of touch with the real world. Have your pick. You are just denying the fallacy of your opening statements, and offer absolutely nothing to back that up. It comes off as nothing more than a scarecrow. I sincerely doubt you are a post doc academic, an academic would have backed up their statements rather than whining.

I need to borrow a bunch of money from you and change my name. YEAH FREE MONEY!

Good call on that nationalization bc They are dead in a couple years anyway. No issue with taking over the staff. They are dead in 2018 anyway.

You seem to be talking sh!t. You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. In 1984 Brian Mulroney, Bouchard's close friend from his law school days at Université Laval, became Canadian Prime Minister. You are telling me that Mulroney didn't know Bouchard was a Quebec Nationalist? Who are you trying to defraud here? Mulroney would go on to ask Bouchard to serve in various official capacities, including (in 1985) as Canadian ambassador to France.[ Bouchard returned to Canada to serve as Mulroney's Quebec lieutenant, and was elected as a Progressive Conservative from a Saguenay-area riding. He was immediately named to Cabinet as Secretary of State and later Minister of the Environment. .. now please tell me those early whole Mulroony 3 terms years Mulrooney had no idea of Lucien Bouchards separatist tendencies. This is a "yes the Tories have no seperatists" because they have no seats in Quebec debates... how many alberta seperatists do they have? HMMM? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta_separatists#Support_in_conservative_parties Premier Ralph Klein told the Canadian edition of Readers Digest that one in four Albertans were in support of separation How many times have I heard firewall Alberta come out CPC supporters on this site? Where is the purge of seperatists from the party there? Hmmm? Tons of CPC MPs supported wildrose while wildrose is championing the firewall. So lets see how many MPs are supporting firewall alberta? Gessh which high profile MP supports the Alberta firewall... which of these sepertists do you recognize http://albertadiary.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/firewall-writers.jpg

You can't leave it to private parties to run federal programs. Any federal program must be completely independent of any private undertakening. The Private Sector is a point of failure for any public undertaking.

You must either be in the field of lying and are trying to manipulate facts, or you honestly must be clueless because quite frankly your statements were a bunch of malarkey. My point was simple PEOPLE DONT THINK THE SAME WAY, and MPs are highly partisan often representing on a very small segment of their constituents views if any. As stated it wasn't insult it was just my opinion. If I wanted to insult you I'd pick much better means than overt insults and vulgarity. None the less whatever you studied didn't seem to clue you in to the real world. Good luck with that. Just to recap your argument was " If you elect MP's based on national votes from everywhere, the MP's elected would actually have no clue how to represent their constituents" How does this differ from how all MPs are put in the house currently? On the contrary I think regional HIVEMIND is far less prevalent than VOTE FOR WHO YOU WANT from a national list. People will be able to find someone to represent their views on a national scale much easier than pick one of 4 on a local scale. This parties pick the people they want though is just partisan BS and counter democratic.It is just party rule systemology. The only democratic vote is a free vote, were everyone has the vote. But a vote for a representative anywhere in Canada is far more democratic than the current first past the post riding system.

why not post this to provincial politics.

It makes perfect sense to have cf18 techs build the replacements. Who the heck else knows how to service cf-18 parts in the Canadian military? The manufacture equipment will also be a nice addition to their tool repertoire for future repairs and replacements. There are laser 3d printers that can make parts these days all you need to do is plug in the cad data. You could 3dprint a whole jet if the printer was big enough. Wow I just had another thought perhaps the aircrew can assemble the flight seats and the flight assistants can help out too.. you know time for flights, time for building jets make a sport of it. \you know they look at the stuff day after day, you'd think they'd know how it looks, and perhaps they could make some suggestions on the new mod for whats missing. If planes are made out of aluminum, then laser sinterers. I independently designed a process for fractal mesh laser sintering and induction curing, and directive heat melding. The Chinese have a similar process for what they call conveyor sintering. Making an aluminum shell etc.. would be almost completely modulated. The airforce techs would just need to do some quality assurance and assembly. Although simple low cost robots could be used to do this. The manufacturing setup costs would maybe be 50-100 million dollars, the only other costs are material costs. It is an almost completely automated process. I would expect you could pump out an entire Canadian airforce in less than a year and have the machines to make spare parts, as well as anything else you wanted simply by inputing a new cad design and assembly set instructions for the robot assistant assemblers.

Isn't it great only for the baby cliff to snarl up traffic...... you know sacrifice sovereignty only to have the thing it was sacrificed for taken away due to us budget cuts http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/top-business-stories/stay-away-from-us-border-amid-spending-cuts-loonies-sinking-anyway/article9201055/

Is pravda not loading for anyone else? I was trying to load the CIA contamination of south american leaders giving them cancer conspiracy reports but Pravda isn't loading... can anyone else go here http://English.pravda.ru