Accountability Now

And here I thought it was from Toy Story 3. I guess I am too young for Cool Hand Luke. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iXHp_xOFfo

I corrected you on your statement above. You're welcome. BTW...I did read her latest statement and it still points towards her innate desire to prove that aboriginals were here all along even though the evidence you provided (as did others) showed that at worst, they migrated here from somewhere else. Of course, her primary concern is aboriginal land rights in Canada and how the perception of aboriginals as 'settlers' may affect these rights which she documented in this thread. As such she goes to such absurd lengths to validate these rights by using terms like 'dogma' or 'white supremacists' toward anyone who indicates these people actually settled here at one point. The ironic part is none of that matters when it comes to aboriginal rights as it matters what is in the treaties/Indian Act, so making such outrageous claims is not only absurd but really doesn't accomplish anything either. But hey...you hitch your wagon to that star waldo!

New World....settlers....oh my! Watch out waldo....jacee wont like what you're saying and will turn on you probably calling you a white supremacist for your colonial views. I'm sure you'll respond with an ignorant fit of rage and cause a shame spiral!

Yes jacee....I was working with Squid and Smallc on this one. Cuz....you know how they love their Conservative policies. Yes...please do ignore any factual, objective fact presented especially when it directly conflicts with your meme. I see it has got you this far on the forum!

yes waldo....I go by a secret handle named jacee. It was I that posted that link and talked about dogma. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! To be fair, I learned the trick of staring an alternate handle from you. Please....get the help you need

Wow....very well thought out jacee. You must be very proud of the intellect and overall consideration you put into that post.

Voila.....http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/25877-theories-of-indigenous-origin-in-the-americas/?p=1170162 How did you miss it???? Because you miss everything that is even close to a valid point. The only thing you don't miss is the word Conservative which allows you to bounce around the room and attempt to seek and destroy any thing related to it. Yet...quoted by jacee. HMMM....again something you perhaps.....missed???? Keep up your ignorant fit of rage. Please.....it looks good on you. A pro tip would actually need to come from a professional. Now if we are talking about giving tips on ignorant fits of rage, then yes, I would take your advice all day long.

Then please remove your statements about the 'dogma' and relation to the factual and objective statement that Jason Kenney made that you chose to state in this thread multiple times. Its not about Jason Kenney....its about your deluded relation of his statement to some sort of white supremacy basis that somehow affects the science behind it. Like I said to waldo above...Justin Trudeau could have made that exact statement and it would still be factually and objectively correct and I would still say the same thing.

I ignored your attempted derail because its just that....thread drift.. But since the moderators don't think it is then I will address it. The thing that you don't get and it doesn't surprise me one bit is that its not about Jason Kenney the person....its about the objective, factual statement that Jason Kenney made and how it in no way is factually incorrect and has zero ties to white supremacy. Fred Flintstone, Hilary Clinton or even your hero JT could have said the same thing and it would remain factual. Again, multiple MLW members including NON-conservatives agreed with me stating this claim was 'hyperbole'. So why make statements on other Jason Kenney tweets when it means about as much as what the goats are eating in China right now. But hey....don't let me stop you from starting a thread on that. Of course that's just it though....the reason you see this as about Jason Kenney is because anytime you see the word Conservative or any person representing that party you begin to froth at the mouth and respond in vitriol behaviour. Your inability to respond accordingly and without bias is your raison d'etre as it allows you to rant and rave on for multiple posts without actually saying ANYTHING of importance but allowing to have your ignorant fits of rage! Various statements were made regarding the 'dogma' surrounding Jason Kenny's position in this thread and it was DIRECTLY pointed back to that thread. I get it....you are a visual learner and need things presented in copyright infringed graphics. Sorry bud....can't hold your hand on that one. The funny thing here is you are the one supporting various migration theories which again flies in the face of what jacee is saying. You are supporting this dogma. You support the white supremacist policy/position. But don't worry waldo, according to you, having a white supremacist position doesn't make you a white supremacist....kind of like saying racist things doesn't make you a racist....or acting like a complete narcissist doesn't make you one.

Its really getting tiring having to hold your hand on pretty much every topic being discussed. However, I will do you a solid and help you out once again. I didn't bring it to this thread...jacee did. In post 10 she directly linked back to her point on the other thread talking about linguistic evidence Notice that link there waldo? Jason Kenney unite the right???? And what was that link pointing to? A post from that said thread which included: This above quote was a response to yours truly and was largely intended to pull those same sentiments from that post into this thread. She then followed it up with two subsequent quotes to various members regarding this dogma. It was on this last post that I reentered the conversation. So waldo, please for the sake of your own sanity, please try to read the thread and comprehend what is going on before you lash out again in some ignorant fit of rage. So....on that note....I will continue with the very on topic conversation presented by jacee. Again....you're welcome.

Especially since you realized it served no purpose in the first place! No...I did acknowledge it but again your failure to read and comprehend basic statements is hindering you once again. That exception is your interpretation of the law. If you feel that your interpretation is correct then lawyer up'! In the meantime the judge has spoken!!

Yes...he certainly does feel that he can do what he wants. The funny this is this whole issue started when I asked him why he left out certain info. If he would have just stated it was a mistake then I would have moved on.....but nope! Making such an admission is not possible for that guy.

you walked away with your tail between your leg for 3 weeks. What can I say. Thus far I have given you free advice but I think it would only be fair to start charging you for such requests. Having said that, the way the system works is each lawyer is allowed to provide their evidence and the judge decides what is the correct path. And in this case....the judge has spoken. As per the CBC page, they specifically state that you are to ask for permission before use. I trust you and this site would not want to be involved in discussions with CBC regarding your lack of permission to use said graphic which is why reasonable steps were taken to remove it. Now....if you want to lawyer up and take on the ol' CBC with your Exception list then have at er'

Fair enough Charles....I will continue to discuss aboriginal settlements and related topics to such settlements. As suggested by jacee, various theories involved include dogma which relates to white supremacy. I will continue to discuss this topic.

Yes...that would be handy. The Jason Kenney thread's OP was intended to discuss the possibility of him entering Alberta politics. Instead his recent tweet regarding Aboriginals as settlers took that thread in a different direction which discussed the theories behind aboriginal origins in North America. This topic was then started in a new thread so that part (Aboriginal origins) of the discussion could continue. The discussion involving Jason Kenney was entirely based on origins which is the OP of this thread and therefore should be relevant.

My oh my....you certainly are rattled by the schooling I gave you on this one! You really should throw in a few 'damns' in there just like you did on the previous thread as that may...just may get your point across! In all of your babbling and whining above you failed to mention the most important parts: 1. The graphic that you chose to copy from CBC was not presented the way the CBC had it on their site. You purposely and deceitfully manipulated the graph for some reason that only a waldo could understand. 2. The rules presented on the CBC 'REUSE AND PERMISSIONS' page are VERY CLEAR on what you can and can't use. I have posted this for your convenience a number of times but as a good Samaritan I will lead by your hand once again http://www.cbc.ca/permissions/faq-general.html#1 If you look at the very first question it answers if you are allowed to use CBC.ca content and you are able to use it with permission. In regards to an interactive specifically, it again states you need permission. I asked you numerous times to present your proof of permission and clearly you didn't have it which is why your manipulated and corrupted snapshot was taken down. Its honestly not that difficult to understand but again you have gone on wasting everyone's time with your bellyaching and whining. Consider yourself informed even though ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law!! Once again...you're welcome!

Are you ever honest? It says nothing of the sort. What it actually says is you need permission to use anything (http://www.cbc.ca/permissions/faq-general.html#1). Obviously you didn't have permission especially since you modified the table to your own liking. I'm honestly surprised you didn't get suspended or banned for that one. By the way...you're welcome! Again...this exact point is the reason this thread started. Jason Kenney is just the focal point of a broad message that jacee likes to send out as a message of her social justice warrior against non-existing issues. Again....the entire reason for this thread is based on the backbone of did the natives settle or were they always here. If it was the latter, then it truly is or should I say was their land. If the former then they are settlers just like us! I will continue to respond to you or jacee or anyone else that comments on my posts as that's what this is....a forum for discussion. If you don't like it then you are free to stop responding.

Interesting....I save you and this forum from potential copyright infringement which was CLEARLY laid out on the CBC site and you call that 'whiney'. I even gave you a chance to remove it by showing you it was illegal but hey....you are who you are. As for me being a moderator....no...just a guy who plays by the rules. I responded accordingly to that member and he never responded in turn which can only tell me he was satisfied with my answer. Do you need the link to see that or should I trust your detective skills? Ooooh...I can tell I've hit a nerve here with all your DAMNs! Again....please explain to me how someone can have white supremacist views and not be a white supremacist. Still waiting...... Chased? No....the topic being discussed here was not appropriate for the OP of that thread as it had nothing to do with native migration/origins. This thread is all about native migration so until the moderators tell me otherwise I will continue to engage in conversation/debate on the possible migrations/origins and their impacts on modern day. Is that ok with you?

Hey now...you're just sour that your recent copyright infringement from the CBC got you into hot water. Come to think of it i haven't seen you posting any sort of graphics lately. I guess that one stung pretty bad hey?? Maybe you should fire up another handle and start posting them again? As for this recent account, numerous members called jacee out on her ties of white supremacy to what Kenney said including MLW member Squid who used the term 'hyperbole'. Of course in your mind one is only a white supremacist if they belong to a club. Claiming his position/policy is a kin to white supremacists but not claiming he is one is pure BS. Does that mean I can say that my policy against visual minorities is the same as racists but I'm not a racists since I don't belong to a club??? Only you and jacee would actually see how that is absolutely preposterous!!

Too soon? But that didn't stop you from making the leap from your very minute, extreme fringe theory to claiming someone was a White Supremacist only because they believed in not just the most popular and widely held theory (Bering Strait) but any migration theory which happens to make up the vast majority. I do particularly like your sudden retreat and attempts to forget your blunder however your credibility is shot at this point. So perhaps you might want to move on to the next urban legend?

No....actually it's not. This thread was created to discuss the off topic aboriginal settlement that you initiated in the other thread but now constantly deflect away from as you realize how ludicrous your entire premise is which seems to be a constant theme. Again, your constant deflection from a simple question is noted. Do you believe aboriginals were always here or did they (like us white folk) migrate from other areas? The floor is yours jacee!

Yes....and you keep approaching science with philosophy as that has treated you well so far. So I'm guessing that you are retracting your claim about Jason Kenney as your constant deflection continues to incriminate you.

Yes...that's what I thought even though you were adamant in the last thread that anyone who believed in the Bering Strait theory was a White Supremacist. Do you still think that or have you seen the error in your ways?